Совет: утром проведите 8-12 часов в одиночестве, чтобы психологически подготовиться к новому дню.
😁133🔥33❤18👍9💯4
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс

Channel
@organizatrix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,159subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001108057134 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @organizatrix |
| Created | 19 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/organizatrix |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 8,159 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 8,167 | -7 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:54 | 8,174 | +19 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 8,155 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 8,157 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 8,158 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 8,159 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 8,162 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 8,158 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 8,160 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 8,158 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 8,168 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 8,174 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 8,175 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 8,175 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,016 reactions across 25 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 799 | 39.6% | |
| 🔥 | 367 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 270 | 13.4% | |
| 😁 | 233 | 11.6% | |
| 💯 | 116 | 5.75% | |
| 🤣 | 56 | 2.78% | |
| 😭 | 34 | 1.69% | |
| 👀 | 23 | 1.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 1.04% | |
| 🎉 | 21 | 1.04% | |
| ✍ | 15 | 0.744% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 0.744% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 0.645% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 0.496% | |
| 🤨 | 9 | 0.446% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.248% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 0.198% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.149% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,045 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @organizatrix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Совет: утром проведите 8-12 часов в одиночестве, чтобы психологически подготовиться к новому дню.
😁133🔥33❤18👍9💯4
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Ситуация, знакомая многим: тысячи фотографий, хранилище постоянно пищит, что места не хватает, искусственный интеллект туда запускать страшно – вдруг удалит что-то не то. А как это разобрать самостоятельно – тоже непонятно. С чего начать? Подрезала в инстаграме гениальную систему, и даже сделала трекер – так она мне понравилась. Открываем фотохранилище, например photos.google.com, и вводим в поиск дату без года: "1…
👍58🔥40❤27
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
File, posted without a caption
🔥13❤4
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Заканчиваю рассказывать про новую книгу Морана "Мое решение – мой результат". Мы уже поняли, что брать ответственность на себя – это хорошо, правильно, полезно. Почему же многие люди этого тщательно избегают? Потому что за нее приходится платить. А именно: - меняться - честно разделить – что в данной ситуации сделали обстоятельства, а что – мы сами - признавать ошибки – иногда для этого приходится рисковать репута…
❤51👍10
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Читатели помогают читателям. Пишет Анна: Хотела подсказать как делиться видео из инстраграмма с теми у кого нет к нему доступа. Есть бесплатный бот @SaveAsBot в телеграмме. Ему можно просто ссылку дать, и он отвечает скачанным видео.
🔥35❤10✍4
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Еще одна парадоксальная мысль из книги Морана "Мое решение – мой результат": ответственность не допускает чувства вины. Да, мы ошибаемся. Иногда очень сильно и с ужасными последствиями. Но одно дело – когда это происходит оттого, что мы что-то сделали спустя рукава, не в полную силу. И совсем другое – когда выложились, но ошиблись по объективной причине – например, неоткуда было взять нужную информацию. Когда мы бер…
👍52❤25🤔6😁2
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
https://www.instagram.com/p/DbskvxYtsLy/ Поскольку инстаграм не у всех открывается, опишу словами: при большом скоплении народа длинноволосый мужчина в галстуке и темных очках пытается элегантно сложить простыню на резинке. Погода ветреная.
😁37🔥19❤3🥱3🤮1
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Продолжаю рассказывать про книгу "Мое решение – мой результат". Моя подруга сменила спортзал. На днях она съездила в новый клуб, чтобы сфотографировать новые тренажеры и послать тренеру, с которым занимается онлайн. Сфотографировала и ушла, заниматься не стала – без тренера никакого желания поднимать тяжести у нее нет. Я занимаюсь самостоятельно, и для меня такая ситуация – нонсенс: вытащить себя из дома, потратить…
👍41❤11🤨9👎2🔥2🤔1
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Много раз видела на просторах интернета такую картину: кто-то упоминает, что у позиции жертвы есть много плюсов, а его заклевывают: "Не смейте обвинять жертву!", после чего разговор заходит в тупик. Давайте разбираться. Болезни, война, насилие, увольнение – всё это происходит с нами не потому, что мы это это выбрали. Мы в этом не виноваты. С этим никто не спорит. Речь здесь про другое: про то, что делать дальше. Обс…
❤43👍11🤮5🤡3🔥2🤪2👎1
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Группа "Время и дело" Год за 12 недель: достижение целей от старта до финиша
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
В группе "Время и дело" сегодня начинается подготовительный этап к 12-недельному году, а здесь я буду рассказывать про новую книгу автора этой система Брайана Морана. По-русски она называется “Мое решение – мой результат”, по-английски – Uncommon Accountability. Книга посвящена ответственности. Автор утверждает, что мы неправильно понимаем, в чем ее суть, поэтому пытаемся ее избежать, вместо того, чтобы использовать…
👍43❤30🤔8🤡1
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥43😭34💯17👀16❤13👍3😁2
Signed Nadya De Angelis aka Строгая госпожа Организатрикс
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @organizatrix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Organizatrix” (@organizatrix), 8,159 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/organizatrix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.