3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 14:36
66
+24
25 Aug 2026, 04:17
42
no change
24 Aug 2026, 04:46
42
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
Avg views / post
9.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
20 (9 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
29
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
26.7%
👎
8
17.8%
🦄
8
17.8%
🔥
4
8.89%
💩
3
6.67%
😨
3
6.67%
💯
2
4.44%
⚡
1
2.22%
👀
1
2.22%
👍
1
2.22%
😭
1
2.22%
🤔
1
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝘚𝘵𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘕𝘢𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯
— Прикиньте, он заметил меня! Это самый лучший день в моей жизни!!!
— Ну Вы только посмотрите, что он вытворяет, негодяй.
— А я нарисовал арт со Стивом, где бы мне показать?..
Тебе нравится великолепный фронтмен, вокалист и один из создателей великой группы And One? Нам тоже. И это место для тебя, ведь здесь ты можешь поделиться своей любовью к нему тоже!
✰. Наш DNI лист
✰. Бот для тейков:
…
.~ 😉
🔤роходит набор в админы!
😫 — 🔤лин, никто из знакомых не шарит за хф...
😡 — 🅰️оже, где норм контент по хф?!
😞 — 🎀ак жаль, что фандом умер...
Умер? Нет!
😀 🔤обро пожаловать в
✨🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️✨
👣🌨️🪽🦋🌧️🖤🖤🌧️🦋🪽🌨️👣
🤩 🔤десь вы можете: обсудить лор, поделиться своими хедканонами, показать свои арты или видео и многое другое!
Оформа тейков: < • - 🧚♀ - • >
(Кликабельна)
Всем здравствуйте!
Столкнулась с довольно странной и неожиданной ситуацией. Мне хотят передать роль владелицы ролевой по зверолюдям. Я вообще приходила туда как обычная участница, чтобы ролить и помогала с пиаром только потому, что хотела больше соигроков лично для себя. В итоге всё как-то резко повернулось вот так 🔄.
Пока я ещё ничего окончательно не решила и сама разбираюсь, что вообще происходит внутри. Но, уже по…
⠀сап! нахожусь в поисках активного сорола. ролю ориджинал, слэш (яой, млм), онли за универсальную позицию.🙌
⠀хочу уточнить, что активный человек для меня это тот, кто будет заинтересован в нашей ролевой, будет дропать посты не раз в день, а так же на постоянной основе присылать какие-нибудь ассоциации по нашим персонажам. так же, помимо непосредственно сорола, хотелось бы видеть неплохого приятеля, с которым можно бу…
[🎀] :: есть ли у вас разделение на мало- средне- и многострок? если да, то как разделяете? по какому количеству слов/символов или вообще по строчкам или экранам?
неанон Шелли
#вопрос
[🎀] :: Какой ваш САМЫЙ НЕЛЮБИМЫЙ тип персонажей в ориджинал ролевых. Пожалуйста без банальщины вроде сьюхи, персонажи без логики в прописи, супер сильных персонажей, плохо прописанные персонажи и т.п.
Неанон Тайломус
#вопрос
[🎀] :: Норм или стрём придумать персонажа, а после его просто подстраивать под разные сюжеты, не привязывая к одной вселенной? Или лучше для каждого сюжета придумывать отдельного героя?
#вопрос
🦄2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @originalconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑫𝒆𝒓 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒅 | 𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏.” (@originalconf), 66 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/originalconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
