Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Орловский Артур

Channel

Орловский Артур

@orlovskyartur

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,652subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071718807
TypeChannel
Username@orlovskyartur
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/orlovskyartur

Growth

1,6521,6751,663.55 August 2026 — 1,674 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,674 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,675 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,668 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,665 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,664 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,661 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,659 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,655 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,652 subscribers5 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,649–1,678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:391,652-3
2 Sept 2026, 06:031,655-4
30 Aug 2026, 07:581,659-2
27 Aug 2026, 13:071,661-2
24 Aug 2026, 03:371,663-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:221,665+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:581,664-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:551,665-3
11 Aug 2026, 21:061,668-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:051,675+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:171,674no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:121,674first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

371 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13837.2%
👍8121.8%
😱4913.2%
🤣369.70%
🏆267.01%
💩174.58%
custom 5294487906121953049133.50%
😢61.62%
🎄51.35%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC124 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Смотрите ли вы контекст, снятый на очки мета?

  1. Да, у меня у самого такие.7%
  2. Да, выглядит прикольно.30%
  3. +/- без разницы.52%
  4. Нет, шляпа4%
  5. Нет, меня укачивает.7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Артур Орловский

1 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC275 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

10 месяц. Детский. Прошлые посты: Старт | 23.11.25 | 02.12.25 | 08.12.25 | 18.12.25 | 05.01.26 | 02.02.26 | 02.03.26 | 01.04.26 (6 месяц) | 03.05.26 (7 месяц) | 01.06.26 (8 месяц) | 01.07.26 (9 месяц) | Пополнения: 260 502,14₽ В т.ч. 01.08 (+ 15000 ₽) Оценка: 246 969₽ Просадка по портфелю -5%. Стало по лучше. Но мы продолжаем…. Про пополнения 1. 15к пополнили мы с Машей, так как новый месяц. 2. Также Ради

👍54🏆2

Signed Артур Орловский

28 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC302 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

12:00-13:30 19:00-20:30 Вот это я понимаю, график работы общепита!

🤣12💩3🏆2

Signed Артур Орловский

1 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC476 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

9 месяц. Детский. Прошлые посты: Старт | 23.11.25 | 02.12.25 | 08.12.25 | 18.12.25 | 05.01.26 | 02.02.26 | 02.03.26 | 01.04.26 (6 месяц) | 03.05.26 (7 месяц) | 01.06.26 (8 месяц) Пополнения: 245 502,14₽ В т.ч. 01.07 (+ 15000 ₽) Оценка: 229 604₽ Просадка по портфелю ~8,5%. Не ужасно, но и не газ. В целом рынок упал на 20% Но стоит в очередной раз подумать, на каком месте стоит благосостояние людей в текущем мир

8👍3😱2🏆1💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

28 Jun 2026, 06:56 UTC404 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Эта цепочка, получилась не такой интересной! Так бывает! Хороших выходных!

😢63💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

27 Jun 2026, 06:45 UTC367 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Конечно, смотреть золото к доллару - не показатель того, сколько можно покупать. Но чуть-чуть поискав, оказывается. «одна унция золота покупала около 350 буханок хлеба ещё во времена Вавилона и покупает примерно столько же сегодня» Ну и: «в начале XX века хорошее мужское пальто или костюм стоили примерно 1 унцию золота; сегодня качественный костюм с обувью также обходится примерно в стоимость 1 унции золота.» Но

26👍11🏆10🤣5💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

26 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTC264 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конечно надо учитывать, что все 3 вопроса взаимосвязаны. Как сохранить, т.е. это сохранить покупательскую способность 1. Противостоять инфляции 2. Противостоять изъему от гос-ва И еще много, много, много. Пунктов (уже когда написал два, понял что там можно писать и писать) Но к чему мы приходим? Что если строить финансовый подход на теоретической проработке всех плюсов и минусов их прописывать. То жизни не хвати

👍26😱13custom 529448790612195304912💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

26 Jun 2026, 11:14 UTC262 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хотел до разобрать про экспертменты. Но давайте кратко суть. Что вместо того, чтобы двигаться мини шагами и проверять свои гипотезы. Законы вводятся без тестов и оглядок. За это, приходится платить. Вопрос не в том, что конкретный или все законы плохие. А в том, что система работает тупо и без экспериментов и проверок. Именно так работала средневековая медицина. Из-за этой системной ошибки у государств растет

10🎄5🏆5💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

25 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC267 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Степень моего разочарования в финансах дошла до предела. И вот вопросы, на которые я хочу найти ответы: - Как сохранить? - Как преумножить? - Как не потерять? Есть еще такие проблемы, как - фомо (другой вложил лучше) - ожидание прибыли (думал вложу и будет прибыль) - отложенный эффект (результат позже действия) Кажется, что вопросы банальны. Просты. Это же основы. Но те ответы, которые предлагают курсы/продукты п

43👍14😱13🏆3💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

24 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC267 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новая цепочка постов, размышлений по финансам. 50 реакций и стартуем. Прошлую можно перечитать начиная отсюда

42👍17😱16💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

23 Jun 2026, 15:57 UTC288 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rzhomba007Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍5🤣5😱2💩1custom 52944879061219530491

Signed Артур Орловский

14 Jun 2026, 14:28 UTC427 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @onlyfits_clubPhoto

В честь соревнований Дианы открываем предзапись на 48 часов ⏰ Ровно два дня чтоб вступить в клуб по лучшей цене ➡️Успей занять место и начать пусть к тому самому телу мечты в комфортном темпе и с лучшим приложением [ЗАНЯТЬ МЕСТО]

🏆3😱32💩1

Signed Артур Орловский

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @orlovskyartur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

Смотрите ли вы контекст, снятый на очки мета?

  1. Да, у меня у самого такие.7%
  2. Да, выглядит прикольно.30%
  3. +/- без разницы.52%
  4. Нет, шляпа4%
  5. Нет, меня укачивает.7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Орловский Артур” (@orlovskyartur), 1,652 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orlovskyartur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.