Channel
@orusskomlegko
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
44subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002508717652 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orusskomlegko |
| Description | Рассказываю о русском языке с легкостью и любовью |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orusskomlegko |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 44 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 44 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 27.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 16.9% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 13.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orusskomlegko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2025 to 5 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Обожаю видео о русском этого блогера. И да! Корни с чередованием - это одна из тем, которую «собираю» летом. Изучение темы размазано на 5-6 класс в течение всего учебного года. Получаются отрывочные знания по принципу «зазубри и забудь» (можно пропеть на мелодию из мультфильма Frozen). Часть корней, написание которых выходит на экзамены, вообще непонятно как и когда изучаются. Поэтому лето - самое время собрать и с…
😁4
Когда немного отдохнул, появляются силы о чем-то рассказать. Самые частые вопросы ко мне как методисту и репетитору задаются о занятиях летом. Надо заниматься или отдыхать летом? Я за занятия в облегченном режиме, то есть без домашних заданий. Исключение - надо реально оттренировать самостоятельно разобранное в течение занятия. Но это редко. Зачем? 1. Мозг - аналог мышцы. Больше тренируешь - легче работает. Но я з…
👍1
Улыбнитесь )
❤6😁4🔥2🤣1
Вы дали верный ответ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Написание Н и НН в именах прилагательных, образованных от существительных, — одна из самых вроде бы простых тем, однако опыт показывает, что это одна из завальных тем для шестиклассников. С каждым учеником любого класса изучаем эту тему заново или тренируем до бесконечности... Свела в единую таблицу правило.
👍3❤2🤯1
Выберите строчку(-и), в которой(-ых) в обоих словах пропушенны одинаковые буквы
The shares total 207%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mpj-JMW8cJHt2XS3A-d0kdeuGCDdLOpgQPCUbKJCz2w/edit?usp=drivesdk 📝 По этой ссылке можно скачать скомпелированный вариант диагностической работы для 9 класса. В нем нет заведомо неизученных на данный момент правил (особых знаков препинания в сложном предложении). ✔️ Ответы я тоже не даю, чтобы нельзя было списать тем, кто выполняет. ✅ Если вас интересует проверка выполнения, напиши…
Не могу не поделиться. Взято мной у Марины Охлопковой. По моему мнению, очень понятный вариант прогнозируемого результата на ЕГЭ в зависимости от характера и успешности ученика. Если стремитесь к большему баллу, то придется приложить дополнительные ресурсы: силы, время, финансы… А вы как думаете, похоже?
👍5👏2
Я выпала 🙈 Надо же было поймать сильное обострение остеохондроза с жутким спазмом мышцы 😭 и как следствие зажимом всего, что можно… и мигренеобразными болями… И работа нашей бесплатной системы здравоохранения просто убивает 😭 ✍️ Напишите, пожалуйста, в комментарии или личным сообщением, кому выслать диагностику ЕГЭ по русскому (11 класс). 📝 Сам файл с диагностикой будет моим запоздавшим подарком к началу учебного…
❤2❤🔥2👍2🔥2
Нужна ли диагностическая работа? 📝
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
До начала учебного года остается неделя. Родители запасаются успокоительными… Учителя настраиваются впихивать ценные знания в головы детей… 9-ти и 11-то классники задумываются об экзаменах… А хотите получить экземпляр диагностической работы в формате ОГЭ и/или ЕГЭ по русскому языку для себя или своих детей?
❤🔥3❤2🔥1
Получила результаты диагностики ЕГЭ, которую писала на прошлой неделе. Две ошибки (задание 17 - разошлась в понимании роли союза НО - соединяет однородные сказуемые или присоединяет деепричастный оборот, противопоставляя добавочное действие основному; задание 26 - средства связи, для меня странно, так как точно нашла предложение с союзом, однокоренным словом и повтором слова, могла ошибиться на нервах в записи номера…
🔥5👍3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @orusskomlegko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы дали верный ответ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Выберите строчку(-и), в которой(-ых) в обоих словах пропушенны одинаковые буквы
The shares total 207%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Нужна ли диагностическая работа? 📝
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 5 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“И снова о русском” (@orusskomlegko), 44 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orusskomlegko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.