Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗼𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁á 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼

Channel

𝗼𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁á 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼

@oscurita1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004270396869
TypeChannel
Username@oscurita1
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 26 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oscurita1

Growth

171817.59 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18 subscribers9 August 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 13:5718+1
11 Aug 2026, 19:4617no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:1717first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026

Поздравляю вас, дальше больше ❤️

10 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @fates777

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Дорогие друзья! Нас стало целая сотня, и сей факт несказанно радует мое сердце. Благодарю каждого, кто присоединился к нашему скромному собранию. Дабы праздные часы проходили приятнее, я открыла этот канал для легких бесед и дружеского обмена мыслями. Здесь мы будем обсуждать новости, делиться занятными изображениями и просто коротать время в хорошей компании. Прошу лишь об одном: сохраняйте любезность и не

9 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @freaku_housPhoto

Прошу внимательно к прочтению!!!! Эти личности были у меня во флуде,их пригласил или нашел Сет(админ по чату и Нью) он сам нормик,вышел из-за проблемы там,но не суть. Эти данные личности были за роли " каин и мальбонте" Сами же они общались странно очень "как те подростки возле гаражей с их сленгами". Потом они начали агрится и с матами общаться как ушел сет. У нас флуд активный,и игры,и ньюшки и т д Просьба большая

9 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @freaku_hous

Поменялось наше инфо: — банеры — повысилась норма — изменены правила Ждём оценку в комментарии,мои родные и реакции !!! #рп

27 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC150 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

😅𝙒𝙚𝙡𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝗼𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁á Мы открылись И ищем союзы и души, способные оценить эстетику мрачной роскоши. Станьте частью великой ночной мистерии. Готовы ли вы переступить порог? А ещё нам очень нужны админы из админов у нас есть только: Владелец Так что любой админ нам в радость🌟 Много свободных ролей Наш инфо Бот для вступления тут #рп #osrp

1

27 Jul 2026, 05:11 UTC44 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚🌟✩ ₊𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙩₊˚🌟⊹♡ Название флуда 🤩🤩«𝗼𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁á» и его формы принадлежат нам и используются нами с 25.07.2026. Любое сходство не допускается.🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟Просьба уважать авторские права и не использовать без разрешения.

26 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚🌟✩ ₊𝙍𝙤𝙡𝙚𝙨₊˚🌟⊹♡ Список занятых ролей Admins-🕯️ Booking(бронь) -🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝘊𝘭𝘶𝘣 𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤 🌟Теодора Теодора🕯️ 🌟Секрет небес(реквием, 1,2,3) Лэйн Анна Голод Каин Вики 🕯️Пришествие№3 Райна 🌟Сага о грозах 🌟Разбитое сердце астреии Рафаил Одри 🌟Аверис Раэль 🌟Грешный лондон Ирэн 👼Атака титанов Хизер 𝘚𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 🌹Дитя бездны Фелан 🦊Морвейн 🤩Цепи договора 🤩Последние желание злодейки Элиза🌟

26 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

‧₊˚🗽✩ ₊𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨₊˚🌟⊹♡ Незнание правил не освобождает вас от ответственности 🌟 Чиᴄᴛᴋᴀ и нᴏᴩʍᴀ Чиᴄᴛᴋᴀ будᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏхᴏдиᴛь ᴋᴀждᴏᴇ ʙᴏᴄᴋᴩᴇᴄᴇньᴇ ʙ 21:00 ᴨᴏ ʍᴄᴋ. Ꮋᴏᴩʍᴀ 100 ᴄᴏᴏ ʙ нᴇдᴇᴧю 🌟 Ꮲᴇᴄᴛ Пᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ᴩᴇᴄᴛᴀ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ʙ ᴧичныᴇ ᴄᴏᴏбщᴇния ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧьцу иᴧи ᴄᴏʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧьцу. Ꭺᴩᴇᴄᴛ ʍᴏжнᴏ ʙɜяᴛь ʍᴀᴋᴄиʍуʍ дᴏ 2 нᴇдᴇᴧь (ʙ ɜᴀʙиᴄиʍᴏᴄᴛи ᴏᴛ ᴄиᴛуᴀции ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧᴇц ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏдᴧиᴛь ʙᴀʍ ᴩᴇᴄᴛ) Ꭲᴀᴋжᴇ ᴩᴇᴄᴛ ʍᴏжнᴏ бᴩᴀᴛь 1 ᴩᴀɜ ʙ ʍᴇᴄяц. 🌟 Ꮶᴏнɸᴧиᴋᴛы Ꮯᴄᴏᴩы ʙ чᴀᴛᴇ ɜᴀᴨᴩᴇщᴇ

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @oscurita1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗼𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁á 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼” (@oscurita1), 18 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oscurita1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.