Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⋆˚𝜗 Осколок сети 𝜚˚⋆

Channel

⋆˚𝜗 Осколок сети 𝜚˚⋆

@oskolok_ceti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002532084486
TypeChannel
Username@oskolok_ceti
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oskolok_ceti

Growth

163188175.56 August 2026 — 163 subscribers8 August 2026 — 163 subscribers15 August 2026 — 166 subscribers21 August 2026 — 177 subscribers28 August 2026 — 185 subscribers5 September 2026 — 187 subscribers13 September 2026 — 188 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 04:19188+1
5 Sept 2026, 20:56187+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:34185+8
21 Aug 2026, 12:16177+11
15 Aug 2026, 04:15166+3
8 Aug 2026, 16:31163no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:45163first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53799300141185842773822.0%
custom 53100326726664420243520.2%
custom 53774026277283518542212.7%
❤‍🔥179.83%
💘179.83%
custom 5247139924657863756116.36%
custom 526044490011722088884.62%
💔84.62%
🕊63.47%
😢52.89%
custom 524464470327771022421.16%
custom 532587861520262527321.16%
21.16%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC40 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chocolatamurPhoto

🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 🤩 🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 🤩С днём великой лени и котиков ~ Сегодня день моего рождения и день становления косплеером 😏 Большое спасибо всем, кто всё ещё со мной и всем тем, кто решил присоединиться недавно. Ваша поддержка помогает мне не опускать руки и работать ещё над образами усерднее 🥺 Хочу пожелать себе сделать ещё больше образов в новом году жизни, не опускать руки и стать

custom 53799300141185842775custom 537740262772835185432custom 52446447032777102242

7 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC89 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌸🎀🌟🌟🌟🎀🌟 🐙 🤩🤩🤩🍼 🍼 🍼 🌟🌟🤩Я с нетерпением жду 🌟🌟 истории, которую мы напишем вместе🤩 ꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚꒷︶꒷꒥꒷‧₊˚ 🌟🍼𝑷𝒉 🤩 𝙆𝙖𝙧𝙞 •┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈┈•┈┈┈•

❤‍🔥10custom 53799300141185842779custom 52604449001172208884custom 53774026277283518544custom 53258786152026252732🕊1

5 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC78 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53100326726664420249💘5custom 53774026277283518544custom 53799300141185842772🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC110 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩Кто-то в анонимке спрашивал будет ли косплей на кого-то из бензопилы. 🩵Ну похоже твоё желание сбылось хахах 🤍 Надеюсь чел доволен 🤩🤩 🌟🤩Вот кстати анонимка моя 🤩 http://t.me/voprosy?start=6l8eq2c 🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲🔲 🤩 Пока разговорник записать не смогу как хотела, я пока в процессе переезда... Думаю тут письменно поотвечать, ибо тут много новеньких, а я мало говорю о себе в отличие от косплея ✅А потом видик сделать как

❤‍🔥7custom 53100326726664420244🕊3custom 53774026277283518543custom 53799300141185842771

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC216 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🎀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🍼🍼🍼🍼🍼🍼🤩 🦷🦴 «Ты кто — городская мышь или деревенская?» 🌟 Ph🎀@sd_of_sa 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

💘12custom 53799300141185842779custom 52471399246578637567custom 53100326726664420243custom 53774026277283518541

31 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC104 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟Траур отменён! Завтра ждите че нить Стоило только пожаловаться в инете..... 🤩 Первая десятка после проигрыша. Я невероятно рада, для меня ранние леги это большущая редкость. Теперь точно думаю её косплеить 🤩 🩵Теперь копить на костюм и в игре и в ирл... 🤩🤩

custom 53100326726664420249custom 52471399246578637564custom 52604449001172208884custom 53774026277283518542custom 53799300141185842772

30 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC107 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟Постов не будет, у меня траур 🤩 🤍 Я проиграла 50/50 на Рамиэлле((( 🐇🐇🐇 Ну хоть на бесплатную Люси гляньте🌟🌟

💔8custom 53100326726664420246😢5

29 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC181 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩵🤩✨✨✨✨✨✨✨.... ☝️ Ну что ж начеркаю небольшой отзыв. Сугубо моё личное мнение 🤩 🎀Сам фест по организации был немного сомнительный. 🎀Программу сместили на час из-за наплыва народа и к сожалению это состакалось с плохой погодой, что вызвало толкучку и парилку внутри... 🎀Фотографы кроме пары вообще не зашли, поэтому даже не хотела у них фоткаться. Особенно добила фотозона от феста с шакальным иишным фоном... Позор ёб

custom 537993001411858427710custom 53774026277283518545custom 53100326726664420244🕊1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @oskolok_ceti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋆˚𝜗 Осколок сети 𝜚˚⋆” (@oskolok_ceti), 188 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oskolok_ceti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.