Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лаборатория Бельге

Channel

Лаборатория Бельге

@ostalf_lab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

824subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007795737
TypeChannel
Username@ostalf_lab
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ostalf_lab

Growth

823840831.56 August 2026 — 840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 840 subscribers16 August 2026 — 831 subscribers24 August 2026 — 823 subscribers31 August 2026 — 824 subscribers8246 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 06:28824+1
24 Aug 2026, 00:27823-8
16 Aug 2026, 02:05831-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:02840no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:17840first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6837.8%
custom 53866465913502515193620.0%
custom 57785708525555591813217.8%
😢1910.6%
custom 5199620488099277274137.22%
custom 539120769199978061473.89%
custom 538406798318004594321.11%
🔥21.11%
😁10.556%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не зря взял бесплатную Энби 0.

9

29 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC307 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😶 Итоги стрима. Выбил два раза Ремиэллу и её сигну, но в процессе проиграл два раза. А также выбил банбу и Рину в стандартном баннере. Всем спасибо. Следующий стрим будет в неизвестном будущем. #стрим@ostalf_lab

10custom 53840679831800459431

29 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC300 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Запустил стрим игры. Присоединяйтесь: https://www.twitch.tv/ostalf_lab

custom 538664659135025151931🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC299 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я запущу стрим ZZZ в 18:35~ (МСК). #стрим@ostalf_lab

custom 538664659135025151961🔥1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC501 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я долго пытался подобрать название своему состоянию. Апатия, депрессия безразличие, бессилие — всё не совсем то. Вероятно, это просто глубокое утомление. Я давно отвык от нормального сна, спокойствия, расслабленности и ощущения свободы. И дело не столько в проектах, сколько в накопившихся обстоятельствах, обязательствах и последствиях решений, с которыми приходится разбираться. За внешним спокойствием всё чаще стоит

😢19custom 538664659135025151993

20 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC597 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Что-ж, стрим по Silver Palace будет. #silver_palace@ostalf_lab

19custom 57785708525555591814

19 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC525 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Карусели это здорово, но само обновление всё ещё выдаёт ошибки. Пока не вижу смысла адаптироваться под новое форматирование. #мысли@ostalf_lab

custom 53912076919997806147custom 57785708525555591812

17 Jul 2026, 20:49 UTC560 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Говорят, что порядок на столе — залог порядка в голове. Как я убедился, единственный плюс порядка на столе в том, что ты с первой попытки можешь найти всё необходимое. На деле порядок в голове возникает лишь тогда, когда ты перестаёшь отдавать себя импульсам каждой мысли и распыляться на множество дел. Если же в голове жуткая каша, лучшее решение — немного поспать. Сон позволяет сбросить часть настроек и после пробу

20custom 51996204880992772742custom 57785708525555591811

16 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC588 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я практически не пью энергетическую дрянь, но, увидев энергетик в коллаборации с Кизуной Ай, не сдержался. Напиток имеет яркий, но мягкий цветочный вкус. Хорошо ощущаются сакура и энергетический привкус, свойственный Monster и Red Bull. Но часто такой напиток не попьешь, ибо вкус может быстро приесться. Он не из тех, что «на постоянку». В общем, для меня интересный опыт, ранее такого вообще не пробовал. #покупки@os

custom 5778570852555559181155

15 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC487 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Рафик часто помогает с красивыми обложками. Кидаю респект и рекомендую к работе. #проекты@ostalf_lab

custom 519962048809927727411custom 57785708525555591814custom 53866465913502515191

15 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC500 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немного моих картинок для розыгрышей сетки INFO 🤨

custom 538664659135025151917custom 57785708525555591816custom 53840679831800459431

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ostalf_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 342,713 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лаборатория Бельге” (@ostalf_lab), 824 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ostalf_lab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.