Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عصیان| گاه نوشته های عباس طاهری

Channel

عصیان| گاه نوشته های عباس طاهری

@osyaan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001035279326
TypeChannel
Username@osyaan
Created10 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/osyaan

Growth

2242262256 August 2026 — 225 subscribers7 August 2026 — 225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 226 subscribers21 August 2026 — 225 subscribers7 September 2026 — 224 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 224–226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 19:38224-1
21 Aug 2026, 13:03225-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:13226+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:02225no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:52225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1140.7%
👍725.9%
😭622.2%
👏13.70%
😁13.70%
🤔13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,670 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

پیام تشکر مقام معظم رهبری بعد از تشییع امروز @osyaan

1🤔1

5 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,670 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

من خود به چشم خویشتن دیدم که جانم می‌رود... @osyaan

1😭1

30 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,030 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ما را به سخت جانی خود این گمان نبود

😭51

18 Jun 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خامنه ای که هیچی فکر کنم خمینی هم جوان شده😊

2

7 Jun 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,160 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَ آلِهِ ، وَ حَصِّنْ ثُغُورَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ بِعِزَّتِكَ ، وَ أَيِّدْ حُمَاتَهَا بِقُوَّتِكَ ، وَ أَسْبِغْ عَطَايَاهُمْ مِنْ جِدَتِكَ.اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ عَلَى مُحَمَّدٍ وَ آلِهِ ، وَ كَثِّرْ عِدَّتَهُمْ ، وَ اشْحَذْ أَسْلِحَتَهُمْ ، وَ احْرُسْ حَوْزَتَهُمْ ، وَ امْنَعْ حَوْمَتَهُمْ ، وَ أَلِّفْ جَمْعَهُمْ ، وَ دَبِّرْ أَمْرَهُمْ ، وَ وَاتِرْ بَيْنَ مِيَرِهِمْ ، وَ تَوَحَّدْ بِكِفَايَةِ

4

17 May 2026, 17:35 UTC910 viewsread 7 August 2026

آشوب،ترور و یک جنگ روانی آرام ⭕️ مدت زمان مطالعه ۴ تا ۵ دقیقه در میان سوال‌هایی که امروز در ذهن همه تکرار می‌شود،یک سوال خیلی پرتکرار است. چه می‌شود؟ و کی جنگ می‌کنیم؟ از منظر مطالعات ارتباطات، آنچه بیش از هر سناریوی مشخصی اهمیت دارد، مدیریت فضای روایت است. جنگ امروز، پیش از آنکه در سواحل خلیج فارس یا تأسیسات هسته‌ای شکل بگیرد، در ذهن مخاطب ساخته می‌شود. برای همین، بازوی پنهان اما همیشه فعال این درگیری، جنگ روانی ا

11 May 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,210 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

آن‌ها دیگر نمی‌خندند... توییت امشب دونالد ترامپ ناگهان مرا به یاد یکی از تاریک‌ترین لحظات تاریخ انداخت. به یاد آن سخنرانی مشهور آدولف هیتلر که در آن، نفرت آرام‌آرام از مرز کلمات عبور کرد و به سرنوشت ملت‌ها رسید. هیتلر نیز روزگاری درباره یهودیان از همین عبارت استفاده کرد: «آن‌ها دیگر نمی‌خندند» و امروز، همان جمله دوباره از زبان ترامپ تکرار شد. شاید بسیاری این را صرفاً یک تشابه لفظی بدانند. اما بدبینی نهادینه‌شده د

👍3

10 May 2026, 18:21 UTC893 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

هَسبارا و تماس‌های مرگبار؛ وقتی هشدار تبدیل به شکنجه می‌شود ⭕️مدت زمان مطالعه حدود ۵ دقیقه ⭕️ این روزها در برخی شبکه‌های اجتماعی و کانال‌های فارسی‌زبان، روایتی دست‌به‌دست می‌شود از تماسی که پیش از یک حمله صورت گرفته؛ تماسی از سوی اسرائیل با کسی که چند دقیقه بعد هدف قرار می‌گیرد. اما ماجرا فقط محدود به یک عملیات نظامی نیست. آنچه در این میان بازتولید می‌شود، شکلی از جنگ روانی است که در آن «اخلاق» بهانه‌ای می‌شود برای

1

7 May 2026, 18:55 UTC662 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سکوت به سبک ضربات کاری به گفته مهدی محمدی، پریشب آمریکا تلاش کرده با ایجاد چتر هوایی، چهار ناوشکن و چند کشتی را از تنگه هرمز عبور بدهد. نتیجه: هر چهار ناوشکن مورد اصابت قرار گرفته‌اند، دو فروند از آنها در سواحل صخره‌ای جنوب خلیج فارس به گل نشسته‌اند، و کشتی فرانسوی که اسکورت می‌شده نیز هدف قرار گرفته است. اگر این درگیری واقعاً رخ داده باشد، اتفاقی بسیار مهم است و سکوت رسانه‌ای در قبال آن به شدت عجیب. به نظر می‌رسد را

👍2

4 May 2026, 10:54 UTC818 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

به ادعای خودمان یکی دو روز پیش، گزارشی از مجموعه رصدی منظومه را مرور می‌کردم. گزارشی فنی، بی‌حاشیه، و قوی! نه از جنس کارهای روتینی که سال‌هاست در میان برخی گروه‌های تحلیل رسانه دست به دست می‌شود. چند نکته اش بیشتر از همیشه به دلم نشست. شاید برای اینکه این روزها دیگر کسی حوصله آمار و ارقام را ندارد، اما این آمارها از جنس همان چیزهایی هستند که خیلی از ما ترجیح می‌دهیم نبینیم. بیش از هفتاد درصد ارجاعات خبری در سه بستر ا

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @osyaan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عصیان| گاه نوشته های عباس طاهری” (@osyaan), 224 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osyaan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.