Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1С-Отчетность. Здесь все о сдаче отчетности

Channel

1С-Отчетность. Здесь все о сдаче отчетности

@otchetnoct_1c

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,760subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005497110
TypeChannel
Username@otchetnoct_1c
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/otchetnoct_1c

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,74910,79810,773.57 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,796 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,794 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,794 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,789 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,785 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,780 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,778 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,777 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,775 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,767 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,764 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,762 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,758 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,760 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,758 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,750 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,749 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,766 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,761 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,757 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,751 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,760 subscribers10,7607 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,742–10,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:3510,760+9
16 Sept 2026, 18:4210,751-6
14 Sept 2026, 19:2110,757-4
13 Sept 2026, 02:3810,761-5
11 Sept 2026, 03:1810,766+17
8 Sept 2026, 07:2110,749-1
5 Sept 2026, 02:1610,750-8
3 Sept 2026, 09:2510,758-2
2 Sept 2026, 04:2310,760+2
1 Sept 2026, 07:1810,758-4
31 Aug 2026, 03:5510,762-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:3510,763-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:1510,764-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:5710,767-4
27 Aug 2026, 03:2810,771-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:3310,775+4
24 Aug 2026, 22:2310,771-6
23 Aug 2026, 08:2710,777-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:5610,779+1
19 Aug 2026, 12:1210,778first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 10,760 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.862%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held19 (15 June 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total1,160
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10949.5%
🔥3917.7%
🙏3817.3%
👍219.55%
👌62.73%
👏20.909%
🎄10.455%
🐳10.455%
👀10.455%
👨‍💻10.455%
🤝10.455%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Рынок ЭДО и ЭПД на переломе: что важно знать бухгалтеру Логистика сейчас переживает самый интересный и одновременно сложный период за последние 10 лет. Рынок электронного документооборота меняется стремительно — и эти перемены напрямую влияют на работу бухгалтеров. Хотите понимать, куда движется рынок и как адаптироваться к изменениям — подписывайтесь на канал Степана Терехина, директора по развитию бизнеса ГК «Аст…

❤5🔥4🤝1

18 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,090 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @EPD_AstralPhoto

Меньше двух недель до обязательного ЭТрН — и всё ещё много вопросов без ответов С 1 сентября вступают в силу требования по 140-ФЗ. Как будут проходить проверки, кто и за что штрафует, что с переходным периодом, интернетом в регионах и безопасностью данных — рынок это спрашивает, но чётких ответов пока нет. 📣 20 августа в 10:00 (МСК) собираем на одной площадке представителей Минтранса, ФНС и Ассоциации «Цифровой тра…

❤6🔥4👏1👨‍💻1

17 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈2,370 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔈 УСН и НДС в 2026 года: что делать, если превысили лимит Лимит в 20 млн считается нарастающим итогом — компания может «слететь» на НДС в любой месяц. И тогда бухгалтеру нужно быстро решить: какую ставку выбрать, как считать налоговую базу, что делать со счетами-фактурами и вычетами. Ошибка здесь стоит реальных денег. На БЕСПЛАТНОМ вебинаре Надежда Самкова разберёт всю цепочку по порядку. 📅 10 сентября, 10:00 (МС…

❤5

5 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈3,200 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚀 Новый канал поддержки «1С: Отчетность» в MAX для пользователей сервиса Мы создали этот чат, чтобы сделать нашу помощь еще доступнее и удобнее для вас. В чате работает ИИ-помощник 💫, обученный на реальных обращениях. По типовым вопросам он дает быстрый ответ. Если вопрос нестандартный, то помощник сразу же подключит к диалогу нашего технического специалиста. 📍Привычные каналы поддержки продолжают работать. 💬 Отк…

❤1

31 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈3,720 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

⏱ Готова запись вебинара с Марией Демашевой по теме: «ЕНС в 1С:Бухгалтерия — новые правила 2026» Посмотреть можно ➡️ ЗДЕСЬ На вебинаре разобрали: ✅ Два алгоритма учёта ЕНП — с интеграцией ЛК ЕНС и без неё ✅ Что изменилось в документе «Корректировка ЕНС» ✅ Какие налоги 1С разнесёт на 68.90 автоматически, а что заполнять вручную ✅ Почему из Закрытия месяца пропали привычные проводки — и как теперь работают «Операции…

❤6🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈3,550 views0 reactionsread 1 September 2026

💳 ЧЕРЕЗ 2 МИНУТЫ вебинар «ЕНС в 1С:Бухгалтерия: с 2026 года всё по-новому». ➡️УСПЕЙТЕ ЗАРЕГИСТРИРОВАТЬСЯ

27 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC≈4,140 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026

‼️ Уже 29 ИЮЛЯ вебинар «ЕНС в 1С:Бухгалтерия: с 2026 года всё по-новому». ➡️ РЕГИСТРАЦИЯ

❤5

20 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈15,400 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

С 1 сентября 2026 года ЭПД становится обязательным. Что меняется в учёте? 22 июля в 10-00 на Большом обучении по ЭПД Надежда Самкова — ведущий эксперт-консультант по налогообложению, член Палаты налоговых консультантов — разберёт с участниками, что важно знать уже сейчас Что меняется с 1 сентября 2026 года 1️. Как устроен электронный перевозочный документ 2️. ЭПД как первичный учётный документ 3️. Как ЭПД влияет н…

❤17

16 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈4,350 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔴ЕНС в 1С:Бухгалтерия: с 2026 года всё по-новому Изменился документ «Корректировка ЕНС», поменялся порядок отражения налогов, пеней и штрафов. Если 1С не интегрирована с ЛК ЕНС — часть операций теперь придётся вести вручную, а это время и риск ошибок. 29 июля, 10-00(МСК) — бесплатный вебинар, где мы разберём: ✅ Два алгоритма учёта ЕНП — с интеграцией ЛК ЕНС и без неё ✅ Что изменилось в документе «Корректировка ЕНС»…

🔥11❤5👍4

14 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,670 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔥🔥 🔥 БЕСПЛАТНОЕ ОБУЧЕНИЕ ПО ЭПД от оператора № 1 в реестре Минтранса Готовьтесь к переходу на ЭПД с профи С 1 сентября 2026 года — только электронные перевозочные документы. Бумага уходит в прошлое. Это требование Федерального закона № 140-ФЗ Если ваша компания участвует в перевозках — это касается вас напрямую. Неважно, вы грузоотправитель, перевозчик, экспедитор или получатель. ЭПД — это про всех Разобраться в …

🔥10❤6👍1

9 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC≈3,830 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

📺 Готова запись вебинара по теме: «Июльская отчетность: сдаем в срок и уходим домой вовремя» Посмотреть можно ➡️ ЗДЕСЬ На вебинаре разобрали: — Сверка ЕНС. Где обычно теряется время на сверку и как автоматическая проверка закрывает этот риск. — Отчётность для особых случаев. Нулевая, УСН/АУСН/ПСН и ликвидация — как сдавать быстро, даже если таких клиентов целый портфель — Выгодные условия для бухгалтерских фирм. …

❤11👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @otchetnoct_1c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@otchetnoct_1c edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бухэксперт
@buhexpert8 · 75,798
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Бухучет, налоги, 1С
@buhru · 35,379
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Канал "Учёт без забот"
@uchetbezzabot_1c · 39,649
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
1С для бухгалтера ❤️
@buhi1c · 37,935
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Контур для бухгалтера
@externjournal · 43,297
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Нетипичный бухгалтер 🥇
@netipichniy_buh · 78,469
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Ряховский: Налоги без фильтра
@ryahovskiynalogii · 35,349
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Евгения Мемрук бухгалтер
@biznesinalogi_tlg · 82,355
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1С-Отчетность. Здесь все о сдаче отчетности” (@otchetnoct_1c), 10,760 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otchetnoct_1c.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.