Channel
@otknews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,655subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001327057332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otknews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otknews |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 2,655 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 2,656 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 2,660 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 2,671 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 2,675 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 2,676 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 2,677 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 2,678 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 2,673 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 2,675 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:41 | 2,678 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 2,677 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
93 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 26.9% | |
| ⚡ | 21 | 22.6% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔎 Сможете отличить настоящий документ от подделки? Мы подготовили небольшую игру, в которой вы можете попробовать себя в роли эксперта ОТК и потренироваться искать признаки подделки в документах. Вас ждут примеры с возможными следами фотошопа и других правок. Ваша задача заметить несостыковки раньше, чем они превратятся в риск. Внимательно изучайте детали, ищите подозрительные изменения и определяйте, где что-то не…
⚡3❤3🔥3
Зачем при проверке водителя смотреть кредитный рейтинг и может ли он повлиять на решение по перевозке? 👤 Отвечает Михаил Алтунин — учредитель ОТК. В ОТК есть дополнительная возможность проверить кредитный рейтинг водителя или сотрудника компании. Это информация из Бюро кредитных историй, которая позволяет увидеть финансовую нагрузку человека: действующие кредиты и займы, открытые кредитные карты, другие обязательст…
👍6⚡4🔥4
⚡️Проверки ОТК доступны прямо в TransTrade Теперь вы можете отправлять контрагентов на проверку в ОТК прямо из системы. Данные о перевозчике, транспорте и водителе подставятся автоматически. Дальше прямо в TransTrade можно следить за статусом проверки, а когда резолюция будет готова, система уведомит об этом. ✅Для подключения напишите в поддержку ОТК в Telegram или MAX либо в поддержку TransTrade. В нашу поддержку…
⚡6🔥4❤3
Для нас — удовольствие! 😁
🤣5🔥4❤3
Posted without readable text
🏁 Финальный вопрос викторины Последняя возможность проверить свою внимательность. Посмотрите видео, поставьте его на паузу перед обратным отсчётом и проголосуйте за вариант, который считаете верным. После голосования досмотрите видео и узнайте правильный ответ. Поделитесь в комментариях, на сколько вопросов из пяти вам удалось ответить верно! ✅
🔥2
Posted without readable text
⏳ Предпоследний вопрос Внимательно смотрите видео. Как только увидите вопрос и все варианты ответа, поставьте его на паузу до начала обратного отсчёта и выберите свой вариант в опросе. Затем продолжайте просмотр и проверяйте себя. Не спешите менять мнение в последний момент!
Коллеги, вы выйдете за нас? 💍 В логистике это не всегда признание в любви. Иногда это последняя попытка найти человека, который возьмёт на себя задачу, к которой вы морально не готовы. Собрали предложения, от которых сложно отказаться. Хотя очень хочется. Какая рабочая задача заставляет вас сразу искать глазами коллег? 👀
❤5⚡3🔥3
📦📦📦
🤣6❤3🔥3
Posted without readable text
🎯Вы добрались до середины викторины Посмотрите вопрос, остановите видео перед началом обратного отсчёта и проголосуйте в опросе. После этого возвращайтесь к видео за правильным ответом. Сколько верных ответов у вас уже набралось? Делитесь в комментариях!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @otknews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OTK News” (@otknews), 2,655 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otknews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.