Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Овсянкин

Channel

Овсянкин

@ovsyankintour

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45,408subscribers

+1,700 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474598738
TypeChannel
Username@ovsyankintour
Descriptionhttps://www.youtube.com/c/Овсянкинн https://spoti.fi/3ziOcxW https://soundcloud.com/ovsyankinn https://www.tiktok.com/@kirillovsyankin https://instagram.com/ovsyankinn
Created6 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ovsyankintour

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Овсянкин в турах не пишет песни — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

43,70845,40844,5586 August 2026 — 43,708 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,708 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,721 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,768 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,782 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,799 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,800 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,854 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,889 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,932 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,971 subscribers15 August 2026 — 44,001 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,024 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,041 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,043 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,067 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,086 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,108 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,110 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,115 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,109 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,107 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,120 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,136 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,153 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,617 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,775 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,972 subscribers7 September 2026 — 45,243 subscribers10 September 2026 — 45,321 subscribers12 September 2026 — 45,344 subscribers14 September 2026 — 45,334 subscribers15 September 2026 — 45,368 subscribers17 September 2026 — 45,408 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,700. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,453–45,663 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:3745,408+40
15 Sept 2026, 20:5845,368+34
14 Sept 2026, 05:3745,334-10
12 Sept 2026, 13:5945,344+23
10 Sept 2026, 13:0145,321+78
7 Sept 2026, 10:5845,243+271
4 Sept 2026, 11:5944,972+197
3 Sept 2026, 00:2544,775+158
1 Sept 2026, 21:2744,617+464
31 Aug 2026, 19:2544,153+17
30 Aug 2026, 18:3944,136+16
29 Aug 2026, 18:3644,120+13
28 Aug 2026, 15:0244,107-2
27 Aug 2026, 15:5444,109-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:1644,115+5
25 Aug 2026, 16:1444,110+2
24 Aug 2026, 15:4744,108+22
23 Aug 2026, 02:5744,086+19
21 Aug 2026, 11:5844,067+24
20 Aug 2026, 08:2244,043first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.3%
avg views ÷ 45,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,700
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held121 (30 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total996,780
Reactions total34,221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 07:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
225
Links
668

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
16m 55s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

65,245 reactions across 118 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536409140738656155865,245100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66,990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,561
across the posts below
Posts paid on
98
of 121 we hold a reading for · 81%
Most on one post
1,310
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ovsyankintour. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTC≈7,020 views410 reactions1 Starread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @pornfatherisnotblindanymore

ты любишь моих врагов

custom 5364091407386561558410

21 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC≈8,700 views427 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Пo xogy бyдem дeлaть

custom 5364091407386561558427

21 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC≈8,900 views529 reactions8 Starsread 24 September 2026

А ты всех выкладываешь? Просто я так посмотрел, половина историй это просто случайно включившие камеру

custom 5364091407386561558529

21 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈8,990 views363 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Cлyшaть

custom 5364091407386561558363

21 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC≈9,190 views237 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5364091407386561558237

21 Sept 2026, 16:59 UTC≈9,130 views446 reactionsread 24 September 2026

20 тpeкoв xвaтuт нa obsession'4.1?

custom 5364091407386561558446

20 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC≈10,800 views865 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Cnacuбo бpocкu нageюсь Tы yвuдuшь

custom 5364091407386561558865

19 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈11,200 views256 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026

Ceroдня dj-set в rocтяx y Smesharique

custom 5364091407386561558256

19 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈11,200 views352 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5364091407386561558352

19 Sept 2026, 12:18 UTC≈11,200 views417 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026

Bcë xвaтuт. Bыбepy 3-4 кaнaлa

custom 5364091407386561558417

19 Sept 2026, 12:08 UTC≈11,300 views414 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026

C ccылкamu cpaзy

custom 5364091407386561558414

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @ovsyankintour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ovsyankintour edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTCAnonymous Poll3,630 voters approx.

Дa?!

  1. пoлья53%
  2. лeзвuе ceyл48%
  3. clonnex31%

The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTCAnonymous Poll4,300 voters approx.

KAKOŨ TPEK ПOПAДЕТ НА OBSESSION'4?

  1. Курикулы29%
  2. Взгляд глазуньи22%
  3. Ка_детская31%
  4. На сладкоежке28%
  5. Мама звОнит45%
  6. 110+19126%
  7. Я же правильно понял36%
  8. Запеканка с баблгам28%
  9. FLO25%
  10. Мор лобстеров (массовый)30%

The shares total 300%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

ISPREADAIDS
@ispreadaids · 1,050
4 posts
katafalk
@katafalkprod · 107
4 posts
гаснет / дида
@prodd1da · 24
4 posts
вбео ганг вбео ганг вбео ганг вбео ганг
@vbeogang · 591
4 posts
0rom/radiostation
@masterdozeradiostation · 84
2 posts
SUTER / Diva Nenormativa
@olegimirthesexmachine · 132
2 posts
СЛАВА КПСС / АНТИХАЙП
@PyatkaKripa · 1
1 post
Ташкент Музюк | Осёл Records
@TashkentMuzyuk · 549
1 post
Зверята и Трап
@alonealo1 · 708
1 post
ANDRUSHAPYRO
@andrushapyro · 195
1 post
СЛАВА КПСС \ АНТИХАЙП
@antihype_kpss · 173,967
1 post
Антихайп Без СД
@antihypebezsd · 1,409
1 post
антон мп3
@antonmp4 · 1,032
1 post
МОРГУНОВ LIVE
@art_morgunov · 1,330
1 post
чичако
@cheechako · 8,580
1 post
контуженный
@cuntuzia · 39
1 post
dj trippie flameboy
@djtrippieflameboy · 33,082
1 post
дмитрий колыбелкин против ютуба
@dkvscinema · 11,562
1 post
Голландский Штурвал
@dutchrudder_band · 554
1 post
Имбирь
@footfetishistclub · 88
1 post
PunkShit👾
@godnotatomorrow · 376
1 post
джиквин?
@gqueennn · 40
1 post
ГРЕЧКА
@grechkaluFOREVER · 14,389
1 post
новаяискренность
@gyperpostmodern · 24
1 post
WSGMONEY #gcn
@margielaa · 161
1 post
5mewmet
@mewmet5 · 60,411
1 post
дно дна
@notpops · 53
1 post
Рест 𝑷𝒊𝒔𝒚𝒂𝒄𝒉 aka Пысяч
@pisyah4 · 222
1 post
собор сонч <33
@prxttyktgc · 60
1 post
Маргиналии
@setonigram · 53
1 post
сося
@sosyaaa · 98
1 post
s****ring.
@sufferingsufferingsuffering · 62
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Овсянкин” (@ovsyankintour), 45,408 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ovsyankintour.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.