Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оксана Беркана | Записки оккультистки

Channel

Оксана Беркана | Записки оккультистки

@oxana_berkana

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,663subscribers

+245 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001469807790
TypeChannel
Username@oxana_berkana
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oxana_berkana

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3972,6632,53019 August 2026 — 2,418 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,414 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,404 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,399 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,397 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,659 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,640 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,639 subscribers26 September 2026 — 2,663 subscribers19 August 202626 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 38 days, net +245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,357–2,703 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 14:372,663+24
17 Sept 2026, 12:552,639-1
13 Sept 2026, 04:412,640-19
9 Sept 2026, 09:552,659+262
4 Sept 2026, 03:552,397-2
31 Aug 2026, 19:282,399-5
23 Aug 2026, 04:132,404-10
20 Aug 2026, 00:052,414-4
19 Aug 2026, 03:302,418first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

832 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519719602630533696839247.1%
custom 535306084044872753419223.1%
custom 52423674729626571648610.3%
custom 5240049337379087344647.69%
custom 5352732357054963148425.05%
custom 5197571694209817065253.00%
custom 5235938319237392375202.40%
custom 5242568245503875320111.32%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 832 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oxana_berkana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC166 views8 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Кстати, один из продюсеров My Heart Will Go On, главной песни «Титаника», — Уолтер Афанасьефф. Он же Владимир Никитич Афанасьев, американский композитор и продюсер из семьи русских эмигрантов. За эту запись он получил «Грэмми». Работал с Мэрайей Кэри, Уитни Хьюстон, Барброй Стрейзанд, Майклом Болтоном. А позже занялся Юлией Началовой: спродюсировал её англоязычный альбом Wild Butterfly и считал, что у неё есть все д…

custom 51971960263053369688

18 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC193 views21 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Смотрю документальный фильм «Я — Селин Дион». В одном из эпизодов она плачет и голосом показывает, как синдром мышечной скованности влияет на её голосовой аппарат, как меняется сама фонация. А следом включают архивную запись, где она поёт My Heart Will Go On. И вот тут меня просто разъебало. Потерять голос для вокалиста безумно больно. Даже обычному человеку, который поёт только для себя, тяжело лишиться этой возм…

custom 519719602630533696820custom 53527323570549631481

18 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC298 views33 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Если Вселенная бесконечна, где-то в ней может существовать абсолютно точная копия каждого из нас. У одной вашей копии сегодня иначе легла прядь волос. Другая десять лет назад сделала иной выбор и теперь живёт совсем другой жизнью. Ещё одна прожила всё ровно так же, как вы, вплоть до нынешней секунды, и прямо сейчас читает этот пост. И таких копий может быть бесконечное количество. К этому выводу приводят некоторые…

custom 524236747296265716416custom 51971960263053369689custom 52425682455038753205custom 51975716942098170653

18 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC333 views20 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Ну а вот, собственно, и то самое видео об Императрице и Саде Венеры. Если вы его ещё не видели, очень рекомендую посмотреть. В своё время оно собрало огромное количество тёплых откликов и содержательных комментариев. А если уже видели, можно и пересмотреть: видео действительно получилось насыщенным и полезным. В скором времени я собираюсь записать его заново. С тех пор мне стало что добавить, уточнить и раскрыть гл…

custom 519719602630533696816custom 52423674729626571644

18 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC322 views17 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 519719602630533696815custom 51975716942098170652

18 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC361 views47 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Отдельная просьба к людям, которые пишут «координально», «вкратцы» и «вообщем». Ебать, выучите уже один раз: кардинально; вкратце; в общем. Три слова. Это ж вам не таблица неправильных глаголов и не китайская грамота. Три, бляць, слова. Я понимаю: можно ошибиться, опечататься, не знать какое-нибудь редкое слово. Но «вообщем» вы используете каждый день. Сколько ещё лет вам нужно, чтобы заметить, что такого слова в…

custom 535306084044872753434custom 519719602630533696810custom 52400493373790873443

18 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC355 views27 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Один мой комментарий под рилсом бьюти-блогера набрал больше 60 тысяч лайков. И теперь мне бесконечно приходят ответы, которые состоят либо из «ахахах», либо из 😂😂😂. Вот зачем? Лайкнул, поржал и иди дальше. Я уже поняла, что смешно. Там 60 тысяч лайков. Необязательно каждому лично присылать мне этот плачущий смайл. Тем более десять штук подряд. Уведомления просто заебали. Открываешь телефон, думаешь, тебе кто-то чт…

custom 535306084044872753421custom 51971960263053369684custom 52400493373790873442

18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC387 views28 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Секундочка хейта. Что меня бесит в бьюти-блогерах. «А теперь накрасим нашу бровь». «Нанесём тушь на наш глаз». «Разделим наши волосы на пряди». Почему, блядь, наши? Ваши! Мы что, всем интернетом владеем этой бровью на правах долевой собственности? И глаз у нас один на всех? Коллективный? Это псевдововлекающее «мы» звучит так, будто с нами разговаривает воспитательница: «А теперь моем наши ручки, надеваем наши шт…

custom 535306084044872753422custom 51975716942098170653custom 52400493373790873443

15 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC541 views59 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 519719602630533696835custom 524236747296265716412custom 52425682455038753206custom 53527323570549631485custom 52400493373790873441

11 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC939 views27 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Я про «Пусть всегда будет Солнце» вообще молчу…

custom 524004933737908734422custom 52359383192373923755

11 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC958 views86 reactions6 Starsread 19 August 2026

Стоит мне немного почитать астрофизику, преисполниться масштабами Вселенной и возможным существованием мультивселенной, как интернет тут же показывает мне тред женщины, которая решила исправить форму коленей. Жить нам в масштабах Вселенной один пшик. И часть этого пшика женщинам предлагается потратить на то, чтобы ненавидеть собственные колени. Колени, господи. Мы уже разобрались с носами, овалами лица, нависшими …

custom 519719602630533696848custom 519757169420981706517custom 535306084044872753413custom 52400493373790873444custom 52423674729626571644

5 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,070 views38 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Чтобы вы понимали, уже несколько лет один из любимых ароматов у меня — Tom Ford Black Orchid. Вот такое мы любим, уважаем. Еще один любимчик — Tiziana Terenzi Il Piacere. Для меня это запах очень дорогой Италии. Роскошной. Женственный, томный, вечерний. Black Orchid — аромат с характером. Его далеко не все выдерживают. У меня реально были случаи, когда люди передумывали ехать со мной в одном лифте, если я была в нё…

custom 524004933737908734418custom 519719602630533696817custom 52359383192373923753

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oxana_berkana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Карты таро 🔮 с Анастасией Лыковой
@lykova_taro · 104,122
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Карты, Джен и 2 кота
@taro_jennifer · 78,397
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оксана Беркана | Записки оккультистки” (@oxana_berkana), 2,663 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oxana_berkana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.