Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for P03

Channel

P03

@p03dmggram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003932401390
TypeChannel
Username@p03dmggram
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/p03dmggram

Growth

1921209 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21 subscribers19 September 2026 — 20 subscribers9 August 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:1920-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:2421+2
11 Aug 2026, 16:3219no change
9 Aug 2026, 08:3019first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
101100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC42 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ долго меня не было >_ мне пришло нехило такое количество вопросов в анонимку >_ хд >_ отвечу позже >_ хотя кому я вру >_ 📺 >_ обычно когда я так говорю - я вообще не отвечаю >_ аннигилируюсь >_ 📺

8

20 May 2026, 13:05 UTC55 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ нет, я не отсталый >_ я знаю, что это мем >_ но он для отсталых

10

12 May 2026, 06:32 UTC61 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ спешу сообщить о том, что я закончил большинство назначенных (самим же собой) задач >_ возможно >_ я напишу сегодня что-то еще >_ но хз, вы как будто не достойны слышать о том, что я делаю в техническом плане ака целый день >_ слишком далеко и непонятное для вас состояние

8

9 May 2026, 13:30 UTC57 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ к слову, я не дам вам право слова >_ ну или по другому >_ комментарии >_ в прошлый раз вы меня выбесили своим отвратительным поведением >_ хотя скорее будет правильнее выразиться >_ 36₽&:!3 >_ 📺

7

9 May 2026, 13:25 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ аргументируй свой ответ

4

9 May 2026, 13:23 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

>_ возвращаюсь к работе >_ ибо такими темпами я сам себе голову оторву, если буду заниматься ерундой >_ хех >_ шучу >_ наверное.

5

9 May 2026, 13:22 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

[ РАБОТА ВОЗОБНОВЛЕНА . . . ] [ ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗКА . . . ]

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @p03dmggram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“P03” (@p03dmggram), 20 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p03dmggram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.