Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Padel Channel

Channel

Padel Channel

@padelchannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,998subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002294985595
TypeChannel
Username@padelchannel
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/padelchannel

Growth

7,9698,0958,0326 August 2026 — 8,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,069 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,095 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,054 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,001 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,986 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,969 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,976 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,005 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,998 subscribers7,9986 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,950–8,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 16:577,998-7
1 Sept 2026, 11:348,005+29
29 Aug 2026, 09:567,976+7
26 Aug 2026, 10:127,969-17
23 Aug 2026, 01:157,986-15
19 Aug 2026, 19:338,001-21
16 Aug 2026, 21:378,022-32
13 Aug 2026, 05:098,054-41
9 Aug 2026, 21:548,095+26
6 Aug 2026, 23:408,069+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,065no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:188,065first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.74%
avg views ÷ 7,998 subscribers
Avg views / post
699
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held153 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total55,940
Reactions total725
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 00s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,145 reactions across 136 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46740.8%
🔥28324.7%
❤‍🔥756.55%
😍544.72%
👍484.19%
🥰403.49%
🎉262.27%
👀242.10%
💯191.66%
👏181.57%
141.22%
👎131.14%
💔90.786%
😭90.786%
😢80.699%
😡60.524%
🤯60.524%
😁40.349%
😨30.262%
🤝30.262%
9 further kinds161.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC171 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🥶 Хоккейный падел или падел на льду? Суть вы поняли, а Red Bull и Premier Padel уже и корты поставили, и матчи провели! ⚡️ Рассказываем о неожиданно холодной игре, а также разрушительных последствиях ураганов в Таррагоне, альтер эго Хуана Леброна и рекордном благотворительном матче — в пятничном PC News. 📱 VK 📱 YouTube 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

1

28 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC299 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨ Вспоминаем чемпионов сезона-2026. Часть 1 🔜 На следующей неделе влетаем в насыщенную вторую половину года, но давайте посмотрим, кому уже удалось вписать себя в историю текущего сезона! А также: 🪙 Ари Санчес выиграла третий раз подряд турнир в Эр-Рияде. 🪙 Хуан Леброн и Лео Аугсбургер подняли первый трофей в Брюсселе. 🪙 Перламита доминировала в туре и не отдала никому серию из пяти турниров подряд. 🪙 До итальянск

2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC417 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😎 Обратная связь от Пакито В Лондоне Пакито Наварро/Мартин Ди Ненно встретились в четвертьфинале с Аймаром Гоньи/Эду Алонсо. Пакито и Мартин вышли победителями спустя три сета, но экс-первая ракетка мира остался впечатлённым игрой молодого паделиста 👏 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

2🔥2💯1

28 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC541 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔙 Ксюша покидает Белград Ксения Шарифова и Аликс Колломбон уступили второй паре турнира в четвертьфинале FIP GOLD BELGRADE. 🔜 Из россиянок на турнире осталась Дарья Кучерявая. Вместе с Барбарой Лас Эрас им предстоит побороться за выход в полуфинал с первыми сеяными Алехандрой Салазар и Аранзазу Осоро. 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

😢52🤣2

28 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC594 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🤩 Беа Гонсалес поделилась, какой она видит вторую часть года на корте. Учитывая прошлый неоднократный опыт с травмами, Беа осторожно подходит к этому вопросу. 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

❤‍🔥64

28 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC654 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🔥 Финалы XX MEDITERRANEAN GAMES собраны! 🪙 За титул чемпионов сразятся Альваро Монтьель/Флавио Аббате (Италия) против Хосе Дьестро/Давида Гала (Испания). 🪙 За титул чемпионок: Химена Веласко/Нурия Родригес (Испания) против Патрисии Ягуно/Лусии Сайнс (Испания). 🪙 В категории микст: Марко Кассетта/Джулия Даль Поццо (Италия) против Софии Араухо/Педро Араухо (Португалия). 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

5🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC695 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 Результаты на FIP GOLD BELGRADE 1/8 финала Шарифова/Колломбон (5) - Вано/Кастийон 6:3, 7:5 Борреро/Наварро (6) - Кутузова/Петрова 6:2, 6:2 Кучерявая/Лас Эрас (9) - Салимова/Каньейас 6:4, 6:4 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

3👏2

27 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC776 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

😏 Лето заканчивается и пора переходить на зимнее покрытие кортов. Red Bull и Premier Padel придумали новый вид спорта? 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

5😍4👎1

27 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC699 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Джон и Франко в Белграде! ✔️ Новая пара Джон Санс и Франко Ступачук приехали на FIP GOLD BELGRADE. Паделисты выступают под вторым сеяным номером, тогда как их бывшие напарники Майк Янгуас и Коки Ньето под первым. 😏 Пары уверенно прошли в 1/8 финала, но остаётся главный вопрос: сможем ли мы увидеть их в финале против друг друга? 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

3💯3😍3🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC718 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 Результаты на FIP GOLD BELGRADE 1/16 финала Шарифова/Колломбон (5) - Дарбур/Раду (Q) 6:1, 6:0 Кутузова/Петрова - Миросавлевич/Тодорович (WC) 6:1, 6:1 Салимова/Каньейас - Араус/Йованович 6:3, 6:2 Бускаино/Ди Баттиста - Бобрышева/Давыдова (LL) 6:2, 6:1 Кучерявая/Лас Эрас (9) - Милутинович/Инджин (LL) 6:0, 6:0 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

5👏2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC735 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✔️ Международные турниры с участием российских игроков! 🔝 Следим за результатами паделистов из России на турнирах FIP: 🪙 FIP SILVER WESTERBORK (Вестерборк, Нидерланды) — Ника Служителева, Варвара Попова. 🪙 FIP GOLD BELGRADE (Белград, Сербия) — более 10 российских паделистов. 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

4🔥3

26 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC755 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Легенда в Таранто! 😍 Экс-первая ракетка мира в парном разряде и экс-седьмая ракетка мира в одиночном Роберта Винчи посетила Средиземноморские игры и поддержала итальянскую сборную. 🎾Play for More by WINLINE

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @padelchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@padelchannel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Padel Channel” (@padelchannel), 7,998 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/padelchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.