马上十月了,很多朋友准备来重庆成都旅游,最近也有很多来咨询我商K的,那么我就结合最近自己的体验和兄弟们的反馈给大家做出还算不错的推荐 第一篇 成都 成都真空游戏场,主推荐还是 总府,商K归根到底还是颜值为王,总府算是我去过的成都游戏场里顶级颜值了,主要是都是年轻靓丽的演员,没有老,胖,丑,那种来凑人数的污染卡池。那里的妈咪也是比较年轻的,不机车,玩的开。畅饮的价格,总包人均单刷在3000-4000,如果两三个人来玩的话,人均差不多2200-2500。最近去过的兄弟,主要还是反馈演员漂亮,比较能提高情绪价值。 联系方式:kpd3838 成都颜值场的话,西城,蒙娜丽莎,都还不错,最近主推西城,主要是价格低,单刷3500,这种在以前是不敢想象的,如果兄弟们是比较吃颜值,不怎么在意有没有换装,游戏这些,西城确实非常不错。 联系方式:gdm200000 很多观众朋友问,帕吉哥,为什么总是推荐这几个店,原因很简单,去过的反馈都不错,我…

Channel
帕吉哥的商k分享频道
@pajiktv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,673subscribers
-260 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002139424350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pajiktv |
| Description | 全部为本人去过的商k的分享 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pajiktv |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:02 | 22,673 | -57 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 22,730 | -54 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 22,784 | -20 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 22,804 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 22,813 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 22,814 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 22,822 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 22,832 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 22,835 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 22,838 | +17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 22,821 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 22,827 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 22,834 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 22,833 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 22,841 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 22,848 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 22,852 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 22,858 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 22,857 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 22,859 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.1%
- avg views ÷ 22,673 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,870
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (14 July 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 65,855 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 49
- Videos
- 7
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3m 54s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
马上十月了,很多朋友准备来重庆成都旅游,最近也有很多来咨询我商K的,那么我就结合最近自己的体验和兄弟们的反馈给大家做出还算不错的推荐 第一篇 成都 成都真空游戏场,主推荐还是 总府,商K归根到底还是颜值为王,总府算是我去过的成都游戏场里顶级颜值了,主要是都是年轻靓丽的演员,没有老,胖,丑,那种来凑人数的污染卡池。那里的妈咪也是比较年轻的,不机车,玩的开。畅饮的价格,总包人均单刷在3000-4000,如果两三个人来玩的话,人均差不多2200-2500。最近去过的兄弟,主要还是反馈演员漂亮,比较能提高情绪价值。 联系方式:kpd3838 成都颜值场的话,西城,蒙娜丽莎,都还不错,最近主推西城,主要是价格低,单刷3500,这种在以前是不敢想象的,如果兄弟们是比较吃颜值,不怎么在意有没有换装,游戏这些,西城确实非常不错。 联系方式:gdm200000 重庆篇 也不啰嗦,直接给大家不会踩坑的推荐,这些场子都是很多兄弟们去过给过反馈的…
国庆节到了,全国各地🈶商k订房需求的,可以订之前问一下我。 如果有认证过的店起码不会猜坑 V:padma1233
跟大家说一下这是网上营销中介,用在重庆游戏场的小套路,重庆游戏场演员,基本上场子里的台费都是一个价不可能说有些人1300,有些人1600,基本上都是统一的1200到1300左右,多出来的部分就是那些中介自己赚了。比如跟你说一个演员1600,实际上1200,那么400就被营销自己揣兜了。 我自己绝对不可能赚这种钱,我的底线就是让帮大家尽量省钱,稍微赚一点酒水提成。这种给兄弟们涨价的事情做了就是烂屁眼
大家玩X的,可以关注一下我这个X号,平时也会在上面分享一些有趣的东西。
昨天去了重庆巴南这边的一个小ktv 单刷 总消费1000块钱,酒水400,老妹600。 为啥去这种大家可能觉得比较低端的场呢,因为一些刚入行的老妹,还没被社会气息污染,比较好玩,也年轻。大多数都是有一个闺蜜来上班了,就带了周围一群闺蜜来😂有机会遇到正儿八经比较不错的,而且失错成本低。单纯想找老妹喝个酒,不比去商务场花个三四千来的香?
马上十月了,很多朋友准备来重庆成都旅游,最近也有很多来咨询我商K的,那么我就结合最近自己的体验和兄弟们的反馈给大家做出还算不错的推荐 第一篇 成都 成都真空游戏场,主推荐还是 总府,商K归根到底还是颜值为王,总府算是我去过的成都游戏场里顶级颜值了,主要是都是年轻靓丽的演员,没有老,胖,丑,那种来凑人数的污染卡池。那里的妈咪也是比较年轻的,不机车,玩的开。畅饮的价格,总包人均单刷在3000-4000,如果两三个人来玩的话,人均差不多2200-2500。最近去过的兄弟,主要还是反馈演员漂亮,比较能提高情绪价值。 联系方式:kpd3838 成都颜值场的话,西城,蒙娜丽莎,都还不错,最近主推西城,主要是价格低,单刷3500,这种在以前是不敢想象的,如果兄弟们是比较吃颜值,不怎么在意有没有换装,游戏这些,西城确实非常不错。 联系方式:gdm200000 重庆篇 也不啰嗦,直接给大家不会踩坑的推荐,这些场子都是很多兄弟们去过给过反馈的…
为什么去商k前一定要跟商家确定好预算?对于我这种不太有钱的人,还是推荐大家畅饮场,消费固定。不会上头乱花钱开酒
https://youtu.be/QVJ73zI52PA?si=C9LOBF3AUnVq7pLB
马上十月了,很多朋友准备来重庆成都旅游,最近也有很多来咨询我商K的,那么我就结合最近自己的体验和兄弟们的反馈给大家做出还算不错的推荐 第一篇 成都 成都真空游戏场,主推荐还是 总府,商K归根到底还是颜值为王,总府算是我去过的成都游戏场里顶级颜值了,主要是都是年轻靓丽的演员,没有老,胖,丑,那种来凑人数的污染卡池。那里的妈咪也是比较年轻的,不机车,玩的开。畅饮的价格,总包人均单刷在3000-4000,如果两三个人来玩的话,人均差不多2200-2500。最近去过的兄弟,主要还是反馈演员漂亮,比较能提高情绪价值。 联系方式:kpd3838 成都颜值场的话,西城,蒙娜丽莎,都还不错,最近主推西城,主要是价格低,单刷3500,这种在以前是不敢想象的,如果兄弟们是比较吃颜值,不怎么在意有没有换装,游戏这些,西城确实非常不错。 联系方式:gdm200000 很多观众朋友问,帕吉哥,为什么总是推荐这几个店,原因很简单,去过的反馈都不错,我…
重庆篇 也不啰嗦,直接给大家不会踩坑的推荐,这些场子都是很多兄弟们去过给过反馈的店 真空游戏场:oc 或者时光城,oc 算是质量最高的游戏场,时光城是游戏多氛围好,最能体现特色的游戏场。两个场子消费基本差不多。看自己选择 订房联系方式V: 时光城:Whui970707 Oc:QiQiqiqi3214 颜值场:nova (主要消费不高,人均4500左右质量过关) 还有金源广场里面那几个店也都不错。反正要去,直接联系oc 那个经理77就行了
马上十月了,很多朋友准备来重庆成都旅游,最近也有很多来咨询我商K的,那么我就结合最近自己的体验和兄弟们的反馈给大家做出还算不错的推荐 第一篇 成都 成都真空游戏场,主推荐还是 总府,商K归根到底还是颜值为王,总府算是我去过的成都游戏场里顶级颜值了,主要是都是年轻靓丽的演员,没有老,胖,丑,那种来凑人数的污染卡池。那里的妈咪也是比较年轻的,不机车,玩的开。畅饮的价格,总包人均单刷在3000-4000,如果两三个人来玩的话,人均差不多2200-2500。最近去过的兄弟,主要还是反馈演员漂亮,比较能提高情绪价值。 成都颜值场的话,西城,蒙娜丽莎,都还不错,最近主推西城,主要是价格低,单刷3500,这种在以前是不敢想象的,如果兄弟们是比较吃颜值,不怎么在意有没有换装,游戏这些,西城确实非常不错。 很多观众朋友问,帕吉哥,为什么总是推荐这几个店,原因很简单,去过的反馈都不错,我只推荐我放心,保证大家体验,起码不踩坑的店。 感谢各位…
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @pajiktv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“帕吉哥的商k分享频道” (@pajiktv), 22,673 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pajiktv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.