Channel
@pal_Online9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,055subscribers
-118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001271903934 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pal_Online9 |
| Created | 11 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pal_Online9 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 8,055 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 8,059 | -14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 8,073 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 8,090 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 8,099 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 8,113 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 8,115 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 8,128 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 8,135 | -19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 8,154 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 8,159 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 8,174 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 8,173 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 8,173 | first reading |
240 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 240 (5 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,456 |
| Reactions total | 369 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 198 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,896 reactions across 237 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 585 | 30.9% | |
| ❤ | 497 | 26.2% | |
| 😢 | 452 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 211 | 11.1% | |
| 😱 | 107 | 5.64% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 2.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 237 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,896 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett recounts an incident in Croatia in which an ice cream vendor refused to serve his daughter after learning she was Israeli, throwing away the ice cream he had prepared for her.
👍12
📍Spotted in Athens, Greece
❤11
After walking from Eilat to Jerusalem, an Israeli reservist breaks down in tears outside the Knesset, demanding care for soldiers suffering from PTSD.
🔥4👎2
Israeli occupation forces expel a Palestinian family from their home and turn it into a military outpost during a raid on the area of Wadi Hamed, south of Nablus.
😢5👎4
A Palestinian woman leads chants for Gaza in Berlin, her voice rising to support the oppressed innocents in Palestine and Lebanon.
❤7
Footage documents Israeli quadcopter drones directly opening fire at children fetching water for their families in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza Strip.
😢6😱2
Israeli airstrikes target a tent in western Gaza City, killing at least one Palestinian and wounding others.
😢9
Israeli occupation authorities release Palestinian prisoner Hasan Arrar in a critical condition after 22 years of detention in Israeli prisons.
😢8
At least one Palestinian was killed and several others injured after the Israeli occupation targeted a bicycle in the Al-Sina'a area, central Gaza City.
😢9
Israeli settlers graze their livestock on Palestinian land in the village of Burqa, east of Ramallah.
😢4👎1
A new study by Palestinian-American author Susan Abulhawa finds that the Israeli occupation's arms exports are dramatically larger on a per-person basis than those of other major arms exporters. Using primarily SIPRI data, Abulhawa calculated that 'Israel' exported the equivalent of around $263 in arms per person in 2025, compared with $41 in the United States and $14 in Russia—roughly six times the U.S. figure and …
👎4
Israeli occupation bulldozers demolish agricultural structures in the area of Al-Ras al-Ahmar, northern Jordan Valley.
😢4😱2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @pal_Online9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Palestine Online 🇵🇸🇵🇸” (@pal_Online9), 8,055 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pal_Online9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.