Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PALANTIR

Channel

PALANTIR

@palantir_the_eye

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

82subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003996016376
TypeChannel
Username@palantir_the_eye
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/palantir_the_eye

Growth

469369.57 August 2026 — 46 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60 subscribers23 August 2026 — 93 subscribers30 August 2026 — 92 subscribers9 September 2026 — 87 subscribers16 September 2026 — 82 subscribers827 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 09:1982-5
9 Sept 2026, 11:1887-5
30 Aug 2026, 20:3492-1
23 Aug 2026, 10:1793+33
14 Aug 2026, 22:1460+14
10 Aug 2026, 14:1646no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:1746first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2532.5%
👍1620.8%
😁1013.0%
custom 535947220012447801467.79%
👎67.79%
🔥56.49%
🤔33.90%
😨22.60%
🫡22.60%
custom 525366830930751348311.30%
😡11.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC44 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Обзор на Duga RP Дуга – довольно старый проект, который прошел через доксы, перевороты и расколы, но даже после всего этого проект остается живым и активным 🗞 История проекта Проект зародился 12 августа 2024 года после переворота Бутыли Спирта в бывшем чате. Сразу же после создания проект вступил в войну с Валарионом, которая закончилась из-за захвата последнего доксерами. За два года Дуга пережила многое, включая…

❤4👍4👎2🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC62 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Обзор на Dread Chase Dread Chase – свежая настольная асимметричная хоррор-игра, запущенная на остатках закрывшейся Heroica. Создатель проекта, Некед, отдал приоритет созданию небольшого лампового проекта с адекватным комьюнити 🥏 Краткая история и суть игры Проект очень молодой, ведь его запуск состоялся 26 июля, а уже 4 августа вышло первое крупное обновление с новой картой, скинами, выжившим и убийцей Суть игры в…

👍8😁3❤2👎1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC61 viewsread 10 August 2026

ВСЕ ОБЗОРЫ ОТ М² 1. РП по Фандомам 2. Rise of World 3. Samaria 4. Heroica 5. Iron World 6. DREAD CHASE 7. Duga RP

6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

На кого делать обзор?

  1. Приятельская община32%
  2. DREAD CHASE68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤4

6 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC111 viewsread 10 August 2026

Проекты, которые хотят обзор, пишите сюда t.me/palantir_the_eye?direct

4 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC103 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Итоги вчерашнего поста 😃 Утимидж Он не появлялся ни в чате Нивы, ни в чате Феникза (в других местах не искал). Не знаю, проигнорировал он или правда не видел (второй вариант всё-таки возможен, ведь недавно у него траблы случились) 😀 Кудар Вчерашний пост всё же дал результат. Сначала утверждал, что якобы уже выдал мне приз. Потом попросил лог победителей (в общем, на скринах всё видно). С того момента прошёл поч…

❤2👍2🤔2😡1

4 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Теоретически возможные планы и цели по развитию Палантира Попробую написать свои цели и планы, чтобы их могли увидеть все. Может, это заставит меня придерживаться их больше, чем когда они известны только мне (хотя я в этом очень сомневаюсь) ✉️ Канал Выкладывать 3–4 поста в неделю. Но при этом не концентрироваться на чём-то одном, как это было с околообзорной тематикой (но и с обзорами я не прощаюсь). Буду постить …

❤2👍2🔥2🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC91 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Интересная ситуация получается. Я бы не писал этот пост-нытье, если бы Кудар хоть что-то мне отвечал, но нет. Игнор полный. А самое интересное это то, как себя ведёт сам Утимидж. Говорит, что Кудар его якобы игнорирует, как и меня, хотя Кудар заходит в чат Феникза и пописывает иногда (а я очень хочу верить, что Кудар не заходит в ЛС с Утимиджем, но заходит в Феникз) P.S. Я рукожоп, поэтому на скринах из чата Феникз…

❤6👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @palantir_the_eye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTCFinal Results44 voters

На кого делать обзор?

  1. Приятельская община32%
  2. DREAD CHASE68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTCFinal Results18 voters

Посты писать?

  1. Да78%
  2. Не22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PALANTIR” (@palantir_the_eye), 82 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/palantir_the_eye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.