Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,611–2,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 06:58
2,879
+119
15 Sept 2026, 07:15
2,760
+113
11 Sept 2026, 19:22
2,647
+1
7 Sept 2026, 03:17
2,646
-6
2 Sept 2026, 03:33
2,652
+4
29 Aug 2026, 16:47
2,648
-1
26 Aug 2026, 09:05
2,649
-8
23 Aug 2026, 06:05
2,657
-4
19 Aug 2026, 09:48
2,661
-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:22
2,663
-3
10 Aug 2026, 08:21
2,666
-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:28
2,669
-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:17
2,670
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
105 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
54
51.4%
❤
32
30.5%
👏
7
6.67%
👍
6
5.71%
🤯
5
4.76%
🥰
1
0.952%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @paleoevol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
1. Магниторецепция: Наличие кристаллов магнетита в клюве и рецепторов в глазах (связанных с белками-криптохромами), которые позволяют буквально видеть магнитное поле Земли.
2. Олфакторная карта: Способность ориентироваться по запахам.
3. Инфразвук: Голуби слышат сверхнизкие частоты (менее 10 Гц), что позво ляет им чувствовать приближение штормов за тысячи километров.
5. Доместикация и антропогенная эволюция
Совре…
Эволюция голубеобразных
Голуби (семейство Columbidae) — это одна из самых успешных и биологически продвинутых групп современных птиц. Несмотря на их обыденный имидж в городской среде, с точки зрения эволюционной биологии они представляют собой уникальный пример выживания и адаптации.
Их история начинается в тени динозавров и ведет к созданию сложнейших механизмов навигации и уникальных способов вскармливания потомс…
Как камни могут рассказать историю Земли
25 июля встречаемся на новой бесплатной лекции в рамках ДНК Онлайн. Поговорим, как минералы хранят память о рождении планеты, окаменелости помогают узнать о климате древних эпох, а по обычному булыжнику можно прочитать историю природных катастроф. Также обсудим, что такое каменная культура и где черпают знания те, кто увлекается минералогией.
📢 Лектор — Василий Фурт, камневе…
4. Вторичная минерализация и псевдоморфозы Иногда «перламутровый» эффект сохраняется даже при частичном разрушении исходного арагонита благодаря процессам псевдоморфозы (замещения одного минерала другим с сохранением исходной микроструктуры):
1. Пиритизация: В условиях восстановительной среды при участии сульфатредуцирующих бактерий органический матрикс раковины замещается пиритом (FeS_2). Если пирит тонкослойно нас…
• Насыщенность поровых растворов: Вода, заполняющая поры осадка, должна быть быстро насыщена ионами кальция (Ca^2+) и карбонат-ионами (CO_3^2-). Если раствор насыщен карбонатами, растворения арагонитовой раковины не происходит.
• Присутствие ионов-ингибиторов: Наличие в поровых растворах ионов магния (Mg^2+) и железа (Fe^2+) химически препятствует фазовому переходу «арагонит ⟶ кальцит», стабилизируя орторомбическую …
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
Геохимия, биоминерализация и диагенез: процесс сохранения перламутрового слоя при фоссилизации
Перламутровая фоссилизация (в геммологии и палеонтологии часто ассоциируемая с формированием биогенного драгоценного камня аммолита) — это редкий тафономический процесс, при котором в ископаемом состоянии сохраняется исходная арагонитовая микроструктура раковин древних моллюсков (преимущественно…
4. Размеры хищника
Экстраполяция размеров по сохранившимся элементам челюсти показывает, что Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis не уступал в размерах средним и крупным особям T. rex.
Его длину оценивают примерно в 12 метров, а массу — около 8–10 тонн. Это делает его сопоставимым с такими знаменитыми экземплярами T. rex, как «Сью» или «Скотти». Таким образом, сверхкрупные хищники появились на территории Северной Америки гораз…
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis
Более 110 лет род Tyrannosaurus оставался монотипическим — то есть состоящим из одного-единственного вида, знаменитого Tyrannosaurus rex. Все попытки выделить новые виды (такие как дискуссионные T. imperator или T. regina, предложенные в 2022 году) неизменно натыкались на жесткий скептицизм палеонтологического сообщества и синонимизировались обратно с T. rex.
Однако ситуац…
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
🗿🗿 🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
Беклеспинакс (Becklespinax altispinax) — таксон крупных двуногих хищных динозавров (Theropoda, Tetanurae), обитавших в раннем меловом периоде (валанжинский ярус, около 140–135 млн лет назад) на территории современной Европы. Находка этого динозавра послужила катализатором многолетних дискуссий в области палеонтологической систематики и сравнительной анатомии, касающихся эволюционного …
❤8👏2🔥2🤯1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @paleoevol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Глубина @thedeepsee · 41,933 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Палеонтология 🦕” (@paleoevol), 2,879 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paleoevol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.