Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Запахи травки в неожиданных местах

Channel

Запахи травки в неожиданных местах

@palevanety

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,802subscribers

-2,466 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001939309999
TypeChannel
Username@palevanety
Created2 November 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/palevanety

Growth

27,80230,27629,0396 August 2026 — 30,268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,509 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,123 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,747 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,588 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,606 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,622 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,652 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,663 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,664 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,725 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,762 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,889 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,950 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,975 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,995 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,010 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,038 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,048 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,074 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,094 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,101 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,103 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,115 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,942 subscribers6 September 2026 — 28,604 subscribers9 September 2026 — 27,802 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -2,466. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,431–30,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:3927,802-802
6 Sept 2026, 03:0028,604-338
4 Sept 2026, 01:4028,942-173
2 Sept 2026, 18:4729,115+12
1 Sept 2026, 14:1229,103+2
31 Aug 2026, 16:2429,101+7
30 Aug 2026, 19:4829,094+20
29 Aug 2026, 19:2429,074+26
28 Aug 2026, 20:1729,048+10
27 Aug 2026, 21:2429,038+28
26 Aug 2026, 23:1329,010+15
26 Aug 2026, 02:4428,995+20
25 Aug 2026, 00:1728,975+25
23 Aug 2026, 11:2528,950+61
21 Aug 2026, 23:2628,889+127
20 Aug 2026, 15:1328,762+37
19 Aug 2026, 12:4728,725+61
18 Aug 2026, 09:1828,664+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:4428,663+11
15 Aug 2026, 19:1528,652first reading

Engagement

217 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 27,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,630
167 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
167
of 217 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held217 (3 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total773,107
Reactions total24,152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 41s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31,391 reactions across 217 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14,78447.1%
😁3,71611.8%
🥰1,4724.69%
🖕9162.92%
🔥8722.78%
👍8712.77%
💯7762.47%
😭7512.39%
🤣5371.71%
❤‍🔥4871.55%
😢4551.45%
🕊4521.44%
🙏2790.889%
💘2760.879%
🤪2430.774%
🆒2420.771%
💩2320.739%
🤝2240.714%
🌭2230.71%
😨2190.698%
46 further kinds3,36410.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 217 of the 217 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,391 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 217 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 217 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @palevanety. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 217 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 12:09 UTC267 views9 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5🌚3🕊1

4 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,870 views92 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Бля

70🙏11💋8❤‍🔥1🏆1🖕1

4 Sept 2026, 03:28 UTC≈2,600 views99 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Оторвись от телефона

84🖕8👍7

4 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC≈2,850 views93 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🎃64💘1312💯3🖕1

3 Sept 2026, 18:14 UTC≈3,240 views107 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

85💋12🎉6🎃2🖕2

3 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC≈3,110 views56 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

В последнее время мой любимый канал с нотками милого нарочитого дебилизма бля хуй знает как объяснить так чисто чтобы немножко хихикнуть и рагрузиться умиротворение какое поймать ссылка на канал

💩3414😁5💘1💯1🥰1

3 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC≈3,460 views180 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Ахахах

113😁49💘5🌭3💋3😭3❤‍🔥2👍1

3 Sept 2026, 11:36 UTC≈3,390 views98 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

72💯98😭3🕊2🖕2❤‍🔥1💘1

3 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC≈3,100 views122 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @sendme_somelovePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏85😁1893🤡3🌚1🕊1🖕1

3 Sept 2026, 07:57 UTC≈3,570 views74 reactionsread 4 September 2026

Обожаю тебя честно честор читос и не сунусь если писька не со вкусом сырным

🆒5410🖕5🕊4🥰1

3 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC≈4,060 views154 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Пов твой телефон спизданул зек

113🥰28🖕6🕊4😁3

3 Sept 2026, 00:24 UTC≈4,160 views152 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Взгляд у этого петушка проницательный. Пробирает до мурашек.

😨100💯20🙏149👀3🖕3👍2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 217 posts we hold for @palevanety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,240 voters approx.

на какое направление поступишь?

  1. машинист - закладчик27%
  2. магистратура онлифанс38%
  3. обнал пушкинских карт39%
  4. аспирантура питупи арбитраж22%
  5. оператор пвз озон24%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 217 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

asptln
@ans1nthesour · 16
2 posts
[курсэд & блэссэд]
@cursed_blessed · 12,503
2 posts
D¥Rk@ Hecate
@durkahecate · 47
2 posts
чертик из табакерки
@getz_shitpost · 27
2 posts
manarek
@manarek · 14,937
2 posts
мегамемесы
@megamemeses · 114
2 posts
White Carnage
@whitecarnagecvlt · 245
2 posts
iseedeadpeople
@aightbroimgonnaslowdown · 14,538
1 post
aиalcontent
@aualcontent · 14,447
1 post
Кот ЖеняАтакует!
@detcat63 · 8
1 post
ДНК
@dnahealth · 954
1 post
Сны длиною в жизнь 🌙
@dreamsqp · 88
1 post
На учёте по 116 УкРф
@dysfunctional_lagner · 85
1 post
funny.mp4
@funny_mp4 · 25,463
1 post
Гифы мицелия
@gifusmicelium · 348
1 post
Алхимический щитпостинг в эмбриональной стадии развития
@golovinfond · 13,271
1 post
трэш, кринж и ситуэйшншип
@gvstk · 19,246
1 post
Сочные Риби 18+
@koiover18 · 13
1 post
$omadream$ (archive levnapal)
@levnapal · 31
1 post
Вконтакте.ру
@lol228kekk · 128
1 post
mem moment
@memmomentss · 24,663
1 post
смерть от мячика
@miachiknesetsmert · 45
1 post
Lurk Moar
@moarlurk · 38,175
1 post
принглс с папой
@mozhno_cheeseburger · 189
1 post
Night Bat Group "NBG"
@NightBatGroup · 117
1 post
Love sosa
@plunyd · 1
1 post
bbq sauce on my titties
@robby_morrison · 68
1 post
sepa
@sepa14 · 17,083
1 post
Вас трахает Патрик Бейтман
@sex_with_bateman · 14,663
1 post
Собачья жизнь
@simenematsimenem · 58
1 post
СПИННЕР ФАКТОВ
@spinnerfactov · 81
1 post
щас бы нaркoтеков и посмеяца
@whynenarkoteki · 29,977
1 post
XX8
@xxooxxoov · 166
1 post
200летХАЙПА
@zweihundertjahre · 604
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

щас бы нaркoтеков и посмеяца
@whynenarkoteki · 29,977
#1
fakeboys/1 ✨
@fakeboys01 · 41,706
#2
Поднебесный
@underskystar · 24,413
#3
Живой мир политики
@politika_true · 275
#4
Двач
@dvachannel · 937,263
#5
sepa
@sepa14 · 17,083
#6
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 629,020
#7
НЕОСПАС
@HOBO3ABETHOE · 1,711
#8
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,211
#9
СЛАВА КПСС \ АНТИХАЙП
@antihype_kpss · 174,119
#10
Абу
@abuwtf · 194,446
#11
декаданс и необля
@neoblya · 3,043
#12
internal observer
@pamphage · 15,540
#13
Это пиздец, бизнес🥀
@yanechmo812 · 418
#14
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 203,514
#15
Проблемы современных влюбленных
@sendme_somelove · 17,463
#16
зверюшек хозяин
@manymanyanimals · 5,790
#17
кьют-монархизм
@hyperpopmonarchism · 23,494
#18
Kenoma
@kenoma30 · 17,300
#19
Секс и Эзотерика 🕉
@sex_esoteric · 4,860
#20
Абстрактные мемы для браузерных экономистов и стратегов всех сортов кажется
@realpotatonuts · 13,576
#21
Goth memes
@morrisseysosat · 9,087
#22
Погранично-шизоидные отношения|ПШО
@prlshrlinlove · 35,242
#23
escape from eden " ボイド☨ 🗡️
@eden618 · 10,854
#24
social-eco club
@ecosocialclub · 5,991
#25

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

щас бы нaркoтеков и посмеяца
@whynenarkoteki · 29,977
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 7 September 2026
fakeboys/1 ✨
@fakeboys01 · 41,706
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 29 August 2026
Погранично-шизоидные отношения|ПШО
@prlshrlinlove · 35,242
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 2 September 2026
на Youtube уже больше 17ти лет!
@meme17k · 67,344
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Запахи травки в неожиданных местах” (@palevanety), 27,802 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/palevanety.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.