Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,505. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,505–77,462 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:17
75,731
-36
16 Sept 2026, 12:20
75,767
-15
14 Sept 2026, 18:00
75,782
-57
13 Sept 2026, 07:15
75,839
-89
11 Sept 2026, 12:55
75,928
-128
8 Sept 2026, 22:41
76,056
-161
5 Sept 2026, 13:42
76,217
-32
3 Sept 2026, 17:57
76,249
-61
2 Sept 2026, 06:43
76,310
-44
1 Sept 2026, 08:26
76,354
-44
31 Aug 2026, 06:16
76,398
-43
30 Aug 2026, 04:24
76,441
-17
29 Aug 2026, 07:09
76,458
-17
28 Aug 2026, 09:08
76,475
+1
27 Aug 2026, 06:03
76,474
-39
26 Aug 2026, 04:49
76,513
-31
25 Aug 2026, 03:06
76,544
-50
23 Aug 2026, 19:06
76,594
-52
22 Aug 2026, 05:45
76,646
-28
20 Aug 2026, 20:07
76,674
first reading
Engagement
63 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.90%
avg views ÷ 75,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,950
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 63 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
63 (10 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
100,395
Reactions total
1,606
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 15:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
358
Videos
171
Links
150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2h 27m
Average length
8m 42s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,087 reactions across 59 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,231
72.3%
🔥
315
10.2%
👍
230
7.45%
🙏
190
6.15%
💯
69
2.24%
❤🔥
12
0.389%
👏
11
0.356%
🕊
5
0.162%
🥰
5
0.162%
🐳
4
0.13%
👎
3
0.097%
💔
3
0.097%
⚡
2
0.065%
😇
2
0.065%
😢
2
0.065%
🤔
2
0.065%
🤗
1
0.032%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,087 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 59 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pamonashvili. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как заинтересовать ребенка занятиями?
Мы с радостью делаем только то, в чем видим смысл 🏒🥧🧶.
И бессознательно сопротивляемся всему, что кажется нам бессмысленным.
Ребенок устроен так же.
Подумайте: в чем ваш ребенок может найти смысл?
Что зажигает искру именно в его глазах? Попробуйте через игру, совместный проект или увлекательное дело связать его личные интересы с познанием мира. Для подростков игра часто принима…
🎁 Подарок для родителей
Ребенок меняется каждый день. И вместе с ним меняются наши вопросы. ⤵️
Почему малыш вдруг начал протестовать?
Откуда взялось это «Я сам»?
Зачем ребенку играть?
Что происходит с ребенком накануне 1 класса?
Мы собрали две PDF-инструкции, которые помогут лучше понимать особенности развития ребенка от рождения до 7 лет.
📘 «Первые три года»
О младенчестве, первых месяцах жизни, кризисе одного г…
Паата Амонашвили. Сила без насилия
В студенчестве я думал, что Иисус Христос своими заповедями дает мистический идеал, недостижимый для обычных людей.
Но со временем стал задумываться: зачем Богочеловек показал нам место, куда мы не можем дойти?
В Нагорной проповеди есть заветные слова: «Вам сказано: око за око и зуб за зуб. А Я говорю вам: не противься злому».
Махатме Ганди приписывают известные слова: «Око за о…
🗓 СЕНТЯБРЬ
Живые встречи с Паатой Амонашвили
«РЕБЕНОК В СОВРЕМЕННОМ МИРЕ»
Как стать опорой и вести к успеху
18–20 сентября — Новосибирск ✔️ Запись по тел.: +7 913 798-34-74 (Галина)
21 сентября — Казань ✔️ Записаться
22 сентября — Набережные Челны ✔️ Записаться
23 сентября — Самара ✔️ Записаться
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🗓 ОКТЯБРЬ
Живые встречи с Шалвой Амонашвили
«СУДЬБА И ЛЮДИ»
4 октября — Екатеринбург ✔️ Записаться
…
Притча про двух монахов
Утром идут два монаха — старший и младший. Они возвращаются в монастырь после сильного дождя. Перед ними разлилась река и превратилась в грязное месиво.
На берегу стоит девушка в красивом шелковом платье. Ей нужно перебраться на другую сторону, но она боится испачкаться.
Старший монах, не говоря ни слова, подходит к девушке, берет ее на руки, переносит через грязь и ставит на сухой берег. Д…
Кто хозяин вашего внутреннего дома?
Представьте: что будет в доме, если хозяин давно не наводил порядок? Везде мусор и пыль, грязные окна, немытые полы. Негде сесть.
Если спросить хозяина: «Почему здесь так?» — а он ответит: «При чем тут я? Сюда приходят разные люди, оставляют свой мусор, портят мне жизнь». 😂
Кто тогда отвечает за порядок — те, кто приходит, или хозяин дома?
Нам не нравится беспорядок.
Когда я и…
🗓 24–31 октября | Mzianeti International — в Турции
Друзья, приглашаем вас провести эти осенние каникулы вместе с нами — в Турции!
Мы летим всей семьей: Паата, Тамрико и, конечно, Шалва. Да-да, Шалва тоже едет с нами! 😄
И на семь дней мы отправляемся в удивительное место — Фетхие. Лазурное море, горы, сосновые леса и Ликийская тропа — место, созданное для приключений. 🔥
В легендарном Liberty Lykia впервые в Турци…
☕️ Утренняя настройка от 13.09.2026 г.
🤗 Если вам понравилось в «Клубе осознанных родителей» и вы хотите остаться с нами, сейчас можно оформить подписку со скидкой на 30, 90, 180 или 365 дней: https://lk.amonashvili.club/klub-podpiska
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @pamonashvili. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pamonashvili edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 September 2026
Most recent edit
11 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПААТА АМОНАШВИЛИ | Педагог, психолог, писатель” (@pamonashvili), 75,731 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pamonashvili.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.