Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Panfilov Planet

Channel

Panfilov Planet

@panfilovplanet

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,829subscribers

-886 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774320623
TypeChannel
Username@panfilovplanet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/panfilovplanet

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

19.2 average views per post against 8,829 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.218%. Across the 4,329 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,167–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.34% and 17.7%, with a median of 8.85%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured17 of 17 published in the window (17 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled327
Mature posts only0.253% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,829 measured 15 September 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 4,329 channels · p10 2.25% · p25 4.34% · p50 8.85% · p75 17.7% · p90 28.2%
Position in cohort0.947th percentile · 1/40 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.033% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,8299,7159,2727 August 2026 — 9,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,715 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,687 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,589 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,515 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,417 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,399 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,337 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,278 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,043 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,969 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,902 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,829 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -886. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,696–9,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:418,829-73
11 Sept 2026, 14:228,902-67
7 Sept 2026, 04:198,969-74
2 Sept 2026, 05:239,043-45
30 Aug 2026, 14:259,088-190
27 Aug 2026, 10:279,278-59
24 Aug 2026, 04:189,337-62
20 Aug 2026, 18:239,399-18
18 Aug 2026, 02:239,417-98
15 Aug 2026, 10:489,515-74
11 Aug 2026, 16:379,589-98
8 Aug 2026, 14:209,687-28
7 Aug 2026, 18:019,715no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:599,715first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.206%
avg views ÷ 8,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.2
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held67 (20 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total218
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

154 reactions across 62 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5837.7%
🔥3522.7%
2013.0%
🏆149.09%
💯127.79%
👏74.55%
❤‍🔥53.25%
😁21.30%
🐳10.649%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC10 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#В_ЭТОТ_ДЕНЬ #ТРИАТЛОН #ВУ_ФЫОНГ_ТХАНЬ 28 августа 2022 года в Швейцарии произошло событие, которое для вьетнамского спорта стало историческим. Ву Фыонг Тхань, известная в спортивной среде как Thanh Vu, первой среди спортсменов своей страны выиграла чемпионат мира по Deca Ultra Triathlon сверхдлинный триатлон Swiss Ultra. Она завершила дистанцию за 328 часов 27 минут 55 секунд, то есть за 13 дней 16 часов 27 минут

28 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC10 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#В_ЭТОТ_ДЕНЬ #ФУТБОЛ #СПОРТИВНЫЕ_ПРАЗДНИКИ 27 августа 1911 года принято считать днём рождения футбольного клуба ЦСКА. В этот день команда Общества любителей лыжного спорта — ОЛЛС провела свой первый официальный матч в первенстве Москвы и встретилась с клубом «Вега». Дебют завершился убедительной победой «лыжников» со счётом 6:2. По старому стилю дата матча приходилась на 14 августа, а по современному календарю — н

28 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC11 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#ЦИТАТЫ #ЛЕГКАЯ_АТЛЕТИКА #ДЖЕКИ_ДЖОЙНЕР_КЕРСИ

28 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC17 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @trirulesPhoto

🏁 Тут полз - и герой. А там полз - и был снят с соревнований. Спойлер: правила IRONMAN и World Triathlon написаны с одного черновика. Но там, где они расходятся, расходятся не в запятых, а в судьбах: за одно и то же действие в одном документе – желтая карточка, в другом - дисквалификация. Собрали для вас места, где можно потерять гонку, будучи уверенным, что всё делаешь правильно. 1. Ползти к финишу. IRONMAN, 6.01(

27 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#PANFILOV_PLANET #ТРИАТЛОН #БЕГ_В_ТРИАТЛОНЕ Первый старт в триатлоне или дуатлоне нередко оказывается непривычным и даже пугающим. Казалось бы, хорошо знакомый бег вдруг сопровождается необычными, а иногда и болезненными ощущениями. Для начинающих триатлетов именно беговой этап часто становится самым сложным испытанием. В новой статье «Бег в триатлоне: отличия от обычного бега и принципы подготовки» разберём, чем

1

27 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#ЦИТАТЫ #БОКС #ФЛОЙД_МЕЙВЕЗЕР

👍1

27 Aug 2026, 01:24 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#PANFILOV_PLANET #ТРИАТЛОН #ПИТАНИЕ_ТРИАТЛЕТА В питании триатлета есть два золотых правила, которые должны быть в голове всегда: есть нужно до того, как почувствуешь голод, и пить до того, как наступит жажда. Во время интенсивной физической нагрузки кровь направляется к мышцам, чтобы обеспечить их энергией. И это приводит к снижению кровоснабжения органов пищеварительной системы. Что ещё нужно знать о питании во в

👍1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#ЦИТАТЫ #АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ_ФУТБОЛ #МАЙК_ДИТКА

1🏆1

25 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#В_ЭТОТ_ДЕНЬ #ПЛАВАНИЕ #МЭТТЬЮ_УЭББ В августе 1875 года капитан торгового флота Великобритании Мэттью Уэбб совершил то, что до него считалось практически невозможным. В одиночку переплыл Ла-Манш из Англии во Францию без спасательного жилета, понтона или другого плавательного средства. Его заплыв продолжался 21 час 45 минут. С 12:56 24 августа до 10:41 утра 25 августа. Официальное расстояние между берегами составл

👍1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#ЦИТАТЫ #ХУДОЖЕСТВЕННАЯ_ГИМНАСТИКА #ИРИНА_ВИНЕР

👍2

24 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#В_ЭТОТ_ДЕНЬ #ТРИАТЛОН #МАРК_БАРР Марк Барр родился 24 августа 1986 года в Вудленде, штат Калифорния. Сегодня он известен как американский паратриатлет класса PTS2, но его спортивная история началась в плавании. В подростковом возрасте Барр потерял правую ногу из-за остеосаркомы — злокачественной опухоли костной ткани. Однако болезнь не поставила точку в его спортивной карьере. Восстановившись после лечения и амп

1🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @panfilovplanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@panfilovplanet edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Panfilov Planet” (@panfilovplanet), 8,829 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panfilovplanet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.