Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 84 days, net -594. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,612–19,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Oct 2026, 07:31
18,701
-5
28 Oct 2026, 04:47
18,706
-2
27 Oct 2026, 02:37
18,708
-7
26 Oct 2026, 03:51
18,715
-10
25 Oct 2026, 06:57
18,725
-3
24 Oct 2026, 03:36
18,728
-1
23 Oct 2026, 02:07
18,729
-6
22 Oct 2026, 02:30
18,735
-10
20 Oct 2026, 23:46
18,745
-2
19 Oct 2026, 19:20
18,747
-9
18 Oct 2026, 20:21
18,756
-10
17 Oct 2026, 23:05
18,766
-14
16 Oct 2026, 22:55
18,780
-2
16 Oct 2026, 01:08
18,782
-5
15 Oct 2026, 01:21
18,787
-9
13 Oct 2026, 18:11
18,796
-34
10 Oct 2026, 03:22
18,830
-28
5 Oct 2026, 21:38
18,858
-9
30 Sept 2026, 08:38
18,867
-37
18 Sept 2026, 01:59
18,904
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 14s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,534 reactions across 47 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,390
35.0%
❤🔥
1,877
15.0%
🔥
1,786
14.2%
👍
980
7.82%
😁
875
6.98%
😱
733
5.85%
😢
542
4.32%
🕊
365
2.91%
🙏
326
2.60%
🗿
149
1.19%
🐳
123
0.981%
🥰
102
0.814%
🤔
90
0.718%
🤬
54
0.431%
💯
46
0.367%
🦄
37
0.295%
👌
36
0.287%
😘
13
0.104%
🤩
10
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,534 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 47 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @parkwithluv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
я недавно узнал, что многие люди вообще никогда не ездили на троллейбусах. а я вот прикиньте всю школьную жизнь добирался до школы на троллейбусе и трамвае. в основном же везде автобусы или маршрутки. в корее я тоже не видел троллейбусы.
вот реально, из вас тоже большинство наверное не катались, да?
сижу в общем на рыбалке, вокруг корейцы и китайцы, полный пруд. в общем, сижу и у меня клюет один за одним. спустя примерно час ко мне подходят трое корейцев, в руках удочка и леска отрезана видно. и че то начинают мне говорить, я такой сначала "можно чуть помедленнее, я иностранец, вам леска нужна?" и даю им моток лески. он такой взял эту леску и стоит чето обсуждает со своими друганами. потом другой подходит и гов…
вот знаете, каждый наверное думал о том, чтобы написать книгу. ну по-любому, прикидывал хотя бы что прикольно же. но в основном, это все кажется чем-то нереальным, ибо нужно как минимум уметь писать без ошибок, а как максимум, у тебя должно быть очень много информации, которую нужно вместить структурировано, да и вообще нужно быть писателем же. и поэтому кажется что это только для писателей)
но в наше время, оказывае…
уже 2 года прошло, а до сих пор получаю отзывы о книге. приятно, что людям на самом деле понравилось. хотя я уже сколько раз говорил, что мог написать и лучше, но сроки поджимали, пришлось на скорую руку все делать.
главное что кому-то книга принесла пользу, значит все не зря)
если что, ребята, я уже почти нормально хожу, без костылей. с середины сентября возобновляю проводить экскурсии, фотосессии, держу в курсе.
g1 также занимаюсь, до сих пор всем одобряют :)
всем хорошего дня :)
в последнее время в корее обсуждается новость о том, что на острове чеджу похищают людей. а вчера там был арестован полицейский, который был соучастником 298 пропаж. он удалял из базы данных этих людей.
так что, ребята, кто летит в корею, аккуратнее на чеджу. это все ужасно конечно
помните я снимал ролик про жену корейца миллионера пару лет назад?
так вот, спустя год они разошлись, а теперь он выглядит так. оч быстро поменялся. это не фотошоп если че )
коротко о моем дне: я был на рыбалке и снимал с дрона, хотел показать вам природу красивую. в итоге все снял и когда возвращал дрон обратно, уже почти перед моим лицом, я нажал не ту кнопку и он ударился об стенку и УПАЛ В ВОДУ!
так и не нашел.
конец
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @parkwithluv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@parkwithluv edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“саня parkwithluv” (@parkwithluv), 18,701 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parkwithluv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.