Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Погребижская. Без сахара.

Channel

Погребижская. Без сахара.

@partizanets

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

437,897subscribers

+5,798 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195202552
TypeChannel
Username@partizanets
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/partizanets

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

432,099437,897434,9987 August 2026 — 432,099 subscribers7 August 2026 — 432,099 subscribers7 August 2026 — 432,186 subscribers8 August 2026 — 432,441 subscribers9 August 2026 — 432,668 subscribers10 August 2026 — 432,860 subscribers11 August 2026 — 433,072 subscribers12 August 2026 — 433,308 subscribers13 August 2026 — 433,485 subscribers14 August 2026 — 434,158 subscribers16 August 2026 — 434,410 subscribers17 August 2026 — 434,719 subscribers18 August 2026 — 434,799 subscribers19 August 2026 — 434,884 subscribers20 August 2026 — 435,019 subscribers21 August 2026 — 435,154 subscribers22 August 2026 — 435,349 subscribers24 August 2026 — 435,409 subscribers25 August 2026 — 435,433 subscribers26 August 2026 — 435,417 subscribers27 August 2026 — 435,384 subscribers28 August 2026 — 435,407 subscribers29 August 2026 — 435,370 subscribers30 August 2026 — 435,335 subscribers31 August 2026 — 435,348 subscribers1 September 2026 — 435,300 subscribers2 September 2026 — 435,202 subscribers3 September 2026 — 435,093 subscribers5 September 2026 — 435,528 subscribers8 September 2026 — 436,385 subscribers11 September 2026 — 436,495 subscribers13 September 2026 — 437,136 subscribers14 September 2026 — 437,388 subscribers16 September 2026 — 437,489 subscribers19 September 2026 — 437,897 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +5,798. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 431,229–438,767 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:35437,897+408
16 Sept 2026, 16:55437,489+101
14 Sept 2026, 17:39437,388+252
13 Sept 2026, 06:37437,136+641
11 Sept 2026, 12:20436,495+110
8 Sept 2026, 22:21436,385+857
5 Sept 2026, 13:16435,528+435
3 Sept 2026, 14:20435,093-109
2 Sept 2026, 05:05435,202-98
1 Sept 2026, 06:04435,300-48
31 Aug 2026, 09:14435,348+13
30 Aug 2026, 07:38435,335-35
29 Aug 2026, 10:33435,370-37
28 Aug 2026, 13:23435,407+23
27 Aug 2026, 13:53435,384-33
26 Aug 2026, 13:54435,417-16
25 Aug 2026, 13:22435,433+24
24 Aug 2026, 11:58435,409+60
22 Aug 2026, 18:15435,349+195
21 Aug 2026, 10:46435,154first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 437,897 subscribers
Avg views / post
67,900
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held45 (31 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total1,562,400
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 53s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,053
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 43 we hold a reading for · 49%
Most on one post
264
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @partizanets. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.44%
2 of 45 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
103,000
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
81,400
over 41 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxxZfs2s118 August 202618 August 2026
2W5zFJcuutu117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈10,900 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, родители школьников, готовы к завтрашнему дню? :) особенно интересует моральный аспект )

31 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈28,500 views0 reactions2 Starsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Сегодня последний день лета и наш первый рабочий понедельник! И у нас готово новое видео для спонсоров. Новая криминальная история уже в раннем доступе для тех, кто нас ежемесячно поддерживает! ИСТОРИЯ В РАННЕМ ДОСТУПЕ ВАЖНО 🖍🖍🖍 В общем доступе и бесплатно видео обязательно появится скоро на моём YouTube-канале. Если вы наш донатор, у вас есть ранний доступ уже вот по этим ссылкам: YouTube:

30 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈55,900 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Мама Саши Чугайнова на его YouTube-канале “Ворон TV” опубликовала запись, очень хочу ее продублировать тут: «Крик души!!! Люди, опомнитесь, что вы делаете, что вы пишете??? Хочу внести ясность в этом трагическом происшествии. 19 числа вечером Александр не выходил на связь, мы заволновались и стали искать его, не нашли. По факту пропажи 20 числа я обратилась в полицию с заявлением об исчезновении своего сына. Дале

30 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈55,200 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

В Подмосковье к шести годам колонии приговорили кардиохирурга, который убил 29-летнего пасынка во время ссоры. Об этом сообщает Telegram-канал Baza. Инцидент произошел в подмосковном Чехове в марте этого года. Между матерью и ее сыном разгорелась ссора. Женщина не хотела давать ему деньги на поездку в Петербург, поскольку молодой человек страдал игровой зависимостью и часто впадал в ярость. В этот раз он набросился

30 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈56,500 views0 reactions19 Starsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Всем отличного воскресного дня! Какие планы на сегодня? Мы вернулись домой и поглотились бытом :) Разбираем вещи, привыкаем.

29 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈63,100 views0 reactions25 Starsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Согласны? :) Какую надпись предложили бы вы?

29 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC≈67,300 views0 reactions131 Starsread 31 August 2026
Video

На видео присутствует нецензурная брань, берегите уши. 🚨 В соцсетях сейчас активно обсуждают кадры, снятые, судя по всему, на камеру домофона. В Татарстане местный житель стал свидетелем того, как подросток ударил девушку по лицу. При этом юноша не ограничился одним ударом: он таскал спутницу за волосы и, сопровождая действия грубой речью, гнал её к подъезду. Мужчина вмешался: он довольно жёстко проучил подростка.

29 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈66,800 viewsread 31 August 2026
Video

Привет, друзья! Всем отличных выходных! Начнем день с позитива :) Вот что написала Анастасия, мама мальчиков, под видео: «Дети находились в деревне, а я с ночной смены приехала к ним. Дальше ребята встретили меня у ворот и утащили на рыбалку. А так как я - «я же мать», отказать им не могла. Так и оказалась я спящей, уставшей, а парни - довольные и счастливые, что мы вместе ❤️». Автор: morozovaa08

28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈69,500 viewsread 31 August 2026
Video

Пока какая-то совсем непонятная история, ждем подробностей… Машинист поезда, следующего в Адлер, увидел на путях полуголого ребенка. Он успел экстренно остановить состав, вышел из кабины и перенёс мальчика в безопасное место. После этого вызвал скорую помощь и сотрудников транспортной полиции. По сообщению источника, знакомого с ситуацией, «состояние ребёнка в норме». Хотя инцидент произошел 25 августа, до сих по

28 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈69,600 viewsread 31 August 2026
Video

Смотря эти кадры, ловлю себя на мысли, что перестаю быть взрослым, адекватным, цивилизованным человеком. Что-то очень темное из глубин поднимается… В Ярославле в объектив камеры попало, как мать избила маленькую дочь-инвалида в подъезде дома. Об этом сообщает Telegram-канал «Жесть Ярославль». Предварительно, инцидент произошел ночью 25 августа в доме на улице Папанина. 45-летняя жительница Ярославля поздно ночью в

28 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈70,700 views0 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026
Photo

Привет, друзья! Отличного нам с вами дня! Прочитала, что в России установили выплаты за долгий брак. Газета.RU пишет, что мера поддержки действует в 26 регионах. В разных субъектах суммы и условия получения денег могут отличаться. «Самые большие выплаты — в Челябинской области. Там за 50, 60 и 70 лет совместной жизни полагается выплата в 50, 100 или 150 тыс. руб. для пар, проживших в регионе не менее 15 лет. В Мо

27 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈72,000 views0 reactions60 Starsread 31 August 2026
Video

Хорошего вечера, друзья! Видео: inga_shugurova

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @partizanets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.facebook.comregistrable domain: facebook.com1 post · 31 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post
youtu.be1 post · 31 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post
youtube.com1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Elena Pogrebizhskaya (en.wikipedia.org)
“…[https://artdoc.media/ru/author/19514/ Filmography] at ArtDoc.Media * https://t.me/partizanets The official telegram channel {{authority control}}…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Погребижская. Без сахара.” (@partizanets), 437,897 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/partizanets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.