Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
PARTNERSHIP THE VALIANT
@partnerthevaliant
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002431829494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @partnerthevaliant |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/partnerthevaliant |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 20 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 19 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 20 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Sticker, posted without a caption
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Sticker, posted without a caption
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Sticker, posted without a caption
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Sticker, posted without a caption
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Sticker, posted without a caption
@OFCTHEVALIANT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @partnerthevaliant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@OFCTHEVALIANT · 8,1388 posts[ OPEN 𝐏𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐄𝐍 ] [CLOSE HIRING] 𝐀𝐆𝐋𝐀𝐄𝐀 𝐌𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋
@AMHOFC · 11,0741 postBRÄSSLACH SQUAD
@BRASSLACHSQUAD · 18,8141 post〄 𝔅𝔯𝔬𝔫𝔵 ℭ𝔥𝔞𝔦𝔯𝔲𝔰 〄 [ OPEN MEMBER ]
@BronxChairusOfficial · 4,2791 postALPHA INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
@centerofintelligence · 2,9751 post𝙀𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙄𝘼 𝙋𝙀𝙍𝙁𝙊𝙈𝘼𝙉𝘾𝙀 𝘼𝘾𝘼𝘿𝙀𝙈𝙔
@EPAOFC · 5,0721 post𝗟𝗣𝗠 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗜 𝗙𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗘𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗘𝗥
@Harleyquline · 7,7831 post[OPEN BOOK]ㅤㅤPhase.ㅤIdolL'ize Entertainment
@IDOLLIZEOFC · 1,0411 post[BUBAR]
@MAPLEAFORPH · 2,4011 post[ OPEN BABY ] 𝑨𝑺𝑻𝑹𝑨 𝑵𝑶𝑰𝑹𝑬 𝑶𝑹𝑷𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑨𝑹𝑰𝑼𝑴
@NoireOrphanarium · 1,3961 post[BIG HIRING 2] 𝗔𝗖𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗔 𝗗𝗘 𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗠𝗢
@OFCADETURISMO · 1,5571 post𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗕𝗔𝗝𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗦
@ofcbajinas · 13,6891 post[HIATUS] 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐒
@OFCCHRONOS · 9,2121 postHIRING & OPMEM || 𝗗𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝗙𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘀𝘆 𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗱𝗼𝗺
@OFCDUFANKINGDOM · 8,9041 post℧ 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗞𝗔𝗨𝗕𝗢𝗜
@OFCKAUBOI · 5,3791 post𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗣𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗢𝗠 𝗥𝗘𝗚𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧
@OFCPHANTOMREGIMENT · 4,8791 post𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗚𝗥𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗗𝟭𝟳
@OFFICIALUDG17 · 3,0701 postℜ𝖮𝖫𝖤𝖯𝖫𝖠𝖄𝖤𝖱 𝔄𝖢𝖠𝖣𝖤𝖬𝖄
@RPCADEMY · 2,2091 postROMBAK. 𝗧𝗛Σ 𝗩Λ𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖
@TheVastic · 3,4901 post‘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗗𝗜𝗖𝗧’ ── 𖣇. 𝟭𝟵𝟮𝟬 ( 📰 ) ROMBAK
@VERDICT1920 · 3,7071 postHI, WE’RE VOSCADE!
@VOSCADE · 2,2731 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@partnerthevaliant named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PARTNERSHIP THE VALIANT” (@partnerthevaliant), 20 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/partnerthevaliant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.