Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PYC - Updates

Channel

PYC - Updates

@passyourchallengeexclusive

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,917subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001576280461
TypeChannel
Username@passyourchallengeexclusive
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/passyourchallengeexclusive

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1250 · this entry12 Jan 2026, 14:23 UTC@mycopytraderfree/66812 Jan 2026, 14:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1254 · this entry14 Jan 2026, 19:56 UTC@mycopytraderfree/67214 Jan 2026, 19:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1256 · this entry27 Jan 2026, 23:15 UTC@mycopytraderfree/67427 Jan 2026, 23:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1258 · this entry18 Feb 2026, 21:18 UTC@mycopytraderfree/67618 Feb 2026, 21:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1259 · this entry25 Feb 2026, 20:22 UTC@mycopytraderfree/67725 Feb 2026, 20:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@passyourchallengeexclusive/1260 · this entry12 Mar 2026, 18:09 UTC@mycopytraderfree/67812 Mar 2026, 18:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mycopytraderfree13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@mycopytraderfree (12–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 January 2026 to 27 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @mycopytraderfree. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,9171,9441,930.57 August 2026 — 1,944 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,942 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,941 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,939 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,938 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,937 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,935 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,931 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,926 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,923 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,922 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,919 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,917 subscribers7 August 20265 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 59 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,913–1,948 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 07:411,917-2
26 Sept 2026, 18:201,919-3
17 Sept 2026, 06:191,922-1
13 Sept 2026, 06:591,923-3
9 Sept 2026, 02:141,926-5
4 Sept 2026, 01:211,931-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:081,935-2
28 Aug 2026, 20:071,937-1
23 Aug 2026, 05:341,938-1
19 Aug 2026, 09:461,939-2
12 Aug 2026, 22:421,941-1
10 Aug 2026, 05:511,942-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:161,944no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:031,944first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC205 viewsread 7 August 2026

Miller here joined us just 2 months ago Since then he locked in and got himself 8 payouts ($9k) using Archangel X This is how he did it: https://youtu.be/9vUz2o38jlc?si=xzZN_Mh5xLKYgLRo

26 Apr 2026, 18:50 UTC582 viewsread 7 August 2026

How I made $700,000 trading with zero discipline 👇 https://youtu.be/K0xU8qVjQOY

1 Apr 2026, 20:58 UTC664 viewsread 7 August 2026

And we’re back with the lifestyle vlogs! I know you guys love these! The trading day to day with the lifestyle it gives you once you’ve mastered it I break down all the trades my algo took during the trip, and how much it made ! This is how Miami is done! Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q3aw6JKG0&feature=youtu.be

14 Mar 2026, 23:09 UTC646 viewsread 7 August 2026

Not much time left to take advantage of our massive 50% launch discount for our newest trading algorithm! FullPort Algo allows you to pass futures prop evaluations in 2-4 minutes And is currently the easiest way to get millions in funding from legit prop firms that PAY OUT! Can be used on Apex, Lucid and any firm that uses Tradovate or Ninjatrader! I’ve gotten over $2.5M in capital using this method myself before…

12 Mar 2026, 18:09 UTC599 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This is MASSIVE We just cracked the code on getting APEX evaluations passed in 2-3 mins MAX And you can pass 10+ at once, in one go! How? Using our newest FullPort Algo 🔥 And because this is launch, we’re doing a massive 50% discount to kick things off!!! (Also have a video where I got funded $2.5M with it if you want to see it in action 👀) Send me the word “APEX” to @archangelai

25 Feb 2026, 20:22 UTC640 viewsread 7 August 2026

One of our students walked away from his job and started hitting $30K weeks consistently, using the same algo that we post here everyday I told him we should do an in-depth interview to break down his process in front of my Mastermind students. He agreed, and this was the outcome: https://youtu.be/Mt6E7SmpK4E

18 Feb 2026, 21:18 UTC653 viewsread 7 August 2026

What happens when you let AI trade your money for a full month? $33,000 happened. I documented every single day. New video is live 👇 https://youtu.be/PndH0EajlOU

4 Feb 2026, 20:42 UTC707 viewsread 7 August 2026

I challenged myself to get as much funding as possible in the shortest amount of time. I chose Apex Trader funding as the target and I hit them for over $2,000,000 funded in only 4 days. The best part is I filmed the whole journey from day one to day four, showing every single trading day and how I made all of this happen in such a short amount of time in only 4 days. Once you know what you're doing, getting seven…

27 Jan 2026, 23:15 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026

I asked all of you on my IG what I'll go trading questions you guys have So I literally took every single one and answered it in this brand-new YouTube video. I talked about everything and even logged in to some of my accounts! If you always wanted to get into algo trading but you were not sure and you had questions, definitely watch this video as it will most likely answer any questions you had previously Click …

16 Jan 2026, 20:35 UTC464 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @axeltradesfree

Did you watch my latest vlog? If not you def should Watch here 👇 https://youtu.be/VRN0IGG4sW8

14 Jan 2026, 19:56 UTC508 viewsread 7 August 2026

We Are BACK with a MASSIVE vlog!! Nobody’s doing Miami like we’re doing it 🔥🔥 Matter of fact, I show myself using our trading algo to finance the whole trip, trade by trade! I also open up and reveal some things I never shared before https://youtu.be/VRN0IGG4sW8 P.S: doing a massive giveaway!! All you have to do to enter is leave a comment 3 random winners will be getting $500 each this time, so let’s run up th…

13 Jan 2026, 14:15 UTC404 viewsread 7 August 2026

WE'RE LIVE JOIN UPPPP 🔴 https://youtube.com/live/VmSwwDdljQY?feature=share

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @passyourchallengeexclusive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LawSikho lawyers' community (2)
@lawyerscommunity2 · 24,483
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PYC - Updates” (@passyourchallengeexclusive), 1,917 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/passyourchallengeexclusive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.