Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,741–11,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:01
11,758
+1
16 Sept 2026, 18:22
11,757
-5
14 Sept 2026, 18:59
11,762
-3
13 Sept 2026, 03:55
11,765
-1
11 Sept 2026, 06:00
11,766
-1
8 Sept 2026, 06:40
11,767
-16
4 Sept 2026, 23:59
11,783
-2
3 Sept 2026, 08:58
11,785
-5
2 Sept 2026, 02:04
11,790
-7
1 Sept 2026, 02:48
11,797
-3
31 Aug 2026, 04:25
11,800
-5
30 Aug 2026, 01:43
11,805
-2
29 Aug 2026, 00:38
11,807
-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:58
11,811
-3
26 Aug 2026, 21:55
11,814
-3
25 Aug 2026, 20:08
11,817
-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:54
11,820
-5
21 Aug 2026, 16:05
11,825
-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:47
11,826
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:15
11,827
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 11,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
23 (12 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
25,260
Reactions total
1,584
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 53s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,218 reactions across 23 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,195
28.3%
🤣
641
15.2%
💯
563
13.3%
😁
522
12.4%
👏
297
7.04%
🤮
288
6.83%
❤
259
6.14%
👌
120
2.84%
🤬
111
2.63%
🔥
47
1.11%
⚡
44
1.04%
💩
25
0.593%
🤡
18
0.427%
💊
17
0.403%
🍾
16
0.379%
😡
11
0.261%
🏆
10
0.237%
🤯
9
0.213%
🙏
7
0.166%
✍
3
0.071%
8 further kinds
15
0.356%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Když už jsme dnes zavadili o JAR:
V Radixu 10 jsem v tomto článku (viz obrázek) na součástky rozebral a do posledního šroubečku prozkoumal tři největší mýty:
📌MÝTUS Č. 1: BÍLÝ „ÚTLAK“ ČERNÉ „VĚTŠINY“
📌MÝTUS Č. 2: BÍLÍ VLÁDCI VYKOŘISŤOVALI
ČERNÉ PODDANÉ
📌MÝTUS Č. 3: JIHOAFRIČTÍ ČERNOŠI NENÁVIDĚLI BĚLOCHY A JEJICH NADVLÁDU
Hádejte, jak to dopadlo... Ne, nehádejte, přečtěte si to. 👉 https://eshop.nassmer.cz/radix-1…
Osvobozeni od „bílého muže“. A od pohlavních údů.
Kdysi byla Jihoafrická republika nejcivilizovanější, nejrozvinutější, nejbohatší, nejvíce prosperující a nejbezpečnější zemí afrického kontinentu. Vládl tam – bratru přísný – řád a pořádek.
Pak začal košer-bolševik ve spolupráci s komunistickou centrálou v Moskvě namlouvat místnímu bubáctvu, že pod bílými strašlivě trpí a mělo by se (to bubáctvo) od bílých „osvobodi…
Jana má moje absolutní pochopení.
Jana Horváthová rezignovala na funkci ředitelky Muzea romské kultury. Spoluzakladatelka muzea uvedla jako hlavní důvod únavu a přání věnovat se více své odborné práci.
Musí to být nepředstavitelně úmorné hledat v této oblasti cokoli „kulturního“, co by navíc stálo za to připomínat to v muzeu.
Já bych byl k smrti sedřený už po týdnu. Maximálně dvou.
——
➡️ t.me/pavelkamas
🌐 www.cas…
🚨Novinka (nejen) pro naše slovenské publikum🚨
https://eshop.nassmer.cz/partizanske-zlociny-v-pamati-naroda-iii-diel
Partyzáni byli za mě lidský odpad. Všude. Nejen na Slovensku. Dr. Lacko odvedl opět skvělou práci!⤵️
Tretí diel edície o výčinoch partizánov – ktorí boli desaťročia oslavovaní ako hrdinovia a osloboditelia – vychádza pri príležitosti 82. výročia vypuknutia povstania. Tento diel prináša 16 skutočných p…
Organizovaný transport maghrebských kobylek za evropskými holuby létajícími do huby pod dohledem marockého četnictva.
Moje stanovisko k Operaci Ceuta
——
➡️ t.me/pavelkamas
🌐 www.casopisradix.cz
Rabi Mizrachi: „Arabové zmasakrují Evropany kvůli jejich antisemitismu.“
Můj oblíbený rabín Yosef Mizrachi se zase rozpovídal. Arabové prý „velmi velmi brzy“ vybijou všechny Španěly, protože jsou to všechno „antisemité“ a vlastně celkově vůbec „náckové“. Totéž stihne zbytek Evropy.
Jak si to tak Yožin z obřezaných bažin brblal, hned jsem si vzpomněl na jednoho jeho kolegu, který zase tvrdil, že Mohamedovi zulukafři…
Lingvistické okénko: „Žid“ je urážka!
Já se omlouvám, ale:
1️⃣ pokud nazvat někoho „Židem“ je „antisemitismus“ a
2️⃣ slovo „Žid“ je vnímáno jako urážka,
pak to ergo kladívko znamená, že
3️⃣ židovská identita ztělesňuje něco negativního, ostudného nebo zavrženíhodného?
To já ne, to kamarád se ptá…
——
➡️ t.me/pavelkamas
🌐 www.casopisradix.cz
Rudý Sánchez přistoupil k řešení migrační záplavy dle očekávání typicky po levičácku:
1️⃣ místo aby vetřelce štando-péde vypakoval, kouká je nacpat do věrejných budov a sportovišť a legalizovat jejich pobyt, aby mohli na Španělsku parazitovat do aleluja;
2️⃣ nechává vetřelce dělat bordel a otravovat Španělům život;
Proto Španělům nezbylo nic jiného než postarat se o sebe sama:
Skupina místních ve španělské severoa…
Židovskou kapelu vyhodili z židovského festivalu kvůli kritice Izraele
Nepochybuji o tom, že letošní program „festivalu židovské kultury“ je náležitě pestrý:
📌 s přednáškou vystoupí pamětník, jenž – schován pod roštem – jako zázrakem přežil tři kremace;
📌 holé hrůzy z let 1942–1944 připomene odpolední čtení z autentického deníku, který slečna Franková sepsala kuličkovým perem vyrobeným v roce 1950;
📌 každý den bude …
KNIŽNÍ NOVINKA!
https://eshop.nassmer.cz/denik-skinheada-1980-1986
Deník skinheada je
záznamem sociálních dějin dvacátého století, kdy se mladí lidé přidávali k různým subkulturám. Byli tu punkeři, rockabilly, rockeři, tedové, novoromantici, mods, scooter boys, heavymetalisté, hippies a gotická subkultura. Ve dvanácti letech se Paul Burnley vydal ve stopách svého staršího bratra a přidal se k londýnským skinheadům. …
NOVÉ VIDEO!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiHidz6pgog
👌94👏35❤20👍14💯10⚡4🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @pavelkamas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pavel Kamas – NOVINKY” (@pavelkamas), 11,758 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelkamas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.