I feel empty without custom roms and my fans. Just this.
🤔18❤17🫡10🔥6🥴2🆒2🎉1🙈1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱

Channel
@pawelikchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
595subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001273666200 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pawelikchannel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pawelikchannel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 595 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 596 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 597 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 599 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 600 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 603 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 603 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
515 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 162 | 31.5% | |
| 🔥 | 153 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 7.57% | |
| 🫡 | 38 | 7.38% | |
| 🎉 | 28 | 5.44% | |
| 🥴 | 28 | 5.44% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 4.08% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 2.14% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 🤨 | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 1.17% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.777% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.777% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.194% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I feel empty without custom roms and my fans. Just this.
🤔18❤17🫡10🔥6🥴2🆒2🎉1🙈1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
🤨
❤11🔥2
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
As y'all may have seen, alitoh, citrus and lime are also dropped from official Infinity X. For all users, I wish the best maintainer, and sorry for my behavior. It was a pleasure to make the best custom ROM. Thanks to the Infinity team for this ROM, Tejas for being a really good friend, all users for using my ROM. For now, my development is halted. I may come back, but I don't think it will be in 2025. Have a nice da…
❤54🫡24👎2🔥1🥰1🥴1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Project Infinity X | v2.9 | POCO F3 / Redmi K40 / Mi 11X | Android 15 Released: 20/06/2025 • Download • Changelog • Support Group Notes: • KSU works • Both Gapps and Vanilla build available (If you don't know what is gapps or vanilla just flash gapps build) By @pawelik001 | PayPal | Ko-Fi Follow @pawelikchannel Join @pawelikhideout
❤23🔥1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Hello darkness my old friend. My main phone - Google Pixel 8 Pro have problems with microphone, and need to be sent to warranty. Before I do it, I'll go back to my old pal and set him up well. Ugh :(
🔥4❤2👍2
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Google is killing the custom ROM scene now. If you guys want 100% working ROM, always pass certification, and never have problems with safetynet, flash stock and lock bootloader. It's the best advice.
🥴25💩6❤3🤨3🤯1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Project Infinity X | v2.8 | POCO F3 / Redmi K40 / Mi 11X | Android 15 Released: 21/05/2025 • Download • Changelog • Support Group Notes: • KSU works • Both Gapps and Vanilla build available (If you don't know what is gapps or vanilla just flash gapps build) By @pawelik001 | PayPal | Ko-Fi Follow @pawelikchannel Join @pawelikhideout
🔥8👍4❤1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
I haven't wrote it here, but I should. Project Infinity X ROM for raphael is moved to @YourDulavai. Around 1.5 year ago I have asked him to pass me maintainership for Raphael, and he have done so. Thanks for it. But I wasn't the best and I'm still not the best - due of no time and lack of experience. Maintainership of Raphael is again @YourDulavai, the builds will appear faster, more frequently and at best quality. T…
❤12👍3🫡1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Project Infinity X | v2.8 | POCO M3 (citrus) & Redmi 9T / NFC (lime) | Android 15 Released: 13/05/2025 • Download • Support Group • Changelog Notes: • KSU Next works • Play certification passes and banking apps work (if not, update PIF in settings) • Downloading Google Photos from Play Store may be bugged, just download from other trusted source, like Aurora Store or ApkMirror • Both Gapps and Vanilla build availa…
🔥16❤6👍5🤯2
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥17🤯5🎉1👍1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
should chime build have micam? (with probably broken portrait)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Project Infinity X | v2.7 | POCO F3 / Redmi K40 / Mi 11X | Android 15 Released: 27/04/2025 • Download • Screenshots • Support Group Notes: • KSU works • MiuiCamera is included • Both Gapps and Vanilla build available (If you don't know what is gapps or vanilla just flash gapps build) By @pawelik001 | PayPal | Ko-Fi Follow @pawelikchannel Join @pawelikhideout
🔥15👍3❤2🤯2🏆1👎1
Signed pawelik001 🇵🇱
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pawelikchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
should chime build have micam? (with probably broken portrait)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 7 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pawelik channel” (@pawelikchannel), 595 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pawelikchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.