Channel
@payments_highrisk_eng
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,427subscribers
+108 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002088224138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @payments_highrisk_eng |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/payments_highrisk_eng |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 1,427 | +12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 1,415 | +13 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 1,402 | +13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 1,389 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:42 | 1,377 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 1,365 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 1,357 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 1,350 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 1,344 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 1,348 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 1,339 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 1,330 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 1,319 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 1,319 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Chile🇨🇱: local banks prepare to launch an instant payment system inspired by Brazil's Pix The project has been under development for one year, with its launch scheduled for the coming months. 💫 The platform does not yet have a commercial name, although it is reported to be in an advanced stage of development. 💫 The main objective is to expand the use of payment aliases and QR codes to facilitate transactions. 💫…
😎 Reform of Spain’s🇪🇸 Gambling Act: public consultation process continues As part of the public consultation launched in May, Spain's Directorate General for the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) is reviewing 50 proposals submitted by industry representatives to amend the 2011 Gambling Act. ➡️ Among the measures being considered by the Ministry of Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and Agenda 2030 — which oversees the DGO…
🆘 Ethiopia🇪🇹: betting market collapses after license cancellations as regulator maintains its official position In December 2025, all sports betting licenses in the country were revoked. Any expectation that the sector might be restored has effectively disappeared, according to an official notice recently published by the Ethiopian Lottery Service (ELS) on its Telegram channel. ➡️ Current situation: betting operato…
🇹🇷 Offer for P2P in Tukrey 🚶 #LongtermPartner #DealProven 🛠 For iGaming 🛠 Method: Havale ✅ Pay-In – 6% from 500 to 100 000 TRY ✅ Pay-Out – 1% from 3 000 to 100 000 TRY ⚡ Integration H2H, payform ⚡ Settlement T+3, Binance, Bank Transfer +3% #paymentoffer #tr Contact: @agent_phr
🦫 Poland🇵🇱: is it time to ease gambling regulation❓ Poland is currently debating whether to relax its gambling regulatory framework, which is considered one of the strictest in Europe. The aim is to stimulate growth in the regulated market, although public policy concerns and consumer protection remain key factors in the discussion. 📌 Background In 2009, Poland was affected by a political scandal that undermined p…
👀 Myanmar🇲🇲: life sentences introduced for operating scam centers and cryptocurrency fraud In addition, Parliament approved the death penalty for individuals who force people to work in fraudulent call centers, including cases involving kidnapping, unlawful detention, torture, and other related offenses. 😬 Background: at the end of 2025, reports revealed the existence of a transnational criminal network that recrui…
🏴☠️ The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA)🇪🇺 has filed an official complaint with the Bank of Lithuania🇱🇹 The complaint concerns Walletto, a payment service provider registered in Lithuania. The regulator alleges that the company processed payments for illegal online gambling operators. 💡 Walletto is alleged to have misclassified merchant category codes (MCCs), which may have allowed the true nature of…
🇵🇪 Offer for Yape and Transfers in Peru 🚶 #IndustryKnown 🛠 For iGaming 🛠 FTD + STD Method: Bank Transfer ✅ Pay-In – 3,2% + 5,5 PEN from 25 to 30 000 PEN ✅ Pay-Out – 2,8% from 25 to 30 000 PEN Method: E-Wallets (Yape) ✅ Pay-In – 3,4% from 25 to 30 000 PEN ⚡ Settlement T+2, 2%, Finance Yahoo +0.5% #paymentoffer #pe Contact: @agent_phr
😱 Bulgaria🇧🇬: Ministry of Finance, tax authority, and Parliament prepare comprehensive gambling law reform The objective of the reform is to facilitate compliance for licensed operators while targeting the broader ecosystem that enables the operation of unlicensed gambling operators. The proposed framework extends beyond payment service providers and seeks to address other actors involved in supporting the unregula…
😱 United Arab Emirates🇦🇪: investigation links an Iranian illegal gambling network to the movement of more than USD 4 billion through Shelbit Since May 2024, an investigation has linked an Iranian illegal gambling network to the movement of at least USD 4 billion through the cryptocurrency company Shelbit. The company operated from the top floor of a budget hotel in Dubai, in a lower-profile district, functioning as…
❤1
🙈 Brazil🇧🇷: Treasury investigated 73 online betting operators and imposed USD 2.17 million in fines over 18 months Since the launch of Brazil's regulated gambling market, more than 100 administrative proceedings have been initiated against betting operators for alleged regulatory violations. According to information obtained in June 2026 under the Access to Information Law and published by Folha de S.Paulo, enforcem…
🇹🇷 Turkey | TRY 🚶 #NewPartner #DealProven Offer for agents, account holders and cashiers ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ PayIn: 3,6% 📉 Exchange rate: Binance, 5 lines 🔐 Guarantee Deposit: 700 USD 💼 Deposit: from 300 USD ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Connect → @agent_phr
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @payments_highrisk_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Payments and high risk” (@payments_highrisk_eng), 1,427 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/payments_highrisk_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.