Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПК-Plus 🖥💻⌨️🤘

Channel

ПК-Plus 🖥💻⌨️🤘

@pc_plus_ua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,606subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905816257
TypeChannel
Username@pc_plus_ua
Created16 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pc_plus_ua

Growth

10,60610,67610,6416 August 2026 — 10,675 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,675 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,676 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,675 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,662 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,657 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,654 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,657 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,647 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,644 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,635 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,632 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,634 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,632 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,629 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,624 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,628 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,622 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,621 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,613 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,611 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,608 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,596–10,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:3210,606-2
29 Aug 2026, 06:3310,608-3
28 Aug 2026, 03:3610,611-2
27 Aug 2026, 01:2810,613-8
25 Aug 2026, 22:5310,621-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:5910,622-6
23 Aug 2026, 08:0310,628+4
21 Aug 2026, 19:0610,624-5
20 Aug 2026, 16:1410,629-3
19 Aug 2026, 14:3310,632-2
18 Aug 2026, 15:4310,634+2
17 Aug 2026, 17:4610,632-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:5310,635-9
15 Aug 2026, 00:0310,644-3
13 Aug 2026, 12:0810,647-10
12 Aug 2026, 09:3210,657+3
11 Aug 2026, 12:0810,654-3
10 Aug 2026, 09:3810,657-5
9 Aug 2026, 11:5210,662-13
8 Aug 2026, 09:5110,675first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.6%
avg views ÷ 10,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,420
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held93 (2 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total410,680
Reactions total7,515
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 31s
Average length
3m 03s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,348 reactions across 91 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,43919.6%
👍1,30817.8%
99413.5%
🤣3995.43%
🤬3945.36%
😢3815.19%
🔥3664.98%
😱2623.57%
🤮2473.36%
👏2092.84%
🤡2012.74%
💯1992.71%
👎1441.96%
🤯1231.67%
🤔1081.47%
💊1061.44%
😨991.35%
❤‍🔥710.966%
🥴550.749%
🤪500.68%
25 further kinds1932.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 93 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pc_plus_ua. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.08%
1 of 93 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
4,220
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,320
over 92 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,970 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Огляд мого смартфону Xiaomi 17 Ultra, котрий коштує 68К грн. - вже на каналі. https://youtu.be/aBBDxQAb5qA

👍204💩2🤣2🤡1🤯1

29 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,530 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

DLSS 5 вже запустили на RTX 40 — але поки неофіційно Модерам вдалося запустити експериментальну версію DLSS 5 Neural Rendering не тільки на RTX 50, а й на відеокартах RTX 40, включно з RTX 4090 та RTX 4080. Але є нюанс — продуктивність поки що сильно падає. Наприклад, в окремих тестах: 👉 RTX 4090: приблизно 135 → 82 FPS 👉 RTX 5070 у Cyberpunk 2077: 138 → 68 FPS Тобто зараз DLSS 5 працює скоріше як технічна демонстр

😁241👍1

28 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈3,340 views72 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

DLSS 5 уже запустили у Cyberpunk 2077, GTA V та десятках інших ігор Модерам знадобилося менше доби, щоб розтягнути експериментальний DLSS 5 Neural Rendering на купу ігор. Усе працює через RenoDX та витік бібліотеки DLSS 5 розміром 158 МБ з NBA 2K27. Уже протестували: Cyberpunk 2077, GTA V, RDR2, The Last of Us Part II, Hogwarts Legacy, Black Myth: Wukong, Starfield, Silent Hill 2, Monster Hunter Wilds та інші. Але з

40🤮18🔥10👍4

28 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,620 views76 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Xbox Series S пророкують важку долю, після того як вийшов геймплей GTA 6

😁724

28 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC≈3,860 views106 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

А от і GTA 6 офіційно. Як вам?

62👎19👍11🥱6🔥5🤮1🤷‍♂1🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC≈3,970 views113 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Новий DLSS 5 вже встигли протестувати в Control - поки що виглядає так, що технологія в основному фокусується на покращенні лиць

🤮67🤣25👍18🔥21

27 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈3,950 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔥 AMD підтвердила дві лінійки Zen 6 для сокета AM5 В офіційній технічній документації AMD засвітилися одразу дві майбутні сім'ї процесорів Zen 6, які отримають підтримку актуального сокета AM5. Olympic Ridge — наступне покоління настільних Ryzen. За попередніми витоками, один CCD може отримати до 12 ядер Zen 6, а топові моделі — до 24 ядер / 48 потоків. Також ходять чутки про появу NPU замість звичної вбудованої гр

👍23🔥11😁2

27 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈4,020 views62 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

DLSS 5 вже засвітився в реальній грі — і важить утричі більше за DLSS 4 У файлах раннього доступу NBA 2K27 знайшли нову бібліотеку NVIDIA, пов’язану з DLSS 5 Neural Rendering. Це, схоже, перший випадок, коли DLL нової технології потрапила до публічної збірки гри. Файл має версію 310.8.0.0 і важить аж 158 МБ. Для порівняння, DLL DLSS Super Resolution зазвичай займають близько 20–50 МБ — тобто новий компонент приблизн

44👎12🔥5😁1

26 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈4,220 views94 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

В кого немає компа — грає на смартфоні в часи дефіциту. Що там, кажете, по іграх? P.S. Хай друг не питає — адмін назви не знає.

😁52🤣27💩96

26 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC≈4,060 views53 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Rockstar прокоментувала витік матеріалів GTA VI. У студії зізналися, що передчасна поява геймплею в мережі стала серйозним ударом для команди, та вибачилися перед фанатами за те, що їм довелося вперше побачити гру саме в такому вигляді. «Ми дуже раді, що вже завтра ви побачите розширений матеріал про гру. Його підготовка зайняла більше часу, ніж ми планували, але наше головне завдання — перевершити ваші очікування.

👍435🤷‍♂3🤡1🤪1

26 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC≈3,960 views71 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Білл Гейтс попередив: технологічні компанії недооцінюють загрози штучного інтелекту. За його словами, публічно представники ШІ-індустрії часто демонструють оптимізм, однак у приватних розмовах самі керівники технологічних компаній висловлюють серйозне занепокоєння розвитком ШІ та можливими наслідками.

👏60👍62👾2😁1

26 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈3,980 views81 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Фанат Asus пролетів як "фанера над Парижем" Користувач Reddit заплатив $10 350 за ювілейний комплект ASUS ROG — але так його і не отримав Він оформив передзамовлення на дорогущий набір ROG 20th Anniversary Bundle у перший день продажів у США. ASUS навіть створила трекінг для доставки, але вже наступного дня його скасували. Після кількох звернень у підтримку покупець дізнався, що посилку повернули назад ASUS, а зам

💊628🤯6😁4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @pc_plus_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTCAnonymous Poll1,570 voters approx.

Фіналочка! 🔥 Об’єднуємо по 3 переможці з двох попередніх опитувань і дивимося на остаточну картину по оперативі зараз у наших ПК? 💻 Голосуйте, якщо бачите свій варіант. А якщо вашого немає — обирайте «Подивитись результати» 👀

  1. 12 ГБ (унікал) 🦹🏻2%
  2. 16 ГБ (дрищ) 🤷27%
  3. 24 ГБ (ні туди — ні сюди) 🧜‍♂️3%
  4. 32 ГБ (банальний мужик) 👨‍🦰58%
  5. 48 ГБ (цікавий мужик) 🧔🏾2%
  6. 64 ГБ (ну, мужик!) 👍😼10%
  7. Подивитись результати6%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTCAnonymous Poll2,420 voters approx.

Скільки оперативи наразі в твоєму ПК/Ноуті?

  1. 1) 2 Гб (труп) 🤢0%
  2. 2) 4 Гб (дно) 😱1%
  3. 3) 8 Гб (бомж)🧙‍♂5%
  4. 4) 16 Гб (дрищ)🤷31%
  5. 5) 32 Гб (банальний мужик)👨‍🦰58%
  6. 6) 64 Гб (ну, мужик!)👍😼9%
  7. 7) 128 Гб (не з такої сім'ї..)🫰1%
  8. 8) 256 Гб (та ти шо @хуел?)😡1%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 786,415 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПК-Plus 🖥💻⌨️🤘” (@pc_plus_ua), 10,606 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pc_plus_ua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.