این پک رو به تلگرامتون اضافه کنید و دیگه دنبال پروژه،موقعیت شغلی، فیلم آموزشی، کتاب و جزوه که هر روز بهش نیاز داری نگرد!🔽
Signed Abdi

Channel
@pcmabani
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,942subscribers
-179 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002029644876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pcmabani |
| Description | نوابغ کامپیوتر | سعید صفایی بزرگترین آرشیو فیلم های آموزشی برای دانشجویان ▪️وبسایت: SaeidSafaei.ir ▫️پی وی: @SaeidSafaei_ir ▫️اینستاگرام: itlogist ... تعامل و تبلیغات @Poourya729 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pcmabani |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:29 | 18,942 | +77 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:20 | 18,865 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 18,877 | +27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:05 | 18,850 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 18,857 | +6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 18,851 | +48 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:29 | 18,803 | +35 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 18,768 | +11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 18,757 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 18,760 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 18,773 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 18,795 | +73 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 18,722 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 18,734 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 18,736 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 18,741 | +25 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:25 | 18,716 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 18,719 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 18,730 | -21 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 18,751 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 29 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (29 April 2025 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,559 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
152 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 8.55% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 8.55% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.658% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.658% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2025 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
این پک رو به تلگرامتون اضافه کنید و دیگه دنبال پروژه،موقعیت شغلی، فیلم آموزشی، کتاب و جزوه که هر روز بهش نیاز داری نگرد!🔽
Signed Abdi
✅ پک کامل گرافیک ، نرم افزار و کاریابی هرچی یک طراح لازم داره، یکجا. دسترسی رایگان ✨ https://t.me/addlist/imDnkG8aIJA3ZTI8
Signed Abdi
😎 من میتونم بهت "هوش مصنوعی رایگان " یاد بدم. 👈 بیا اینجا: @iGraphical 😎 من میتونم بهت " ابزار گرافیکی رایگان" بدم. 👈 بیا اینجا: @editorclub 😎اگه " دنبال آموزش فتوشاپی " 👈 بیا اینجا: @Architect_City 😎 ترندهای طراحی ، هنر و خلاقیت میخوای ببینی؟ 👈بیا اینجا : @AR_NOSRATI 😎آموزش تولید محتوای حرفه ای میخوای؟ 👈بیا اینجا : @tadwingaran 😎 پروژه بگیر پول پارو کن!! 👈 بیا اینجا: @Freelancer_Booth 😎 دنبال کسب درآمد اینت…
Signed Abdi
🚨 دوره +Security؛ از مبانی امنیت تا ورود به دنیای SOC اگه میخوای امنیت سایبری رو اصولی یاد بگیری و قدم اولت رو برای ورود به دنیای SOC برداری، این دوره میتونه شروع خوبی برات باشه. 🔥 💻 توی این دوره چی یاد میگیری؟ 🔹 مبانی امنیت سایبری 🔹 امنیت شبکه و Web Security 🔹 Firewall و سیستمهای IDS/IPS 🔹 ابزارهای امنیتی و بهترین روشهای امنیتی 🔹 آموزش عملی و پروژهمحور با سناریوهای واقعی 🎯 ویژگیهای دوره: ✅ آموزش آنلاین ✅ پ…
🔥1
Signed Saeid Safaei
@PCMabani
❤5👍1
Signed Saeid Safaei
📣 دعوت به همکاری | نیروی تولید محتوادعوت به همکاری | نیروی تولید محتوا اگر به تولید محتوا، فضای مجازی و یادگیری و رشد علاقهمندی، ما دنبال یک همکار پرانرژی هستیم که به تیممون اضافه بشه. 🌱✨ 📍 **محل فعالیت: شرکت کارگزاری نت بیمه * اگر با ابزارهایی مثل: 🎬 CapCut 🎥 Premiere 🎨 Photoshop 📱 ابزارهای تولید و ادیت محتوا کار کردی، این یک مزیت محسوب میشه. همچنین اگر: ✨ ایدهپردازی و خلاقیت داری ✨ به یادگیری و پیشرفت علاقه…
Signed Saeid Safaei
🔴اگه تلگرام دسکتاپ داری، حتماً آپدیتش کن! 🔴 یه گزارش امنیتی درباره آسیبپذیری تلگرام دسکتاپ منتشر شده که طبق ادعای پژوهشگر، میتونه با کلیک روی یه لینک مخرب، راه رو برای سرقت سشن و دسترسی به حساب کاربری باز کنه. 🔴 گفته شده این مشکل در نسخههای قدیمیتر از 7.2.9 وجود داشته و در نسخه 7.2.9 برطرف شده؛ نسخهای که در ۱۶ سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶ منتشر شده. ▪️ تلگرام دسکتاپ رو به آخرین نسخه بهروزرسانی کنید. ▪️ روی لینکهای ناشناس و…
Signed Saeid Safaei
نوابغ کامپیوتر pinned Deleted message
🏆 افتخاری علمی برای جامعه مهندسی کامپیوتر؛ درخشش دکتر مصطفی قبائی آرانی در جمع ۲٪ برتر دانشمندان جهان در سال ۲۰۲۶ 🌍 با افتخار، قرارگیری نام دکتر مصطفی قبائی آرانی، دانشیار گروه مهندسی کامپیوتر دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قم در فهرست ۲ درصد برتر دانشمندان جهان در سال ۲۰۲۶، در ارزیابیهای بلندمدت و یکساله را تبریک میگوییم. 🏆 این دستاورد ارزشمند، بیانگر سالها تلاش علمی، فعالیتهای پژوهشی و مشارکت در توسعه دانش و فناوری …
👏7❤3💯1
Signed Saeid Safaei
🛑 کنکور ارشد کامپیوتر بازیِ «کی بیشتر میخونه» نیست! بازیِ «کی هوشمندتر میجنگه» است! 💻🔥 خسته شدی از بس کتابهای چندصد صفحهای رو خوندی و تهش حس میکنی هیچی یادت نیست؟ رتبهبرترها فقط «مهندسیتر» از تو جلو میرن. در وبینار «جراحی کنکور ارشد کامپیوتر»، با استراتژی مهندسی معکوس، کنکور رو برای خودمون ساده میکنیم. 🩺 سرفصلهای وبینار: ✅ جراحی زنده برنامه مطالعاتی: اصلاح مستقیم برنامه یکی از شرکتکنندهها برای یادگیری مد…
Signed Saeid Safaei
🚀دیگه هزینه نجومی برای اشتراکای هوش مصنوعی نکن!! @GptPLuserBot ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ دانلود تمام پکیج های فرانش، سبز لرن و... (فول رایگان) 🎁@Computer_IT_Engineering کسب درآمد از طراحی وب سایت + سئو حرفه ای 🎁@AmoozeshWebsite آبجکت های رایگان 3DMax 🎁@Voxel3DVray آموزش فتوشاپ و ایلاستریتور 🎁@limostudy آموزش تکنیک های زبان انگلیسی 🎁@PTEnglishtest1 دانلود برنامه اندرویدی ها 🎁@Android_best انگلیسی از مبتدی تا پیشرفته 🎁@Eng_Onl…
Signed Abdi
📌 ایده، پروژه، ابزارکار و آموزش هایی که لازم دارید رو کاملا رایگان از کانالهای بالا دریافت کنید!
Signed Abdi
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @pcmabani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @pcmabani as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 53 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pcmabani named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نوابغ کامپیوتر” (@pcmabani), 18,942 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pcmabani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.