Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش امنیت سایبری | پنتیفای

Channel

آموزش امنیت سایبری | پنتیفای

@pentifyteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,076subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108895217
TypeChannel
Username@pentifyteam
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pentifyteam

Growth

19,07619,28819,1827 August 2026 — 19,288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,276 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,272 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,258 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,251 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,236 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,204 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,193 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,196 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,201 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,204 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,175 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,137 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,127 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,146 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,144 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,141 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,130 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,116 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,123 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,114 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,116 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,112 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,076 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 29 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,044–19,320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 18:5619,076-36
3 Sept 2026, 14:3819,112-4
2 Sept 2026, 10:3819,116+2
31 Aug 2026, 07:3519,114-9
30 Aug 2026, 06:3319,123+7
29 Aug 2026, 03:0219,116-14
28 Aug 2026, 00:3219,130-11
27 Aug 2026, 02:3719,141-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:0719,144-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:3619,146+19
24 Aug 2026, 04:2419,127-10
22 Aug 2026, 10:2219,137-38
20 Aug 2026, 21:3519,175-29
19 Aug 2026, 18:3319,204+3
18 Aug 2026, 21:3519,201+5
17 Aug 2026, 18:5519,196+3
16 Aug 2026, 14:5719,193-11
14 Aug 2026, 22:1519,204-32
13 Aug 2026, 12:3719,236-15
12 Aug 2026, 15:3319,251first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.89%
avg views ÷ 19,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,700
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.369%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held24 (7 June 202621 August 2026)
Views total6,780
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4422.6%
🔥4322.1%
👾2914.9%
💯2713.8%
🎃199.74%
🥰199.74%
147.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📚 رخنه در مرورگر؛ چگونه هکرها با یک اسکریپت ساده کنترل سایت شما را به دست می‌گیرند؟ 📝 در این مقاله با یکی از خطرناک‌ ترین و متداول‌ ترین آسیب‌ پذیری‌ های دنیای وب (XSS) آشنا خواهید شد؛ جایی که یک مهاجم تنها با تزریق چند خط کد جاوا اسکریپت در یک فرم جستجوی ساده، می‌تواند کوکی‌های کاربران را سرقت کرده و کل امنیت پلتفرم شما را به چالش بکشد 📖 آنچه در این مقاله خواهید آموخت : 🔹 ماجرای تزریق کدهای مخرب و تفاوت ساختاری ح

👾4🔥3🎃1💯1

13 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,810 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📚 شکار در کوهستان؛ چگونه یک عکس تار، جان کوهنورد گم شده را نجات داد؟ 📝 در این مقاله با یکی از هیجان انگیزترین و انسانی ترین پرونده های دنیای OSINT (اطلاعات متن باز) آشنا خواهید شد؛ جایی که یک تحلیلگر تنها با بررسی یک عکس ساده و تار، موفق شد موقعیت دقیق کوهنوردی گم شده در دل جنگل های کالیفرنیا را روی نقشه پیدا کند و او را از مرگ حتمی نجات دهد. 📖 آنچه در این مقاله خواهید آموخت : 🔹 ماجرای ناپدید شدن رنه کپک در کوهستا

1❤‍🔥1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,990 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

قسمت چهارم از رادیو پنتیفای | fomo | مهدی رضایی فومو چیه ؟ من نه حرفه ای هستم نه تولید کننده محتوا فقط با دانش کمم به بقیه کمک میکنم -mehdi @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

💯3👾21❤‍🔥1🎃1

11 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,900 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

fomo ترس از عقب ماندگی برای شنیدن این قسمت از رادیو پنتیفای فایل بعدی رو گوش کنید 😉 @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

❤‍🔥21🎃1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC≈3,060 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📚 فریب پایگاه داده؛ چگونه یک کوتیشن ساده، تمام اسرار سایت را فاش می‌کند؟ 📝 در این مقاله با یکی از قدیمی‌ترین، مخرب‌ترین و پرتکرارترین حملات تاریخ وب (SQL Injection) آشنا می‌شوید؛ جایی که هکرها تنها با وارد کردن چند کاراکتر خاص در یک فرم لاگین یا نوار جستجوی ساده، ساختار کوئری‌ها را می‌شکنند و به جای اپلیکیشن، مستقیماً کنترل پایگاه داده را برای سرقت و دستکاری اطلاعات به دست می‌گیرند. 📖 آنچه در این مقاله خواهید آموخت

🎃4💯21👾1🔥1🥰1

13 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC≈3,890 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

سلام به همه دوستان عزیز با توجه به اینکه این روزها وارد فصل امتحانات شدیم دوباره تعداد زیادی تیکت با موضوع شکستن قفل فایل‌ های PDF آزمون‌ ها دریافت می‌کنیم چون این موضوع بارها بررسی و تحلیل شده خواستیم یک بار دیگه بهش اشاره کنیم واقعیت اینه که بیشتر این فایل‌های PDF فقط سؤالات سال‌ های قبل یا فایل‌ های معمولی هستن که با یک قفل ظاهری منتشر می‌شن هدف اصلی هم اینه که شما رو بین مطالعه و کنجکاوی برای باز کردن فایل قرار

💯9🔥6👾2🥰2

6 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC≈4,250 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

قسمت سوم از رادیو پنتیفای | ربات مزاحم یاب | مهدی رضایی داستان پشت پرده ربات های مزاحم یاب چیه؟ من نه حرفه ای هستم نه تولید کننده محتوا فقط با دانش کمم به بقیه کمک میکنم -mehdi @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

🔥6❤‍🔥3🎃2👾2💯2🥰2

6 Jul 2026, 21:50 UTC≈3,520 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ربات های مزاحم یاب و داستان پشت پرده💣 برای شنیدن این قسمت از رادیو پنتیفای فایل بعدی رو گوش کنید 😉 @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

🔥4🎃2👾2💯2🥰1

5 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,290 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

آموزش ران کردن + سورس @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

2🔥2🎃1👾1

5 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,190 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

معرفی سورس + آموزش استفاده لوکال⛓️‍💥⛓️ کاربرد سورس : سورس تبدیل عکس به webp مناسب افرادی است که نیاز دارند عکس های خودشون رو به webp تبدیل کنند . این پروژه توسط تیم پنتیفای نوشته شده است 🎊 لینک گیت هاب سورس @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

❤‍🔥41🎃1👾1🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC≈2,820 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📚 شکار شناسه در اعماق وب؛ چگونه چند عدد ساده، اسرار دیتابیس‌ها را فاش می‌کنند؟ 📝 در این مقاله با یکی از جذاب‌ ترین و در عین حال رایج‌ ترین فرآیندهای دنیای تست نفوذ و امنیت وب (IDOR) آشنا خواهید شد؛ جایی که متخصصان امنیت و هکرها تنها با بررسی و تغییر چند شناسه عددی ساده در آدرس مرورگر یا درخواست‌های ارسالی، موفق می‌شوند به اطلاعات محرمانه کاربران دیگر دسترسی پیدا کنند یا آن‌ها را دستکاری کنند 📖 آنچه در این مقاله خوا

❤‍🔥4🥰21🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC≈4,170 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

قسمت دوم از رادیو پنتیفای | y2k | مهدی رضایی باگ چی بود و چرا این باگ باعث هرج و مرج توی زمان خودش میشد من نه حرفه ای هستم نه تولید کننده خوب محتوا فقط با دانش کمم به بقیه کمک میکنم -mehdi @pentifyteam | pentify.ir

❤‍🔥4💯3🎃2👾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @pentifyteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

فیلترشکن NaT VpN
@Natvpn · 34,734
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 3 September 2026
Passer VPN
@PasserMobile01 · 65,316
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش امنیت سایبری | پنتیفای” (@pentifyteam), 19,076 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pentifyteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.