Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Перекись

Channel

Перекись

@peraxide

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

239subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002236102622
TypeChannel
Username@peraxide
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/peraxide

Growth

238241239.57 August 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 238 subscribers14 August 2026 — 239 subscribers22 August 2026 — 241 subscribers9 September 2026 — 240 subscribers16 September 2026 — 239 subscribers2397 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 238–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:01239-1
9 Sept 2026, 00:17240-1
22 Aug 2026, 11:56241+2
14 Aug 2026, 07:15239+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:57238-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:33239no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:03239first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11129.6%
🔥7018.7%
💔4512.0%
🥰379.87%
😍236.13%
215.60%
😨164.27%
❤‍🔥123.20%
💘92.40%
👀51.33%
41.07%
🖕41.07%
30.8%
👏30.8%
💯30.8%
🍓20.533%
🎄20.533%
👍20.533%
💋20.533%
😢10.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC115 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чё-то в интернетах щас бурлят по поводу нейрослопного клипа монеточки, как будто всë её так называемое творчество само по себе не хуйня ебаная. Кому не похуй на неё вообще? Ах да, она же комфортик, тогда ладно

🔥111

1 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А у меня вот вопрос чисто риторический возник, какого хуя Пьеро (АКА глава Фатуи, АКА правая рука Царицы, АКА её потомок, АКА одно из ключевых лиц в её плане) стоит где-то в пизде рядом с собачьей миской, а две рандом шлюхи у Царицы чуть ли не на коленях сидят. У него походу реально единственная задача это просто на Ронову смотреть

8

1 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC144 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Я всегда в него верил бля

194

31 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC157 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну снежная прикольно, но ронова кнш что в 2д ублюдина, что в 3д. Как по мне хайп все таки не дожали, можно было и побольше пафоса насрать, но с другой стороны про какую игру вообще речь. 7/10

15❤‍🔥4🍓1

30 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Пере-

  1. -залить39%
  2. -резать себе горло на камеру под Сумасшедшая весна32%
  3. Единая Россия29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🎄2

29 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC297 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

скидывайтесь мне на новый комп

23💘9❤‍🔥7👏32💋1

29 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC188 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Верхний постер выглядит красиво, а на нижнем очень не хватает пост ироничного высера шрифтом импакт

161👍1

27 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC213 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я отрыл модельку нового блейда, вас такая ПОЛНАЯ ХУЕТЕНЬ ждет вы даже не представляете

😍202🔥2🍓1

24 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC243 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пацаны у миня слошный выбар мне умиреть или сделать эдит

😨16👀5🖕4

19 Jul 2026, 23:05 UTC343 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скучнейший финал чм, все отсосали, Мбаппе заслуженно, Аллах Акбар

13👍1🥰1

18 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC341 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥134🥰21❤‍🔥1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @peraxide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

Пере-

  1. -залить39%
  2. -резать себе горло на камеру под Сумасшедшая весна32%
  3. Единая Россия29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Перекись” (@peraxide), 239 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peraxide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.