Channel
@perestroykazavtra
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
391subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001927617377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @perestroykazavtra |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/perestroykazavtra |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 391 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 388 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 392 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 393 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 387 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 385 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:49 | 385 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
74 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5296319456270639089 | 21 | 28.4% | |
| custom 5402141901346336243 | 15 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5303176981444058590 | 12 | 16.2% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 10.8% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 10.8% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| custom 5278222568619269051 | 4 | 5.41% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
недавно был такой тейк приведён, что у меня нет личности + стеклянные глаза. ну да, вот подтверждение данного тезиса, я была рождена такой. вот мои стеклянные глаза в 8-9 лет. и тут же моё подтверждение отсутствия личности - просто играю роли, которые мне прописал мой лучший друг детства. все очевидно. данные тейки были приведены с желанием меня разъебать, раскрыть, рассекретить, а я этого и не скрываю. я рада, что я…
⚡4💔1
я наткнулась на невероятного формата контент, который мы снимали с моим лучшим другом в 3ем классе мне почему-то казалось, что я была автором большинства штук, которые мы делали вместе, но сейчас понимаю, что большую часть времени я просто смешно флексила, а он занимался монтажом и пытался превратить наши кривляния хоть в какую-то форму
custom 52963194562706390894⚡1custom 52782225686192690511custom 54021419013463362431
люблю своих друзей и москву) и подмосковье тоже) не знаю как буду без них просто благодарна за всё хорошее и даже не хорошее
❤7
даже шутить как-то не хочется, просто не каждый день благославляют на съёмку
custom 54021419013463362436custom 52963194562706390895custom 52782225686192690513
File, posted without a caption
пройти
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚡1
мне так нравится эстетика всех этих глупых девчачьих фильмов после которых хочется найти все свои розовые ленточки завязывать на шею мальчикам хихикать гулять по парку оглядываться абы кто не увидел что я курю сигарету.... девственницы самоубийцы, прерванная жизнь, хорошая девочка, леон.... мне никогда не стать прежней сводящей с ума кокеткой
custom 52963194562706390898
этот канал ведётся ангелом и собакой
custom 54021419013463362434custom 52963194562706390893⚡1
и между тем, что-то происходит в россии и я снова читаю свои стихи
custom 53031769814440585906
поразительно, но ведь есть люди, которые не были на спектакле проваловой, а между прочим это единственный спектакль, который был мной поставлен сейчас не знаю успею ли поставить ещё один, но если хотите поучаствовать, то пишите (времени только пара недель на организацию, поэтому если делать то уже щас) пис...
custom 54021419013463362433⚡1❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53031769814440585901
(Žeňce Severu_※※※) /третий Řím мůй ✦ бревенчатый и дворцовый, закрытый железным каменем, но при этом pokopavšiсь внутри окна, горящего в пять ут※ра такой бесконечно свободный / 𓆸 оставивший по моему телу следы своих катаклизмов, высоко над землёй или под; может слишком※низко я хранила свои обещания, oставляла записки ты их забирал, и пробежкой быстро разносил по краям необъятной ✦ nakouřivšis zachtělo se brát kreml в…
custom 53031769814440585905custom 52963194562706390891custom 54021419013463362431
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @perestroykazavtra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
пройти
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“меня зовут вячеславя*” (@perestroykazavtra), 391 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perestroykazavtra.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.