Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Personal Witches

Channel

Personal Witches

@personal_witches

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,786subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001416770816
TypeChannel
Username@personal_witches
DescriptionЭстетика женских архетипов. Мистика, фетиш, кино, ведьмы. Изучаю феномен Ведьм и темы потустороннего в истории кино, литературы, модной индустрии, психологии и фольклора.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/personal_witches

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6997,7977,7487 August 2026 — 7,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,701 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,704 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,708 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,718 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,723 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,733 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,735 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,743 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,741 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,755 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,765 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,781 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,784 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,793 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,797 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,790 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,783 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,776 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,783 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,786 subscribers7,7867 August 20264 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 89 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,684–7,812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 22:317,786+3
2 Nov 2026, 02:497,783+7
29 Oct 2026, 20:277,776-7
26 Oct 2026, 17:067,783-7
23 Oct 2026, 08:167,790-7
20 Oct 2026, 18:117,797+4
17 Oct 2026, 17:077,793+9
14 Oct 2026, 08:417,784+3
10 Oct 2026, 23:367,781+16
26 Sept 2026, 16:017,765+10
15 Sept 2026, 21:367,755+14
12 Sept 2026, 15:367,741-2
8 Sept 2026, 18:197,743+8
3 Sept 2026, 04:147,735+2
30 Aug 2026, 23:447,733+10
27 Aug 2026, 20:257,723+5
24 Aug 2026, 22:467,718+10
21 Aug 2026, 01:057,708+9
14 Aug 2026, 05:367,699-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:247,704first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 7,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
971
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held29 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total4,856
Reactions total413
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,520
Videos
≈238
Links
≈168

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,526 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528090331970172092476921.8%
custom 539084889902182498172220.5%
custom 525849839946383183165418.5%
custom 530781373364753424346213.1%
custom 51883499097990441983399.61%
custom 53891028273122797303028.56%
custom 52628958189097195811975.59%
custom 5262843725251384904812.30%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 29 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @personal_witches. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 05:42 UTC647 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Фрейд (сериал) 2020 Freud Вена, 1886 год. Происходит серия убийств сначала проституток, затем детей, потом приходит черёд аристократов. Полиция сбивается с ног в поисках неуловимого маньяка, пока ветеран Альфред Кисс не натыкается на молодого психиатра Зигмунда Фрейда. Будущий отец психоанализа пока что никому толком неизвестен, а вечера коротает на званых ужинах венского высшего общества, где однажды знакомится с я…

custom 530781373364753424331custom 539084889902182498112custom 51883499097990441987

3 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC809 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/yJ2GxYLnDOQ?si=I16E3M0g8u83oyYo

custom 53908488990218249815custom 52809033197017209242custom 52584983994638318311

1 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,120 views164 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

снег ещё толком не выпал, тем временем я:

custom 518834990979904419872custom 530781373364753424354custom 539084889902182498126custom 53891028273122797309custom 52628437252513849043

31 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,200 views146 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @pautina_666Photo

каждую осень пересматриваю и вам советую witchcraft (1996)🖤🖤

custom 530781373364753424396custom 539084889902182498122custom 518834990979904419816custom 528090331970172092411custom 53891028273122797301

31 Oct 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,080 views45 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 526289581890971958125custom 530781373364753424312custom 51883499097990441988

28 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC597 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53078137336475342438

28 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC624 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

и все такие пост дружненько в избранное кинули и пошли. ну вы писи деловые, конечно

custom 528090331970172092434custom 53078137336475342437custom 51883499097990441985custom 52628958189097195813

28 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC678 views87 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

всем привет 🖤 поделитесь своими любимыми средствами для уборки желательно с артикулами 👍, пожалуйста. Тряпки, швабры, губки и прочий текстиль тоже будут кстати. честно признаюсь, я не люблю уборку 😱приходится всячески романтизировать этот процесс. хелп ми

custom 525849839946383183155custom 539084889902182498117custom 52809033197017209248custom 52628437252513849043custom 53078137336475342432custom 52628958189097195811custom 53891028273122797301

28 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC608 views106 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ура, вот и до пятницы дожили

custom 518834990979904419865custom 539084889902182498123custom 525849839946383183114custom 52809033197017209242custom 52628437252513849041custom 52628958189097195811

27 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC805 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня рекомендация канала Стратегии для странных 🌚 О маркетинге от ведьмы - для ведьм, помогающих практиков, историков, авторов, специалистов странных ниш, эстетиков и всех, кто хочет подружить свою индивидуальность с шаблонами и правилами инфобизнеса. В блоге - фишки и пошаговые инструкции, чтобы блог работал на вас, а не вы на блог: 🌚 Как структурировать и преподнести свои знания и умения людям 🌚 О чем писать,…

custom 538910282731227973025custom 525849839946383183111custom 52809033197017209247custom 51883499097990441985

27 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC909 views93 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

С вами снова рубрика #настинабиблиотека 🖤 Последнее время читала книги, которые не совсем относятся к тематике Ведьм. Исправляюсь и начинаю наконец оправдывать описание канала: Эстетика женских архетипов. Мистика, фетиш, кино, ведьмы. Изучаю феномен Ведьм и темы потустороннего в истории кино, литературы, модной индустрии, психологии и фольклора. Описание от издательства: Перед вами сборник увлекательных и вместе с т…

custom 538910282731227973054custom 528090331970172092420custom 526284372525138490410custom 53908488990218249816custom 52628958189097195812custom 53078137336475342431

24 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC837 views261 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Я что много прошу?

custom 5390848899021824981138custom 525849839946383183170custom 530781373364753424347custom 53891028273122797305custom 51883499097990441981

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @personal_witches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @personal_witches as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
46 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

С любовью от Фелиции
@feliciamalets · 22,448
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
пальцы в чернилах.
@fetissia · 19,751
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Personal Witches” (@personal_witches), 7,786 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/personal_witches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.