Будьте осторожны!
Signed Veronica Kozyreva

Channel
@petnutrition
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,353subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001765781535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petnutrition |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petnutrition |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 9,353 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 9,352 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 9,346 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:54 | 9,351 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 9,353 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 9,351 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:59 | 9,355 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 9,350 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 9,361 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 9,365 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 9,366 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 9,367 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,319 reactions across 22 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1,259 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 1,220 | 28.2% | |
| 🔥 | 616 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 333 | 7.71% | |
| 🎉 | 252 | 5.83% | |
| 🥰 | 180 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 172 | 3.98% | |
| custom 5256041592271157291 | 113 | 2.62% | |
| 😢 | 64 | 1.48% | |
| 🤯 | 47 | 1.09% | |
| 🤩 | 20 | 0.463% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 0.44% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 0.301% | |
| custom 5413492778355140447 | 11 | 0.255% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,319 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petnutrition. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Будьте осторожны!
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
⚡️В России отзывают партию вакцины для собак после сообщений о гибели животных, — СМИ. «Ветбиохим» приостановит обращение серии №20 вакцины «Мультикан-8» и отправит образцы на независимую экспертизу. «Причины произошедшего устанавливаются. Сам по себе факт вакцинации животных не является достаточным основанием для установления причинно-следственной связи между применением вакцины и случаями гибели. Такая связь либо…
😱69😢27❤10
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Деревенские истории))) Ну вот и добыча! *когда соседская кошка ходит в гости не просто так*
❤63🔥26🥰11😢10custom 52560415922711572916👏1
Signed Юлия
Дачные истории)) Покормили кота (съел три куриные головы!), и кот пропал. Звали, везде рядом смотрели - всё, нет кота. А потом я внезапно его нашла. 😂
😁219🥰38🔥25👍4🤩2
Signed Юлия
Подписчица переслала видео. Очередная пугалка про натуральный рацион и мясо. Проблема с такими видео в том, что рацион как правило собран с большим количеством грубых ошибок. В данном случае в рационе не было ни печени (выскочил дефицит витамина А), ни костей (еще аукнется дефицит минералов). Имеем поломанного кота. Кто виноват? Мясо и натуральное питание. В итоге кот переведен на пром.корм вместо того чтобы натураль…
❤117🤯17😢14🤔3
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Ну и ещё одно фото, с паутиной из потрошков))) Вероника вспомнила, что нас когда-то называли кормильцами куриными потрохами. Беспокоит ли это нас сейчас? Нет! P.S. у меня единственный комплекс чистоты пола, но тут самый разгар ужина, в этот момент кошкам можно всё. Даже паутину из кишочков плести 😂 Полы потом вымою))
🔥107😁48custom 525604159227115729126❤15
Signed Юлия
Редкое угощение,кишечник индейки Если что, с другой стороны кто-то его тоже жуёт 😂😂😂😂
😁100🔥19❤7🥰7🤔6
Signed Юлия
Купила контейнеры, чтобы сложить для переезда вещи, из которых выросла дочь. Но не углядела, что крышки надо было заказать отдельно. Поставила их так порожними в коридоре, но не прошло и десяти минут, как слышу, кто-то сладко сопит. У котика наконец-то появилось место, где можно полежать, представляете? До это приходилось ютиться на хозяйской кровати, на диване, в старом протертом гамаке на двери, в какой-то собачьей…
😁260❤112🥰44🔥8👏4
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Photo, posted without a caption
😁210🥰47❤30🔥8
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Когда-то меня до глубины души задел тест на хороший интерьер в квартире и плохой от одного блогера: Откиньтесь в удобном кресле, внимательно посмотрите на комнату перед вами, а затем попытайтесь представить в интерьере кошачий домик — абсолютно любой. Розовый, деревянный, двухэтажный — границ не существует. Представили? Если этот домик смотрится органично, с интерьером явно что-то не так. Если же его хочется немедлен…
😁79❤22👍7custom 54134927783551404473🤔2
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Вероника, с днём рождения! Здоровья, счастья, удачи и процветания! Желаю зажигать огни и достигать новых вершин! Поздравляю тебя от лица всех читателей канала @catnutrition и сказать, что мы все очень тебя любим и от всего сердца желаем всего самого-самого лучшего! Пусть твои мечты сбудутся! P S. У манула Тимофея пришлось отобрать букет цветов для тебя! :)
🎉198❤53🔥11🤩2🥰2
Signed Юлия
В итоге взяли для собаки Шабли первую позицию - говядина с перепелиным яйцом
👍85🔥64🥰15❤5
Signed Veronica Kozyreva
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @petnutrition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А ваша кошка кто?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@petnutrition named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Catnutrition.ru” (@petnutrition), 9,353 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petnutrition.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.