Posted without readable text
🔥9❤3custom 52581971246878776413custom 52378299559785473222💩1

Channel
@petrov_seva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,169subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001421573940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @petrov_seva |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/petrov_seva |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 3,169 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 3,175 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 3,174 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 3,177 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 3,169 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 3,171 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 3,174 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 3,173 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 3,176 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 3,178 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 3,180 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 3,179 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 3,179 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
613 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 218 | 35.6% | |
| ❤ | 160 | 26.1% | |
| 😁 | 113 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5237829955978547322 | 39 | 6.36% | |
| custom 5258197124687877641 | 36 | 5.87% | |
| 💩 | 24 | 3.92% | |
| 🕊 | 16 | 2.61% | |
| custom 5370796371026648154 | 4 | 0.653% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.489% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 613 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petrov_seva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
🔥9❤3custom 52581971246878776413custom 52378299559785473222💩1
🎙 Вебинар «Как получать меньше правок и больше повторных продаж» Как дизайнеру выстроить процесс работы над проектом таким образом, чтобы клиенты доверяли и возвращались снова — узнаете на бесплатном вебинаре 30 июля. 👉 Запишитесь, чтобы получить ссылку перед началом: https://t.me/TildaEventsBot?start=dl-17830762692121b640f9e5 На вебинаре разберём: 🟠Почему клиент начинает тревожиться, приносить десятки правок и ка…
🔥11❤4💩2custom 52581971246878776412
Это просто имба!
custom 523782995597854732218🔥13❤2💩2
Взяли в команду в офис джуна, зовут Петя! Знакомьтесь ✨ Пока на испытательном сроке, но ему очень понравился наш диван. Думаем, что останется 🩶 PS: А если серьезно, спасибо Пете и Косте, что заехали в гости ✨ Ждём вас снова в сентябре!
😁39❤22🔥10💩3custom 52378299559785473223
🎉 Tilda Template Fest 2026 Залетайте в конкурс для дизайнеров! Создайте авторский проект и попадите в библиотеку шаблонов на Тильде. Все подробности тут 👉 https://video.tilda.ru/template-fest-2026 🟠 Кто может принять участие? Дизайнеры, фрилансеры и просто энтузиасты 🟠 Что нужно делать? 24 июня в 09:00 на странице конкурса появится задание, которое нужно будет выполнить и прислать до 8 июля 23:59 🟠 Когда будут р…
🔥6custom 52581971246878776412❤1👌1💩1
В Ростове-на-Дону опять будет движ. Всем быть ✨
🔥11❤7🕊4💩2
Моим друзьям из НОЛИМ исполнилось 5 лет! Как же быстро растут чужие продукты 😐 Пообещал Сане, что поздравлю их на своём канале и конечно не могу этого не сделать, так как все эти годы ребята снабжают нас полным доступом ко всем модам! От чего проекты выглядять оригинальнее и свежее. Кстати, зайти и поздравить ребят вы тоже можете вот тут там какая-то лютая лудка с раздачей ништяков. Я попробовал, но мне не фартанул…
❤14😁11💩7custom 52581971246878776414🕊2
Маководы, держите интересный сайтец 😏 Пару утилиток оттуда подрезал себе. Ну там еще много чего есть по теме Mac: от литературы до хардвера. https://macfolio.com/
🔥13❤8🕊2custom 52378299559785473222
Гляньте что нашел! Есть такой граф дизайнер и иллюстратор Никита Василевский. Он делает прикольные онлайн сервисы, причем вижу, что все бесплатные (платных пока не нашел) Вот ссылка на его сайт, где все собрано https://nikitavasilevskiy.com А вот сервис со скринкаста к посту https://nikitavasilevskiy.com/Inflation А еще залип на странице 600 сторис — https://nikitavasilevskiy.com/600-stories Никита! Я тебя не зн…
🔥36❤13🕊7👌2custom 52581971246878776412
Классный сайтик. Я залип! В нем собрали потрясающий каталог предметного дизайна. Может провалиться в карточку и почитать о каждом произведении искусства подробнее. Забираем на рефы! archiveofobjects.net
❤25🔥12🕊1custom 52581971246878776411
На Дизайнерс вышел пост со мной для их рубрики ритуалы и это не первоапрельская шутка! Заходим > читаем > комментируем 🕺
❤9💩6🔥4custom 52581971246878776412
Студия №1 Недавно мне попалась новость, которую обсуждал Артемий (кусочек видео прикрепил) и это меня наталкнуло на мысль, что некоторые студии, ничем не отличаются от шаурмичных, который хотят быть первыми в какой-то своей воображаемой системе координат 😳 Поэтому если вы пишите: Мы студия/агенство №1, то это выглядит со стороны, как кринж! У меня все 🏃♀️
😁25custom 52378299559785473228custom 53707963710266481542🔥1custom 52581971246878776411
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @petrov_seva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сева вещает” (@petrov_seva), 3,169 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrov_seva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.