Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ¡Phanny Kay!

Channel

¡Phanny Kay!

@phannykay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

440subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329818409
TypeChannel
Username@phannykay
Created17 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/phannykay

Growth

432445438.56 August 2026 — 432 subscribers6 August 2026 — 432 subscribers15 August 2026 — 438 subscribers22 August 2026 — 445 subscribers7 September 2026 — 440 subscribers4406 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 430–447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:15440-5
22 Aug 2026, 16:36445+7
15 Aug 2026, 16:46438+6
6 Aug 2026, 19:19432no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:06432first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋3152.5%
🥰1423.7%
💘813.6%
😭610.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @owl_does_artPhoto

Oh no there's a cockroach on the wall! #pmr_ruby #mystic_reality

🥰2

Signed Phanny Kay

5 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @owl_does_artVideo

Voiced version on YouTube https://youtube.com/shorts/bt-9RTbQ-B0?si=Il6uPuo1u27htSVU Check it out #animation

😭2💋1

Signed Phanny Kay

5 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Why are their expressions so uncomfortable...

😭3

Signed Phanny Kay

5 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC60 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

And Sadie! #art #doodles

💋8

Signed Phanny Kay

5 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC61 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Amethyst ◇ #art #doodles

💋7💘2

Signed Phanny Kay

4 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC784 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

I think I can officially say that this exercise is done. I know it's far from perfect, but I have spent far too much time on it, and I just want this to be over with. Also, since I deleted some of the frames, I had to add them back using a video editor, therefore, I can no longer edit this in the original program without the video quality dropping. However, I did learn so many little things that, if I had not done th

💋8💘6🥰2😭1

Signed Phanny Kay

4 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC91 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fedardiletantPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Phanny Kay

4 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC90 viewsread 6 August 2026

سلام وقتتون به خیر🌟🧚‍♀️ ممکنه لطفا این پست رو بفرستید داخل چنلتون؟ خیلی گناه داره https://t.me/pishoo_amirkabir/1176

Signed Phanny Kay

3 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC95 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @blackocean00art767Photo

یکی از مدلسازی های قدیمیم

Signed Phanny Kay

3 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC92 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @blackocean00art767Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Phanny Kay

3 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @blackocean00art767Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Phanny Kay

2 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SteveSnowSPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💋3

Signed Phanny Kay

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @phannykay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“¡Phanny Kay!” (@phannykay), 440 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phannykay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.