Channel
@philosophycf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
620subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002033447430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @philosophycf |
| Created | 22 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/philosophycf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 620 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 621 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 622 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 624 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 627 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 629 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 629 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 36.4% | |
| 🤗 | 9 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 15.9% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я сам изобрёл одну мысль Сократа, только по-своему. "Я знаю, что ничего не знаю, а другие не знают и этого" Это та фундаментальная истина к которой я пришел анализируя мышление множества челов, своё и в чём разница в тех или иных моментах, почему в некоторых моментах челы приходят к неверным или недоказуемым выводам, и почему тоже самое происходит со мной. Как и всегда у подобных истин есть проблема, ведь эту фразу…
Signed Ихтис 彡 L.
Каких максимально неизвестных философов вы знаете? Не какие-то там Чораны, а именно невиданные? Я начну: Казимир Малевич(именно как философ). Я нигде не видел чтоб о его философии говорили, лишь искусство и искусство #тейк@philosophycf
❤1
Signed Ихтис 彡 L.
Посоветуйте книги про философию национал-социализма третьего рейха. Хайдеггер не в счёт, от него уже есть подобное #тейк@philosophycf
Signed Ихтис 彡 L.
Читаю делеза. Ебет мозги не хуже гегеля иди нахуй #тейк@philosophycf
❤1
Signed ихтис 彡 L.
Чиикива в виде философов тгк - @agapekeng Неанон кенгуру тайлериха #тейк@philosophycf
❤6
Signed ихтис 彡 L.
друзья всем привет !!!!!!!! пройдите мой опрос пожалуйста мне для статьи!!!!!!! кидайте друзьям и всем всем всем!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! у меня исследование!!! спасибо!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://forms.yandex.ru/cloud/6a4ba45002848f06a3b82c8d
Signed ихтис 彡 L.
Глупенький ницше тгк - @agapekeng Неанон кенгуру тайлериха #тейк@philosophycf
🤗6
Signed ихтис 彡 L.
Действительно ли Мы — все, что у нас есть? В какой-то период своей жизни в детстве я сама для себя открыла рационалистскую философию Декарта. Это было порождено типичным подростковым нигилизмом, когда ты начинаешь отрицать то, что для тебя было названо ценностью, а также переосознаешь, что у тебя на самом деле есть и откуда это взялось. Так я пришла к выводу, что человек никогда не знает точно, что существует вокру…
❤2🍓2🖕2
Signed ихтис 彡 L.
влд ваш наглядно
Signed ихтис 彡 (meowч)
если кто-то еще вдруг сомневался в том, что я философ, то держу в курсе: у меня имеются умные книжки, голая тянка на обоях, «собственно говоря» в обороте, и, конечно же, я знаю два закона диалектической логики следовательно, сомневаться у вас просто нет никакой возможности
❤4🍓1
Signed ихтис 彡 (meowч)
Наконец-то заполучил хотя-бы репринт данного труда. Давно ждал поступления, почти год как. Только вот не знаю, когда читать начну. Что-то мозг отсох думать... #тейк@philosophycf
🔥1
Signed ихтис 彡 (meowч)
можно ли считать Теда из ''У меня нет рта, и я должен кричать'' человеком, который живет по философии абсурдизма Камю? #тейк@philosophycf
Signed ихтис 彡 (meowч)
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @philosophycf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“философское кафе” (@philosophycf), 620 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philosophycf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.