Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net -125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 4,646β4,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 20:18
4,665
-25
12 Sept 2026, 03:19
4,690
-13
7 Sept 2026, 12:01
4,703
-19
2 Sept 2026, 13:33
4,722
-9
30 Aug 2026, 22:57
4,731
-9
28 Aug 2026, 06:24
4,740
-5
25 Aug 2026, 07:42
4,745
-12
22 Aug 2026, 11:43
4,757
-15
19 Aug 2026, 11:28
4,772
-8
16 Aug 2026, 18:38
4,780
-10
13 Aug 2026, 13:08
4,790
no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:31
4,790
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
How was your CPI experience? Did during the news ?
Hell na π45%
I jumped in and ran out immediately21%
They scattered my account42%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The TX3 Competition is STILL ON π₯π
How can this person be the winner already?! π
NO FUCKING WAY π Everyone needs to jump into this competition NOW!
Bring that cup home π and Iβll personally give you β¦1,000,000 CASH on top of your competition prize. π°π₯
Donβt watch from the sidelines. ENTER. COMPETE. WIN.
Letβs goooo! ππ₯
https://crm.tx3markets.com/register?referral=019f381f-040d-716e-b043-0523739edeaa
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @phoenixcap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How was your CPI experience? Did during the news ?
Hell na π45%
I jumped in and ran out immediately21%
They scattered my account42%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
SERENDIPITY || TRADES πππ- DR ELVIS @serendipitytradeacademy Β· 133,679 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here β alongside 91 others β read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππππ πππππ πππππππβ (@phoenixcap), 4,665 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phoenixcap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.