Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net +1,007. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,982–4,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:56
4,244
+55
12 Sept 2026, 06:55
4,189
+36
8 Sept 2026, 08:35
4,153
+211
3 Sept 2026, 06:17
3,942
+97
30 Aug 2026, 20:36
3,845
+246
28 Aug 2026, 06:54
3,599
+103
25 Aug 2026, 02:49
3,496
+349
21 Aug 2026, 18:08
3,147
-1
18 Aug 2026, 23:15
3,148
-19
16 Aug 2026, 06:18
3,167
-53
12 Aug 2026, 22:26
3,220
-17
12 Aug 2026, 00:30
3,237
no change
12 Aug 2026, 00:17
3,237
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
20m 13s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
639 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
528
82.6%
❤🔥
53
8.29%
💔
19
2.97%
💯
17
2.66%
🔥
12
1.88%
🙏
8
1.25%
👻
1
0.156%
🕊
1
0.156%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 639 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▶️خب نتایج آزمون تیزهوشان اومد
امسال سال عجیبی بود ،پر از فراز و نشیب!😞
چقدر سختی کشیدید
جدا از نتیجه، تلاشتون برام کلی ارزشمند بوده و هست
شماها تو سختترین شرایط تلاش کردید ❤️
کارنامه قبولیتون
اسمتون
شهرتون
رو تو دایرکت همین کانال برم بفرستید🙏🌹
#فیزیک_دهم
👍شبیهساز آزمون ۱۶ مرداد
⌛در پرتاب توپ بسکتبال میتونیم از چرخش توپ و تغییر نیروی گرانش صرف نظر کنیم
⌛در ۹۹ درصد موارد خود خود نیروی وزن مهمه!!!
#فیزیک_دهم
👍شبیهساز آزمون ۱۶ مرداد
⌛نیروی مقاومت هوا خلاف جهت حرکت حسم است
⌛در ۹۹ درصد موارد نمیتونیم از خود نیروی وزن صرف نظر کنیم و خود نیروی وزن مهمه!
اما تغییرات نیروی وزن جای بحث داره مه تو کلاسها گفتم😉
#فیزیک_دهم
👍شبیهساز آزمون ۱۶ مرداد
⌛فیزیک علمی تجربی است
⌛آزمونپذیری و اصلاح نظریههای فیزیکی نقطه قوت دانش فیزیک هست
💯16❤7
Signed Mohammad Baghban
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @physics_baghban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال رسمی ماز @biomaze_VIp · 22,348 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
دکترپوریاخیراندیش @Drkheyrandish_bio · 36,090 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
انگلیسی به سبک استاد قیومی @alighayoomi_teacher · 97,607 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
ادبیات فارسی با دکتر علیرضا جعفری @adabiat_drjaafari · 127,692 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیزیک باغبان” (@physics_baghban), 4,244 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physics_baghban.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.