Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for physicsbyfiziks@official

Channel

physicsbyfiziks@official

@physicsbyfiziks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,762subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001290781301
TypeChannel
Username@physicsbyfiziks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/physicsbyfiziks

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,76110,81510,7887 August 2026 — 10,815 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,815 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,810 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,799 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,798 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,799 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,788 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,786 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,797 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,793 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,786 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,789 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,783 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,783 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,779 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,776 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,784 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,785 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,777 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,766 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,762 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,761 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,765 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,762 subscribers10,7627 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,753–10,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:5610,762-3
16 Sept 2026, 23:1510,765+4
14 Sept 2026, 21:4110,761-1
13 Sept 2026, 08:0110,762-4
11 Sept 2026, 13:3910,766-11
8 Sept 2026, 23:3610,777-8
5 Sept 2026, 16:5610,785+1
3 Sept 2026, 13:5710,784+8
2 Sept 2026, 05:1610,776-3
1 Sept 2026, 04:3410,779-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:5410,783-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:4310,784+1
28 Aug 2026, 05:4510,783-6
27 Aug 2026, 02:5710,789+3
26 Aug 2026, 02:5410,786-7
25 Aug 2026, 01:1410,793-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:5710,797+2
22 Aug 2026, 01:5810,795+2
20 Aug 2026, 18:1510,793-2
19 Aug 2026, 18:4510,795first reading

Engagement

129 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.44%
avg views ÷ 10,762 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
48
of 129 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held129 (4 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total12,618
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC125 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Achievements of fiziks in CSIR-NET/JRF Physical Science December 2022 examination. Learn Physics in Right Way Call us @9871145498, 9560523636, 8787251698

1 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC131 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#Nuclear and Particle Physics#Question with Solutions # CSIR/NET-JRF JUNE-2024 #Physicsbyfiziks #Physicalscience#Learn_Physics_in_Right_Way https://www.physicsbyfiziks.com/

1 Sept 2026, 09:31 UTC172 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Join Best Online Live classes for IIT-JAM, JEST, TIFR and CUET (PG) Batch Starting From 07th September. Register now @9871145498, 9560523636, 8787251698 Learn Physics in Right Way

1 Sept 2026, 02:57 UTC230 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Test Your fiziks Concepts. CSIR NET -JRF, IIT-JAM, GATE, JEST, TIFR, PGT Physics. Learn Physics in Right Way.

31 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC260 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#Solid State Physics#Question with Solutions # CSIR/NET-JRF JUNE-2024 #Physicsbyfiziks #Physicalscience#Learn_Physics_in_Right_Way https://www.physicsbyfiziks.com/

31 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC261 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Join Best Online Live classes for CSIR-NET/JRF, GATE, JEST and TIFR. Batch Starting From 7th September. Book your seat @9871145498, 9560523636, 8787251698 Learn Physics in Right Way

31 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC260 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Join Best Online Pre-recorded classes for CSIR-NET/JRF, GATE, JEST and TIFR Batch Starting From 30th August. Book your seat @9871145498, 9560523636, 8787251698 Learn Physics in Right Way

31 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC260 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Test Your fiziks Concepts. CSIR NET -JRF, IIT-JAM, GATE, JEST, TIFR, PGT Physics. Learn Physics in Right Way

30 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC341 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Join Best Online Pre-recorded classes for CSIR-NET/JRF, GATE, JEST and TIFR Batch Starting From 30th August. Book your seat @9871145498, 9560523636, 8787251698 Learn Physics in Right Way

Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @physicsbyfiziks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SCIENCE QUIZ 🧬🧪⚗️
@science_qq · 148,486
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“physicsbyfiziks@official” (@physicsbyfiziks), 10,762 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physicsbyfiziks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.