Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pickle Cat's Den 🥒

Channel

Pickle Cat's Den 🥒

@picklecati

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,299subscribers

-246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002408369357
TypeChannel
Username@picklecati
Created9 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/picklecati

Growth

16,29916,82716,5637 August 2026 — 16,545 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,544 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,542 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,540 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,538 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,540 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,531 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,525 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,704 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,705 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,700 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,692 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,804 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,822 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,827 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,823 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,804 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,754 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,713 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,661 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,616 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,571 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,533 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,485 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,410 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,299 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 33 days, net -246. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,220–16,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 06:1916,299-111
6 Sept 2026, 02:0116,410-75
4 Sept 2026, 00:1516,485-48
2 Sept 2026, 13:2316,533-38
1 Sept 2026, 11:3616,571-45
31 Aug 2026, 14:3216,616-45
30 Aug 2026, 14:0316,661-52
29 Aug 2026, 14:3416,713-41
28 Aug 2026, 14:5416,754-50
27 Aug 2026, 11:2316,804-19
26 Aug 2026, 14:2616,823-4
25 Aug 2026, 13:4616,827+5
24 Aug 2026, 14:5716,822+18
23 Aug 2026, 02:1716,804+112
21 Aug 2026, 13:4516,692-8
19 Aug 2026, 09:5316,700-5
18 Aug 2026, 11:5216,705+1
17 Aug 2026, 12:2716,704+179
16 Aug 2026, 03:3516,525-6
14 Aug 2026, 14:2716,531first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 9 January 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 16,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,530
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held32 (9 January 202531 August 2026)
Views total49,880
Reactions total648
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,728 reactions across 28 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 619489037338333063493334.2%
66624.4%
custom 631218072044175916340614.9%
🤣2077.59%
👍1254.58%
😭1214.44%
🔥441.61%
🥰391.43%
👏291.06%
🤩220.806%
😢210.77%
❤‍🔥200.733%
😍180.66%
🎉110.403%
🤯110.403%
custom 619472269786009572290.33%
😨90.33%
🍾80.293%
🐳80.293%
🦄60.22%
5 further kinds150.55%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,728 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 28 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @picklecati. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2025 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,480 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Guys are we’re fucked???🤣 https://x.com/0xpicklecati/status/2094353117341233224

custom 619489037338333063425🤣93

30 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,230 views94 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

小群里的卡老师给大家做了点周边寄过去了,不知道咋发到时候,打算直接瞄准幸运观众砸向他🤣 哈哈哈哈 来财~来财~

55custom 619489037338333063433🔥4👍1🤪1

30 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈3,250 views35 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

过几天闪现台北来区块链周party,到时候见~ https://x.com/0xpicklecati/status/2094011105882312936

custom 6194890373383330634268🐳1

22 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈5,420 views56 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/0xpicklecati/status/2091038462610956554?s=46

custom 61948903733833306344111🔥4

22 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC≈4,900 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

猴市快乐

custom 61948903733833306343510🤣4😭2

22 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC≈4,710 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

圣诞快乐

🥰19custom 619489037338333063413🤣8🔥3😭3

22 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC≈4,130 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

猴市说曹操曹操到🤡

custom 61948903733833306343210🤯6👏4🤣1

22 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC≈4,280 views74 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

牛市了?熊市结束了?! no 是猴市 上串下跳

custom 61948903733833306344218🤣11👍3

17 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈6,520 views95 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

欢迎来到币安之城

🤣65custom 619489037338333063425🦄41

17 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC≈5,650 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

随后我们又路过了这个店 我:你看这店多可爱 朋友:这也是币安 我:。 朋友:这也是币安 我:。 朋友:是啊,都卖的盘子啊

23🤣22custom 619489037338333063410👏2custom 61947226978600957222

17 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC≈5,310 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

https://x.com/0xpicklecati/status/2089209306549797059?s=46

🤣34custom 6194890373383330634113

30 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC≈7,610 views167 reactions3 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

可能很多人天天听我讲上帝这个上帝那个的觉得很玄乎,但我确实是从18岁之前坚定的无神主义者(甚至在reddit上之前还总去神学论坛上用所谓的理智和科学去喷那些迷信的人) 但天劫无数次降临后,逼着我感觉真有个神存在了,因为感觉命运太造化弄人了,感觉一定有神,但这所谓的神一定很坏,不然如果真的有神,他怎么舍得这么折磨我。 然后开启了一个叫做“我一定要向世界证明神不存在”的道路。 但是和我有类似经历的都知道,一旦你真的很认真的努力去研究去证明上帝是不可能存在的,你研究的越深,你就越会突然有一天发现你越研究反而相信一定有个上帝,上帝一定存在 而且他并不坏,至少不是我们定义的那种坏。文字很难表达清楚但你只要走过我刚才说的那条“路”,你越不信那你就越想办法去证明他不存在,你就真的反而会发现它。而且一切发生在你生命的事情里不管好的坏的都是有非常重要的原因的,就看你能不能抓住这个机缘了

custom 619489037338333063410544😨9👏8😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @picklecati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pickle Cat's Den 🥒” (@picklecati), 16,299 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/picklecati.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.