Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for этика зловещей долины

Channel

этика зловещей долины

@pierdjo

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,292subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001404778570
TypeChannel
Username@pierdjo
Created2 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pierdjo

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Пьер Джорджо — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

4,2794,3014,2906 August 2026 — 4,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,281 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,287 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,293 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,294 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,301 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,297 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,282 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,285 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,286 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,292 subscribers4,2926 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,276–4,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 13:164,292+6
2 Sept 2026, 09:474,286+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:044,285+3
24 Aug 2026, 18:294,282-15
21 Aug 2026, 03:334,297-4
17 Aug 2026, 22:034,301+7
15 Aug 2026, 03:474,294+1
11 Aug 2026, 14:234,293+6
8 Aug 2026, 21:314,287+6
6 Aug 2026, 07:504,281+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:064,279no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:024,279first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 10 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10032.4%
💯6420.7%
😭3912.6%
🌚237.44%
🥴185.83%
🔥134.21%
❤‍🔥113.56%
😱113.56%
😢72.27%
🕊51.62%
🤩51.62%
🏆30.971%
😍30.971%
20.647%
😐20.647%
👍10.324%
🤡10.324%
🤯10.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,400 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Для того чтобы забукировать конкретную модель которую хочет бренд, бренду не нужен кастинг-директор. Я довольно спокойно отношусь к приписыванию себя в кредитах рядом с «большими именами», если бы клиент пришел ко мне с запросом на проект, я бы реализовывал проект и не стеснялся бы дать обратную связь на те или иные решения клиента. Здесь я говорю о странном для меня построении коммуникации со стороны бренда Опять

18🥴13💯42

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,150 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ibragimgatsievv

Илья, но ведь если бы ЭКОНИКА пришла к тебе с задачей сделать кастинг на Рози, ты бы не отказался, верно? Никто и никогда не откажется от кейса в виде такой большой модели в своем портфолио. Поэтому зачем задаваться подобным вопросом? Да, возможно это не вызывает вау-эффекта, так как Хантингтон буквально живет в этом образе фулл-тайм, но имя громкое и проект большой. Вселенная схлопнется, если в фешн начнут по-насто

10😢7🥴4🕊3🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈1,780 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bponlinePhoto

«Эконика» без объяснений причин удалила фотосессию с Роузи Хантингтон из своего аккаунта в запретграме.

🌚23😱94😭1

2 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈5,830 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я, если честно, так и не понял, какой позитивный медийный импакт для локального российского бренда может дать съемка с моделью, чей гонорар за подобный проект составляет минимум $100–150 тысяч (хотя вангую, что покупали дороже раза в три) и чья узнаваемость проявлена, скажем так, в других географических широтах.

💯3120😐2👍1🤡1🥴1

29 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈2,720 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне тут птички напели, что у одного очень большого и очень популярного масс-маркет бренда на складах WB сгорело продукции на 2-млрд, компенсирует затраты со стороны WB на 80-млн. Как думаете, в какой очередности клиент будет оплачивать работу моделей по прошедшим съемкам?

😭383😱2

28 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,530 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня тут в силу жизненных обстоятельств появился приемный псыночка-корзиночка, ну и после его тыгыдыков в Суздальских лугах и заплывов в Нерли было принято коллективное решение что нет-сил-больше терпеть и срочно надо бахнуть ему карэху привести все это безобразие в надлежащий вид. В общем привели его к нашим друзьям в @rommi_grooming. Ну и пацан расцвел! Мыт, чесан, ухожен и вообще гроза всех окрестных сердец. К

🔥13😍3

28 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,060 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вообще “без AI” это новое без “ГМО”

💯262

28 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,110 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы тут вообще последнее время много рассуждаем об угрозе генеративного AI для креативных индустрий в целом и модельного бизнеса в частности. Но мне кажется, угроза AI не столько в замене моделей (хотя я и убеждён в том, что на горизонте 2-3 лет масс-маркет-каталог будет генеративным на 90%), сколько в том, что бренд / креативная единица, принимающая решения, начнёт хотеть от живого человека того же, что получает от м

21🕊2

29 Jun 2026, 20:16 UTC≈2,300 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как я стал собачником

21

27 Jun 2026, 23:43 UTC≈1,580 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nn_sobaka_ruPhoto

«НН.Собака.ru» объявляет лауреатов премии «ТОП 50. Самые знаменитые люди Нижнего Новгорода» — 2026 в номинации «Мода» 🐶 Илья Вершинин, кастинг-директор 🐶 Яна Михровская, основатель и креативный директор ювелирного бренда Rassvet Detail 🐶 Анна Вьялицына, топ-модель 🐶 Ваца, художница 🐶 Ксения Кудряшова, основатель бренда BITTE_RUHE Благодарим за поддержку партнеров премии: ЖК «Идель. Квартал на Сенной», клинику э

❤‍🔥11🤩5🏆3💯31

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pierdjo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,358
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“этика зловещей долины” (@pierdjo), 4,292 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pierdjo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.