Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пылаева

Channel

Пылаева

@pilaeva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,953subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001701730028
TypeChannel
Username@pilaeva
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pilaeva

Growth

9,95310,0459,9997 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,042 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,011 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,999 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,984 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,973 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,979 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,977 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,976 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,965 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,953 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 27 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,939–10,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:379,953-12
31 Aug 2026, 03:469,965-11
28 Aug 2026, 10:379,976-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:239,977-2
22 Aug 2026, 17:479,979+6
19 Aug 2026, 11:089,973-11
16 Aug 2026, 18:359,984-15
13 Aug 2026, 08:269,999-3
12 Aug 2026, 05:5510,002-9
11 Aug 2026, 03:5210,011-7
10 Aug 2026, 02:5210,018-11
9 Aug 2026, 03:5410,029-13
8 Aug 2026, 04:5210,042-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:3010,045no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:2410,045first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 9,953 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,860
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held33 (29 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total57,120
Reactions total3,703
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,982 reactions across 33 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,96549.6%
🤣64410.8%
😁64010.7%
🔥5939.91%
❤‍🔥1622.71%
🥰1232.06%
🙏951.59%
💔941.57%
💯891.49%
😍861.44%
🍓771.29%
💅430.719%
👏410.685%
😭380.635%
🦄380.635%
👍350.585%
😱350.585%
🥴170.284%
🤔150.251%
🍾130.217%
24 further kinds1392.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,982 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
222
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 33 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pilaeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,550 views383 reactions81 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пляжные фотосессии - это моё. 💅

241🔥73🥰30😁22🤗4🦄4👏3💅3

18 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC≈3,910 views236 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Улетаю. Почти как Довлатов, только на море и на 5 дней. Инстаграм злит звоей тупостью (точнее, происходящее в нем), рейс задерживается на два часа - вот и обстоятельства, которые привели в ларек «печать» ) Неожиданно книг набрала. Так давно все мои книги в телефоне и вот.. Буду романтично фоткать лежак, ноги в масле и умное. Литературу выбрала с легеньким названием сразу, такой романтики захотелось, тем более, что он

169🔥34🙏12😁7💯4🥰4❤‍🔥3👍2

17 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈3,290 views407 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @lizok_yushchukPhoto

Мы с подругой считаем, что нас все хотят! Также мы:

🔥209🤣12230😁21😍12🍓5💅3👀2

17 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC≈3,600 views143 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Гомерически

😁93🤣348🔥4😭3🥰1

16 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈3,590 views337 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Миллениальский прайм

😁152🤣6748🔥21💅19❤‍🔥16🍾4🍌3

15 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈3,620 views184 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

Чистила подписки в иг. Как это долго, нудно и даже чуть-чуть грустно. От кого-то не можешь отписаться годами, потому что неудобно. От кого-то отписываешься с облегчением, обнаруживая, что от тебя тоже отписались. А от кого-то с облегчением, но потом догоняет «ах ты сука, не подписана на меня, значит..» Короче, глупость абсолютная, но эмоции все равно вызывает) Много прошлого, ты понимаешь, что оно уже прошлое, но все

124🤣25💯15😁7👍5👏4💩2🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈3,830 views125 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

Смотрю на эти фото и все острее чувство утраченного лета… Паша Осовцов Х журнал «Москвичка» (который я обожаю). Поговорили о мужчинах в номере августа. А что толку… все равно их так сложно понять)

🍓6330🥰17😍7😁4🔥2🦄1😎1

13 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈2,180 views162 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Ну чего… довольны?? Все, кто канючил, что им жарко

😁10924🎉10👍7💔6🤣4💯2

12 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,560 views232 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

…ну вот… как будто не женщина я длинных волос. Старалась, растила. Еще правда не не дорастила до желаемой длины, но тем не менее. Доснимусь, где снимаюсь, и вернусь. К концу года буду короткострижкой 💅🐰💅

148😭35🔥18💔10💅6🥰6🦄4👍2

12 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈2,470 views182 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вчера посмотрела «Питер FM». Удивительно, но я не смотрела это кино. Хотя что удивительно… я не смотрела многое. А может, я не смотрела, потому что оно было сильно модным? Неважно. Мне так понравилось) Как поразительно оно передает время) которое только наше) с этой музыкой, городом и глупой одеждой.. И какой красивый там Цыганов, мамочки… и правильно, что я не смотрела его тогда, иначе влюбилась бы. И девочки красив

123💯30💔18❤‍🔥9🤗1😱1

12 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈2,290 views95 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhabquaPhoto

Шутки шутками, а фильмография растет. Собрали будущие проекты с комиками и другими знакомыми артистами. Какая премьера сразу отправляется в ваш список ожидания? ЖАБА в Telegram | в VK | в MAX 🤩

62🔥20🙏5🦄3👏2💩1😁1😍1

11 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,890 views196 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @metchtvPhoto

Маленькие девочки, большая сила! @metchtv

141😍29👍10🔥8🦄5🤗3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @pilaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTCAnonymous Poll854 voters

Смотрели ли вы «Одиссею»?

  1. Да, это великое13%
  2. Да, это средне7%
  3. Да, это параша6%
  4. Нет, не смотрел(-а)74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пылаева” (@pilaeva), 9,953 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pilaeva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.