Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БОИ UFC | ПРЯМЫЕ ТРАНСЛЯЦИИ | НОВОСТИ

Channel

БОИ UFC | ПРЯМЫЕ ТРАНСЛЯЦИИ | НОВОСТИ

@pinchershow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

13,178subscribers

+338 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312455496
TypeChannel
Username@pinchershow
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pinchershow

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,59913,88813,243.57 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,840 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,831 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,834 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,806 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,789 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,773 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,762 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,095 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,981 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,956 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,932 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,913 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,893 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,880 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,836 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,826 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,822 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,807 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,813 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,868 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,854 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,810 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,805 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,777 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,961 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,816 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,772 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,777 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,767 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,776 subscribers24 September 2026 — 12,781 subscribers3 October 2026 — 12,697 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,678 subscribers12 October 2026 — 12,644 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,640 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,632 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,620 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,614 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,628 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,617 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,610 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,599 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,607 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,639 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,888 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,454 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,369 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,334 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,289 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,268 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,250 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,223 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,209 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,198 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,186 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,178 subscribers13,1787 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +338. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,406–14,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 20:2713,178-8
3 Nov 2026, 19:3913,186-12
2 Nov 2026, 19:1913,198-11
1 Nov 2026, 19:3113,209-14
31 Oct 2026, 21:2013,223-27
30 Oct 2026, 22:2013,250-18
29 Oct 2026, 21:4613,268-21
29 Oct 2026, 00:0613,289-45
27 Oct 2026, 19:3813,334-35
26 Oct 2026, 19:4013,369-85
25 Oct 2026, 19:4913,454-434
24 Oct 2026, 20:5413,888+1,249
23 Oct 2026, 22:2512,639+32
23 Oct 2026, 00:1712,607+8
21 Oct 2026, 22:5512,599-11
20 Oct 2026, 21:2612,610-7
19 Oct 2026, 18:4612,617-11
18 Oct 2026, 15:4812,628+14
17 Oct 2026, 17:0912,614-6
16 Oct 2026, 14:4612,620first reading

Engagement

124 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.90%
avg views ÷ 13,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
645
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 124 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held124 (2 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total13,552
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

650 reactions across 120 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥35354.3%
❤17126.3%
😁385.85%
👍284.31%
😢274.15%
👏192.92%
🤔81.23%
🗿60.923%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 650 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC293 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Карлос Пратес: «Махачев струсил. Это взбесило UFC. Ты должен драться, если у тебя нет травмы» «Махачев струсил. Я вернусь и побью его в два раза жестче, чем планировал, чтобы он усвоил урок и перестал быть таким трусом. В UFC взбесились – им это не понравилось. Если у тебя нет серьезной травмы и проблем со здоровьем, то дерись. Это твоя работа, у тебя есть контракт. Если не хочешь драться – освободи пояс. Но вмест…

❤1🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC527 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Рефери Джон Маккарти – про гонорары в UFC: «Больше всего я заработал на турнире в Нью-Йорке – $2 тысячи» «За все бои, которые я обслуживал в UFC, самый большой гонорар был в Нью-Йорке в 2017 году. За тот вечер я заработал $2 тысячи. Ставки стали огромной частью этого спорта. Даже когда рефери все делает правильно, его все равно обвиняют в коррупции, оскорбляют, угрожают смертью. Всему есть предел. Когда ты получае…

🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC539 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🗣Шон О’Мэлли: «Петр Ян – маленький воин, но у меня есть навыки для победы над ним» «Петр – воин. Спокойный, хладнокровный маленький воин, которого будет очень трудно победить, но мой стиль позволяет его одолеть. У меня есть необходимые навыки. Мне просто нужно быть готовым к борьбе. Перед первым боем с Петром у меня был отличный тренировочный лагерь. Я подошел к поединку здоровым. Это был мой первый бой с кем-либо …

❤2🔥2😁1

3 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC659 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Том Нолан выразил заинтересованность в схватке с Гамротом «Если выбирать себе соперника, то я хотел бы встретиться с Матеушем Гамротом. На мой взгляд, у него очень интересный стиль», — сказал спортсмен.

🔥4❤2

3 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC677 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🤔 Джейкоб Смит уже распланировал свой путь к титулу чемпиона UFC 30-летний Джейкоб Смит (14-0) — один из наиболее интересных фрешменов в UFC сегодня. «Я хотел продолжить серию досрочных побед, но в бою всякое дерьмо случается, и оно может выбить тебя из колеи. Мне кажется, я справился достойно. Никаких оправданий — я считаю, что отработал на должном уровне. Если бы все зависело от меня, я бы притащил Кевина Холлан…

❤5

3 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC623 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🗣Колби Ковингтон назвал условие для своего возвращения в MMA «Конечно, если предложат именитого соперника, громкий бой — я в деле. Ради больших денег и больших боев я готов вернуться. Но возвращаться ради того, чтобы драться с кем попало, я не вижу смысла», — сказал спортсмен.

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @pinchershow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 28 posts on @pinchershow as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БОИ UFC | ПРЯМЫЕ ТРАНСЛЯЦИИ | НОВОСТИ” (@pinchershow), 13,178 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinchershow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.