Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pink park🛹

Channel

Pink park🛹

@pinkparkpink

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,353subscribers

-129 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002059062054
TypeChannel
Username@pinkparkpink
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pinkparkpink

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,3535,4825,417.526 August 2026 — 5,482 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,477 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,477 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,474 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,464 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,459 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,455 subscribers30 September 2026 — 5,435 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,424 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,420 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,416 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,407 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,396 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,379 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,372 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,362 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,353 subscribers26 August 20262 November 2026
17 measurements spanning 68 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,334–5,501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 17:565,353-9
30 Oct 2026, 16:595,362-10
28 Oct 2026, 02:505,372-7
25 Oct 2026, 08:465,379-17
22 Oct 2026, 06:065,396-11
18 Oct 2026, 13:555,407-9
15 Oct 2026, 11:055,416-4
12 Oct 2026, 20:505,420-4
6 Oct 2026, 17:005,424-11
30 Sept 2026, 01:365,435-20
16 Sept 2026, 03:555,455-4
12 Sept 2026, 01:595,459-5
7 Sept 2026, 16:365,464-10
2 Sept 2026, 08:435,474-3
30 Aug 2026, 22:525,477no change
30 Aug 2026, 03:445,477-5
26 Aug 2026, 09:455,482first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Samaerialyoga
@samaerialyoga · 23,714
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Dreaming
@Dreaminng · 47,618
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pink park🛹” (@pinkparkpink), 5,353 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinkparkpink.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.