Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for пидераст228

Channel

пидераст228

@pipidast229

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001799529481
TypeChannel
Username@pipidast229
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pipidast229

Growth

6066639 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers16 August 2026 — 64 subscribers24 August 2026 — 62 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60 subscribers9 August 20261 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 23 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 11:0360-2
24 Aug 2026, 10:5462-2
16 Aug 2026, 19:3564-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:5265-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:0166no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:0066first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54341383983842004341933.3%
custom 53483721234359350771729.8%
custom 54630562628643350991017.5%
custom 5445157012428055800610.5%
custom 529861523225446040935.26%
custom 531704759121137948411.75%
custom 533050520980844079011.75%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026

не хочу работать потому что там надо работать

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

8 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

типо он дрочит правой смотрит на порезы и такой ммммм

custom 53483721234359350773

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

7 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

привет, а ты лесбиянка?

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

так много фоток, но они все уебищные ужас #НЕОРГИЯ

custom 54451570124280558003custom 53483721234359350772custom 54341383983842004341custom 54630562628643350991

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

1 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

вода с сосисок на пол

custom 53170475912113794841

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

1 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

мне было очень грустно и я всех ненавидела

custom 52986152322544604091custom 54341383983842004341

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

1 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ООО "тмыв репутации Евы"

custom 53483721234359350772

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

1 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 54341383983842004343custom 54630562628643350992custom 53483721234359350771

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

31 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 53483721234359350771custom 54341383983842004341custom 54630562628643350991

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

31 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я тебе руки поотрываю

custom 54341383983842004342

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

31 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Официантка ясмина хорошая, ставлю лосяру👍👍👍 а повар Ева нет, она нам не плюнула в еду, не ставлю лосяру👎👎👎👎

custom 54341383983842004343custom 54630562628643350991

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

31 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ламер (Lamer) - жаргонное словечко, используемое не обремененными интеллектом юзерами ( см.) для обозначения неопытнего пользователя.

custom 52986152322544604091custom 53305052098084407901custom 54341383983842004341custom 54630562628643350991

Signed ☨₊𝙷𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚛𝚢✃

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pipidast229. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“пидераст228” (@pipidast229), 60 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pipidast229.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.