Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +799. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,425–14,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:15
14,361
+38
15 Sept 2026, 20:41
14,323
-5
14 Sept 2026, 02:40
14,328
+4
12 Sept 2026, 07:59
14,324
+86
10 Sept 2026, 05:18
14,238
+262
6 Sept 2026, 23:22
13,976
+25
4 Sept 2026, 09:59
13,951
+16
2 Sept 2026, 22:16
13,935
+5
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
13,930
-1
1 Sept 2026, 01:45
13,931
+8
30 Aug 2026, 21:48
13,923
-4
29 Aug 2026, 21:38
13,927
-3
28 Aug 2026, 20:57
13,930
-16
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
13,946
-7
26 Aug 2026, 17:53
13,953
+3
25 Aug 2026, 20:53
13,950
-3
24 Aug 2026, 23:17
13,953
-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:54
13,954
-3
21 Aug 2026, 19:39
13,957
-6
20 Aug 2026, 13:34
13,963
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
50.0%
avg views ÷ 14,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,180
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
35 (19 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
14,360
Reactions total
509
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,116 reactions across 35 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,797
48.2%
👍
3,244
23.0%
😢
749
5.31%
😱
568
4.02%
😭
368
2.61%
💔
333
2.36%
👏
237
1.68%
👎
230
1.63%
🤔
205
1.45%
🙏
166
1.18%
😨
161
1.14%
💩
154
1.09%
🤬
125
0.886%
😁
95
0.673%
🔥
90
0.638%
🕊
80
0.567%
🤣
67
0.475%
😐
31
0.22%
💯
30
0.213%
🎉
27
0.191%
34 further kinds
359
2.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌جنگ برای بقا
در پستی در پیج اینستاگرام با عنوان جنگ برای بقا بیان کردیم ایران چاره ی برای بقا ندارد جز اینکه وارد جنگ کنترل شده شود
شاید بگوید خب مصالحه کنند و بمانند
موضوع خارج از ایدئولوژی است حکومت مرکزی می داند تسلیم و مصالحه یعنی پایان حکومت به روش نرم و به اصطلاح مخملی!!
⭕️با مصالحه به راحتی اپوزیسیون میتواند حکومت را با مردم تغییر دهند چرا که وقتی کشور امنیتی نباشد ازادی عمل مخالفین مدنی و تظاهرات و غیره ب…
📌روسیه مخالف صلح ایران است
روسیه به دنبال میانجیگری در جنگ ایران و امریکا نیست و حتی از میانجیگران به ظاهر حمایت اما در خفا مخالفت(سنگ اندازی) می کند
⭕️با جنگ و بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز ، نفت روسیه از تحریم های ثانویه خارج شده است و تمرکز امریکا از اوکراین برداشته شده و دست روسیه را برای حملات بيشتر به کیف باز گذاشته است و از طرفی امریکا را مشغول نگه داشته است
حتی روسیه با کمک اطلاعاتی به ایران خواهان باتلاق سازی جنگ…
📌سیا در مسکو
ریس اطلاعات امریکا برای گفتگو با مقامات اطلاعات روسیه وارد مسکو شد
⭕️گاهی دلیل سفر را میگویند اوکراین و گاهی انگلیس و گاهی یک کشور دیگر اروپایی که روسیه ممکن است به انجا حمله کند
⭕️همین الان روسیه در باتلاق چند ساله ی اوکراین گیر کرده است و دنبال باز کردن جبهه ی دیگر نیست
❌️برنان ، ریس وقت سازمان سیا در سال ۲۰۱۶ به مسکو سفر کرد تا بشار را کنار بگذارند جلسه به خوبی پیش رفت و روسیه خود را از جنگ سوریه…
📌پرچم سفید
ترامپ مدعی است تنها راه پایان جنگ تسلیم است
⭕️قبل از آمدن ترامپ در کاخ ریاست جمهوری بیان کردیم ترامپ به دنبال تسلیم بی قید و شرط است و شروطش در واقع پایین کشیدن پرچم جمهوری اسلامی است
پایان هستهای
پایان موشکی
پایان نیابتی
صلح با اسرائیل
و اکنون پایان سپاه
⭕️یک نکته در میان خواسته های ترامپ که تسلیم شروط ترامپ نشد و در نهایت کشته و حذف گردیدند
در سه مرحله مخالفین حذف شدند به این امید که انان که در راس ق…
📌۸۰ درصد مخالف نظام ایران
نتانیاهو در مصاحبه ای مدعی شد ۸۰ درصد از ملت ایران مخالف حکومت هستند و حکومت همچنان ۲۰ درصد طرفدار دارد که عدد زیادی است
⭕️ما به درست و غلط بودن این گزارش و آمار کاری نداریم برای ما پلن یهود در مقابله با حامیان حکومت است انکه مخالف است نیازی ضد شدن ندارد
⭕️تنها راهی که به اجماع امریکا و اسرائیل رسیده است اقتصاد است ، اقتصاد مانند استخوان در گلو می ماند بدین خاطر پس از زدن نیمی از منابع ان…
🌹با قبولی طاعات و عزاداری ها و حلول ماه ربیع الاول 🌹
⚜عمل تربیع ماه اول قمری ⚜
برای سفارش دهندگان مواکیل از بنده
🔅و آغاز ساعات سعد و فراخ 🔅
ریپلای نمایید
📌بازی اقتصادی وزیر خزانه داری امریکا
اسکات بسنت
روز اول ورود اسکات به مسند خزانه داری یک پیام در ایکس منتشر کرد
صندق را کوچک کنیم
منظورش کم کردن بدهی دولت بود که چندین گزینه را در جهان دنبال می کنند تصاحب نفت بهترین گزینه است از ونزولا تا کلمبیا و کوبا و حتی ایران
بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز به سود اقتصاد آمریکاست و حتی اگر باب المندب را هم ببندند باز سود بیشتری عاید امریکا خواهد شد انگار بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز نقشه ی بر…
📌بمب کثیف
انچه که سالها بیان داشتیم و داریم استفاده از اورانیوم در بمب کثیف است ساخت بمب اتم نیاز به تکنولوژی هست که از ان فاصله داریم
⭕️اما بمب رادیو اکتیو که سالها دم از ان می زدیم تولیدی بسیار آسانی دارد و آمریکا و اسرائیل به همین دلیل بدنبال خروج ان هستند
⭕️موضع حکومت مشخص است در صورت جنگ کثیف از بمب کثیف استفاده می کنیم این هشدار زمانی بیان میشود که حکومت با انتصاب جدید و جابجایی نیروهای نظامی در سطح کشور خود…
📌پست پیشگویی رها سازی خودرو ها
همانطور که در پست ها و استوری ها بیان کردیم ما شاهد رها سازی خودرو ها در خیابانها و کوچه ها و در منازل و پارکینگ خواهیم بود
⭕️پس از بمباران پتروشیمی و مخازن سوخت کشور و همچنین محاصره ی دریایی فشار اولیه بر مصرف سوخت خودروها در حال اجرا است
بزودی سهیمه ها قطره چکانی خواهد شد و شاهد خلوتی خیابان ها خواهید بود
⭕️اما مهمترین پلن اینده ی یهود ، بمباران بزرگترین پتروشیمی و تولید کننده ی …
📌مسلح سازی مخالفین
همانطور که در پست اخرین تظاهرات قبل از تظاهرات ۱۸ دی بیان کردم پس از اخرین تظاهرات دیگر تظاهرات مسالمتآمیز نخواهیم داشت
⭕️یکی از پلن های یهود رساندن اسلحه به مخالفین در ایران بود و توسط کردها و همچنین از طریق خوزستان و از سمت چابهار اسلحه وارد ایران شده است و در نبود ایست بازرسی و خالی بودن گلوگاه های باری ، از ماموران در جنگ چهل روزه و بخصوص زدن ایست بازرسی های ورودی و عبوری کامیون های اسلحه در…
❤262👍90💔49😨42😱28😐18👎8👏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @pishgoo_jen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pishgoo_jeen” (@pishgoo_jen), 14,361 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pishgoo_jen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.