Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pitbullkkkkkkkk

Channel

Pitbullkkkkkkkk

@pitbullkkkk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

171subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002125583852
TypeChannel
Username@pitbullkkkk
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pitbullkkkk

Growth

170173171.57 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers16 August 2026 — 171 subscribers24 August 2026 — 173 subscribers30 August 2026 — 172 subscribers9 September 2026 — 171 subscribers1717 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:19171-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:32172-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:45173+2
16 Aug 2026, 19:34171+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 02s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

261 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9235.2%
👏5019.2%
2710.3%
🤬207.66%
🤣166.13%
😭124.60%
🥰114.21%
🗿103.83%
🔥93.45%
💊51.92%
👍41.53%
❤‍🔥10.383%
🌚10.383%
🖕10.383%
😢10.383%
🤯10.383%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,390 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁6👏31

10 Aug 2025, 11:29 UTC667 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁142👏2🤯1

10 Aug 2025, 09:51 UTC≈10,300 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤬4👏2😁1

23 Apr 2025, 12:41 UTC630 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSd9XHShBTM

😁132

30 Jan 2025, 00:43 UTC≈1,930 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Cadê as pessoas fazendo post para aplaudir esse HERÓI?

😁63

23 Jan 2025, 04:52 UTC767 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Monstros! Isso é uma imposição desnecessária sobre uma raça tão dócil.

👏16😁5😭5

17 Jan 2025, 00:54 UTC734 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Mais um caso isolado. Mas não culpem a raça! Provavelmente foi má criação…

💊5🤣5👍2

17 Jan 2025, 00:54 UTC667 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @perfisdegentemortasPhoto

O Ravi Lucas, 04 anos, atacado por pitbull. A avó da criança afirmou que soltou os animais no quintal e foi à vizinha pegar um remédio, enquanto a criança permaneceu dentro do imóvel assistindo tv. Nesse intervalo, os cachorros conseguiram entrar na casa e atacaram a criança. A avó escutou os gritos e correu, mas já encontrou os cães em cima da criança. Os dois cães que atacaram o menino eram criados por ela, send

😭76🤣3

4 Jan 2025, 13:39 UTC≈5,480 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Pitbull brincalhão brincando com banhista em uma praia no litoral

12🗿2

24 Dec 2024, 20:36 UTC918 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Maneira mais efetiva de parar um ataque de pitbull

😁17🤣8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pitbullkkkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pitbullkkkkkkkk” (@pitbullkkkk), 171 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitbullkkkk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.