9 measurements spanning 29 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,544–2,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 07:22
2,545
-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:36
2,546
-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:03
2,548
+1
23 Aug 2026, 05:35
2,547
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:37
2,548
-3
12 Aug 2026, 14:24
2,551
+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:50
2,550
-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:46
2,551
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:38
2,551
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
55
42.0%
👍
28
21.4%
🤣
9
6.87%
❤🔥
7
5.34%
💯
6
4.58%
custom 5215413739976661923
5
3.82%
custom 5372998546788194447
5
3.82%
custom 5787603804434206149
5
3.82%
✍
4
3.05%
🥰
3
2.29%
custom 5895583594402811389
2
1.53%
🆒
1
0.763%
🫡
1
0.763%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pitgrill. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 Открываем набор на BBQ JEDI TRAINING CAMP - 13-я смена
📅 17–18 октября 2026
📍г. Дубна, Московская область
Есть хорошие новости. В новом кэмпе мы обновим нашу классическую программу и добавим несколько новых блюд, которых раньше в BBQ JEDI TRAINING CAMP не было. Пока не будем раскрывать все карты - совсем скоро расскажем о них отдельно. Поверьте, ждать стоит. 😉
Если вы давно мечтали разобраться в настоящем америк…
«Барбекю - это про терпение»
Для самых занятых барбекуеров пришлось обновить карточки товаров, что бы вы не тратили время, тапая на отдельную вкладку с составом.
Теперь все основные ингредиенты маринадов надменно летают вокруг банок.
Пользуйтесь!
Pitgrill.ru
Ozon
🔥 BBQ JEDI TRAINING CAMP в WOODY VILLAGE
У вас уже есть планы на первые идеальные выходные 4-6 сентября?
Мы запускаем первый выездной гастро-BBQ Weekend - два дня наедине с природой, вкусной едой и крафтовым пивом собираются в одно большое гастрономическое приключение.
📍Локация - уютный глэмпинг WOODY VILLAGE (Мск. область, Дмитровский р-н, д. Пантелеево), где можно забыть о городской суете и полностью погрузиться…
Рецепт Африканского соуса для курочки Piri-Piri , приготовленной на Астробоксе на последнем Jedi camp.
На этой неделе анонсируем даты следующего кэмпа. Предварительно 17-18 октября.
По дороге домой из отпуска капитан спортивной команды Astro BBQ клуба выразил почтение и посетил домашнюю проработку Гастробандитов перед небольшим, но важным чемпионатом в гостях у волгоградского клуба Beavers 🦫 на базе Река&Песок!
Потчевали халапенисами в беконе, утиной грудкой и секретными стейками рибай для чемпионата.
Желаем ребятам удачи, а нашим спортсменам победы 🥇!
Соревнования пройдут 7-9 августа, приглашае…
Наверное надо вводить традицию и начинать пост про очередной завершенный кэмп фразой: "Серега уехал домой!"
Короче, Серега уехал домой!
Мы захерачили одиннадцатый BBQ Jedi training camp!
Тем кто приехал к нам выражаем огмный респект и Казань и Москва и Новосибирск и даже Дубна(возможно когда-то забыл)
Мы, вас любим и ценим!
И даже тех, кто еще не приезжал к нам🤣
Следующий Camp состоится 19-20 сентября, но на него…
Посмотрите на эту красоту! Это лишь малая часть из последнего, что готовит @real_style_icon с нашими маринадами. Он постоянный активный участник в чате @pitgrillchat
И я вот что подумал, Лех, тебя можно называть полноценным амбассадором бренда Pitgrill, давай выбирай любой маринад килограммовой фасовки на сайте - отправим после выходных тебе🤝
🔥21👍7💯3custom 53729985467881944472🥰1🫡1🆒1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pitgrill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Тут вдруг стало интересно, какого производителя говядины 🤩вы чаще берете?
Праймбиф40%
Мираторг44%
Рынок/фермерское10%
Другое5%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Егор Тарнакин @egortarnakin · 31,390 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 6 September 2026
Шеф-повар Василий Емельяненко / Рецепты @chefvasiliy · 47,756 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pitgrill BBQ” (@pitgrill), 2,545 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitgrill.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
